Jul 092012
 

“I don’t want Christian principles,” says Rafe Mair. “I want decent decisions, based upon justice for all and sound judgement in the public interest.

“But does that, for my vote, exclude the deeply religious?” He asks. Then he answers his own question:
“Yes. I don’t want criminal law or social laws or human rights based upon fundamentalists’ notion of Christian principles. Indeed, I don’t want government by people who, in order to get political support, must pander to the religious right…”

Note that in these statements, Mr. Mair makes some questionable assumptions:
• that Christian principles are incompatible with decent decisions or equal justice for all;
• that “Christian” equals “fundamentalist”;
• that Christians in politics “must pander to the religious right”—a term liberally used by Leftists to malign people of faith.

Rafe Mair similarly criticized Kari Simpson, actually comparing her to Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan, and alleging that she had written him a letter in which she accused him of defending pedophiles (which she denies).

But in an on-line Tyee opinion piece October 22, 2007, Mair himself wrote, “When oh when are we going to understand that pedophiles are sick people, and should be treated as patients and quarantined until doctors can state that it’s safe to release them? Putting them through the justice system merely ensures that they will be back on the street uncured.”

In short, he does not believe pedophiles should be prosecuted for their crimes, but should be medically treated—although psychological and psychiatric professionals state emphatically that a very low percentage of pedophiles will respond to such therapy.

Rafe Mair is a lawyer, former politician, political commentator and broadcast personality in British Columbia. He often labels his own opinions as “facts”, even though sometimes they are diametrically opposed to the real facts. And sometimes, to back up his so-called “facts”, he lies.

His political career began in 1975, when he was elected as Social Credit MLA for Kamloops. He held that seat, and also served as Minister of Health and then Education, until he retired from politics in 1981. During the patriation of the Constitution of Canada in 1981-82, he was BC’s chief delegate on constitutional matters.

In 1981, he left government to become a talk show host. Rafe soon landed the coveted morning commute time slot on CKNW radio. Despite high ratings, he was fired in June of 2003 after scandalous allegations were made public involving a female producer also employed at CKNW. Rafe then moved to CKBD, an oldies music station; his morning talk show ended in late 2005, after which he became a regular commentary guest on Omni Television‘s current affairs program, The Standard. Mair contributed three commentaries a week until January 2006, when the commentary segment of the program was deleted. However, he has continued his relationship with The Standard, guest-hosting the program from time to time. He remains active as a regular columnist for a chain of community newspapers and for the on-line magazine The Tyee, and he often appears as a political commentator for several broadcast outlets, including CBC Radio.

An avid fisherman, he has been an outspoken critic of salmon farming in BC. Although he has usually been considered politically conservative, Mair’s views have been very liberal on environmental and social issues.
Disillusioned with the three biggest federal parties, he has supported the Green Party; but he more commonly supports individual candidates, rather than parties—including Svend Robinson, NDP MP, who was convicted of stealing an expensive diamond ring for his “partner”.

Rafe Mair was the principal spokesperson for Save Our Rivers, a group organized to fight private run-of-river hydroelectric development. He is currently a contributor to The Common Sense Canadian, a news and opinion Internet site; and he also hosts a quasi-religious television program called The Search.

This Week On RoadKill Radio.com! (July 9 – July 15, 2012)

 Comments Off on This Week On RoadKill Radio.com! (July 9 – July 15, 2012)
Jul 092012
 

Rafe Mair Exposed, Free Speech Gains Ground, COFFEE, Arrested for Mentioning the Law, Police State? – There’s an Nasty Appy for That, Homophobophobia, and Strength in Numbers!
Daily at 7:30 pm Eastern

Monday, July 9, 2012
Drive For Justice: Rafe Mair, a Biography

Ron Gray brings us up to speed on one of the villains of this story. Meet Rafe Mair: the liar, the hater, the bully…the “shock-jock” villain who triggered the chain of events that would lead to a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that is far from over.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012
RoadKill Radio News: Canada Attacks Free Speech with Entrapment and Intimidation

Join Kari Simpson and Ron Gray as they speak to free speech champion Marc Lemire (FreedomSite.org, StopSection13.com), the leading force in the campaign to remove the oppressive Section 13 from Canada’s Human Rights Code. Is the tide finally turning in favour of free speech in Canada?

Wednesday, July 11, 2012
The National Absurder: Coffee is Bad For You! No, Wait! It’s Good! No, Wait…

Over a nice cup of coffee, Jim Lawter mulls the results of the seemingly endless stream of studies that prove definitively that coffee is good / bad / good / bad / good / bad … for you.

Thursday, July 12, 2012
The Mark Hasiuk Show: Cecilia von Dehn Faces Prison for Telling the Law!

Mark Hasiuk hosts Cecilia von Dehn, convicted of notifying people about the law that prohibits picketing near abortion clinics. Can educating the public about a law be considered “picketing”? Canadian rights like Free speech takes another bloody beating at the hands of alarmists and activist courts.

Friday, July 13, 2012
Culture Guard: Public Education 101 – Crafting wimps and snitches!

Kari Simpson looks at 2 more reasons why parents MUST evacuate the Public Education system! Examined is the Liberal Party of BC’s latest Nasty App for kids to help them police bullies. Can you say 1930s Germany? How does turning our public school kids into anonymous snitches help them?

Saturday, July 14, 2012
Family Freedom Fighters: CHP’s Jim Hnatiuk Warns Against Cataloging People

Ron Gray interviews Jim Hnatiuk, leader of the CHP, about Quebec’s new “Homophobic Acts Registry”. Similar to BC’s snitch App, Quebec is investing millions of taxpayer dollars into turning the public against itself.

Sunday, July 15, 2012
The Prophets War: Pump Up the Volume

General Disorder suggests a method that small radical groups might use to bolster their numbers, effectively giving them power they might never enjoy otherwise.

BC Social activist targets judges, lawyers and media in her demand for a parliamentary inquiry into judicial corruption

 Comments Off on BC Social activist targets judges, lawyers and media in her demand for a parliamentary inquiry into judicial corruption
Jul 062012
 

ROADKILL RADIO NEWS RELEASE
July 6, 2012
For immediate release

Letter sent to PM Harper today

BC Social activist targets judges, lawyers and media in her

demand for a parliamentary inquiry into judicial corruption

 

LANGLEY, BC, July 6, 2012 (RoadKillRadio.com)—BC social activist Kari Simpson has asked Prime Minister Stephen Harper for a parliamentary inquiry into judicial corruption in Canada’s courts.

Charging malfeasance by judges and lawyers in her own defamation lawsuit against broadcaster Rafe Mair, Simpson outlines in a letter to the Prime Minister details about judges who should not have been on the bench, other judges who covered for them, lawyers who failed to follow the rules in drafting her case, and how the Supreme Court changed the rules and then denied Simpson the right to have her case heard in light of the new legal test.

The record of corruption by both judges and lawyers illustrates why the public has lost faith in Canada’s justice system, Simpson says. “When the very people who are supposed to protect the Rule of Law bring the law into disrepute, it’s time for Parliament to act,” she says.

In her letter to the Prime Minister and the accompanying summary brief, Simpson draws attention to Section 101 of the Constitution Act, which gives Parliament the authority to set up a superior court of appeals whenever the justice system falls into disrepute. The 15 pointed questions she asks the Prime Minister to answer bring to light disturbing facts, and reveal a troubled and broken court system.

Simpson states: “I write to apprise you of a serious matter that requires your attention. The information contained herein details a level of corruption and contempt for the Rule of Law within our courts that can no longer be ignored. The egregious conduct blatantly and arrogantly displayed by those who are sworn members of the judiciary warrant, at the very least, a parliamentary inquiry.”

The troubling events detailed in Simpson’s letter and brief to the Prime Minister flow from a lawsuit she initiated in 1999 against former radio talk show host Rafe Mair and his radio station, CKNW.

Beginning in 1997, Mair had launched a two-year campaign of hate and lies about Simpson. He published more than 40 hate-filled editorials on air, in print, and on-line that maligned her, fabricating events that falsely represented her and her motives in her social advocacy work defending parents’ rights within the public school system.

The case eventually went to the Supreme Court of Canada. In its decision the SCC “modified” (i.e., changed) the legal test for a defence of “honest belief”—but failed to order a new trial so the facts of the case could be heard and considered according to the new test. Ironically, the case of WIC v. SIMPSON had been cited in a subsequent trial as a precedent that showed why a new trial should be ordered. But instead, the high court found in favour of Mair and restored the original trial judge’s decision.  However, the original trial judge was not qualified to preside over the case, because at the time she was herself embroiled in scandal that involved two similar defamation suits against her spouse, and her own culpability in the fraudulent conveyance of property in an unlawful attempt to protect the assets from legal claim.

The SCC also repeated from the bench demonstrably false accusations made by Mair against Simpson, thus compounding and bolstering the harm to her reputation.

Simpson names names in her briefing document. She accuses BC Supreme Court Justice Mary Marvyn Koenigsberg, Rafe Mair and Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin of the Supreme Court of Canada of publishing defamatory lies and violating the law. Simpson’s brief is meticulous in referencing dates and events, including a comparative timeline that demonstrates the illegal activities, bias and conflicts of the trial judge.

Simpson’s letter to the Prime Minister is only the kick-off in her Drive for Justice campaign, which she asserts is “a campaign that will not stop until justice is not only done, but seen to be done.” Simpson’s closing remarks to Harper clearly define the problem. She says, “The events detailed herein depict a constitutional calamity of epic proportions, and should deservedly shake the judicial establishment to its core.”

See a PDF of Kari Simpson’s letter and brief here, and they can also be found at driveforjustice.com

For more information contact Kari Simpson

Tel: 604 514-1614

Email: driveforjustice@gmail.com

 

RoadKill Radio News: Rogue BC Judge Overrules Canadian Supreme Court!

 Comments Off on RoadKill Radio News: Rogue BC Judge Overrules Canadian Supreme Court!
Jun 262012
 

Join Kari Simpson and Ron Gray as they host Alex Shadenberg, who offers his take on the BC judge who overturned the Supreme Court of Canada and defied Parliament by ruling that assisted suicide and euthanasia are legal. More insanity from “The Court Party” of Canada!

Drive For Justice 04: Letter to Prime Minister Harper

 Comments Off on Drive For Justice 04: Letter to Prime Minister Harper
Jun 252012
 

Prominent British Columbia social activist Kari Simpson—a spokesperson for you, if you believe, like most civil-minded Canadians, that conventional morality creates and protects social harmony—has written to Prime Minister Harper, asking him to provide the leadership his office demands, in protecting all Canadians’ freedom of expression, and their right to a fair and impartial hearing in our courts. In her letter, she draws to the Prime Minister’s attention, in what RoadKillRadio is calling Drive for Justice, some egregious violations of those rights.

In a defamation lawsuit that worked its way through the BC Supreme Court, the BC Court of Appeals, and finally to the Supreme Court of Canada, those rights were repeatedly violated… with the knowledge and complicity of other judges and lawyers.

Her questions include:

A judge of the BC Supreme Court—who has admitted financially supporting her “spouse” while he was using the Internet for (among other things) promoting hatred and contempt for Jews generally; and vilifying, defaming and libeling several prominent Jewish businessmen—at the same time, this same judge, presided over a defamation suit that involves a high-profile former lawyer—you know: a member of the legal “brethren”—a former MLA and provincial Cabinet Minister, and a member of the media who has publicly stated that he does not want influential Judeo-Christians (as the plaintiff is) to hold public office.

If that judge also transfers property title from her “spouse” to herself, so he escapes payment of a court-awarded judgement after he was found to have defamed the Jewish businessmen, isn’t that called “fraudulent conveyance”? And doesn’t that vitiate the protection afforded judges, which they have only as long as they are “of good behaviour”, according to the Constitution Act?

Question 1 – Don’t the ethical standards of the Canadian Judicial Council require that a judge, when personally embroiled in such conflicts, must disqualify herself from a case that is similar in fact—i.e., defamation involving religious bigotry?

Question 2 – Should the Chief Justice of the BC Supreme Court, also a member of the Canadian Judicial Council, preside over a legal matter involving one of his own judges?

Question 3 – Doesn’t a party to a legal proceeding have the right to know what legal test they have to meet in court? If the Supreme Court of Canada changes the legal test in mid-trial, as Chief Justice McLachlin did in this case, isn’t there a obligation to allow the parties to the trial to re-state their case, incorporating the new standard?

Question 4 – What gives justices of the high court the right to repeat lies that defame an individual, and to embellish them, as happened in this case?

Question 5 – How can the Canadian Judicial Council be trusted to investigate its own activities? How can the legal “brethren” be trusted to sit in judgement of their own activities?

But the most important question of all in Mrs. Simpson’s letter to the Prime Minister is this:

Will you call for a parliamentary enquiry into this evidence of judicial corruption and mocking of the Rule of Law?

When judicial independence is abused to protect those who violate judicial probity, there must be a venue of appeal and accountability beyond the courts themselves; that is the essence of our Drive for Justice. There is a famous precedent in Canadian law: in 1929, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that women were not “persons” in law. Five spunky women from Alberta appealed that ruling to the Privy Council at Westminster, which at that time had authority to review Supreme Court decisions; Canadians lost that right of appeal in 1947, and it has never been replaced. The loss of that right—to appeal to a body that is accountable to the Constitution—was a deficiency in Prime Minister Trudeau’s 1982 Constitution Act. That deficiency still needs to be corrected today.

Will the Prime Minister act to protect the integrity of the judicial system and the confidence of the Canadian people in the administration of law?

Stay tuned.

This Week On RoadKill Radio! (June 18 – June 24, 2012)

 Comments Off on This Week On RoadKill Radio! (June 18 – June 24, 2012)
Jun 202012
 

Nothing New!!!

That’s right, for the first time since late March, RoadKill Radio is taking a well-deserved break! Well, sort of…

We’re working on new material and are already shooting some of next week’s shows. Of special interest should be our “Drive For Justice” series, a close examination of Kari Simpson‘s real-life defamation lawsuit against the liar Rafe Mair. This story is full of vindictive, defamatory behavior by the former CKNW talk show host, judicial corruption (Madame Justice M. Marvyn Koenigsberg is at the top of our list), and the illegal changing of federal law by an unchecked Supreme Court. And it’s not over yet…

So please browser the hundreds of videos and written commentary on RoadKillRadio.com and stay tuned next Monday, June 25, for all new shows each day of the week.

Every Week on RoadKillRadio.com

Be Informed on Issues that are Ignored or Misrepresented by the Downstream Media
Hidden Political Agendas, Dangers of Smart Meters and Vaccines, Proposed Changes in the Law, Judicial Chicanery, Threats to Parental Rights, Rampant Tax Waste…

Mondays: Drive For Justice
Ron Gray hosts this explosive series that exposes a myriad of incidents of judicial corruption and treason involved in one of Canada’s most scandalous libel cases, as he follows Kari’s Simpson’s very public campaign to hold the corrupt judges accountable.  This is a take-no-prisoners series.  We name the lawyers and judges involved, plus we’ll provide you with all the background documentation.  This important historical campaign will result in judicial accountability and is dedicated to all the judges and lawyers who honourably uphold the Rule of Law.  It is time to end the mischief.  It is time to end judicial corruption and the judicial activism of the “Court Party” that has perverted the Rule of Law, undermined our civil democracy, and defiled the administration of justice.  You will want to be on this road trip!

Tuesdays: RoadKill Radio News
Kari Simpson and Ron Gray host our flagship show, presenting timely interviews with movers and shakers in government, business, the public, and behind the scenes.

Wednesdays: This Day in History or The National Absurder
Alternately, Mark Hasiuk presents brief history lessons and draws comparisons to current events, while Jim Lawter comments on issues that often don’t even occur to people – and sometimes probably shouldn’t!

Thursdays: The Mark Hasiuk Show
Mark Hasiuk interviews a wide spectrum of guests in his quest to bring you stories that the Downstream (“Mainstream”) Media are afraid to cover – or are paid to ignore.

Fridays: Culture Guard
Kari Simpson interviews guests regarding the health, safety and well-being of Canadians and their culture, with an emphasis on freedom of choice and expression, equality for all, and putting Government and Corporations back in their place as servants of the public rather than our masters.

Saturdays: Family Freedom Fighters
Ron Gray presents his commentary and interviews guests, always with an eye on preserving and promoting the rights and freedoms of families everywhere.

Sundays: The Prophets War
Something new, different and educational!  An ongoing drama about the struggle to maintain our civil society.  The Enemy: subversive forces that implement plans designed to create societal havoc and distraction.  Have you ever wondered why you have to pay so much in tax?  Why do you have to pay for somebody else’s sex change operation?  Why won’t the government label GMO foods?  Tune in every week for this one!  Be strong – Plan to Survive!

May 282012
 

Prologue

Enough is Enough
 
Judicial corruption has made the Rule of Law into a fool's toy.

Mockery of the law is the voice that now echoes loudly in the courtrooms of a once honourable nation. It is the voice of the Supreme Court’s High Priestess, Chief Justice McLachlin.

It is a voice that will lie, deceive and cheat. Her defilement of the Law is brazen. She is feared by some, but there is talk of a revolution and those voices of revolt are growing.

Among those voices is the voice of an ordinary person, one who is duty bound by birth, citizenship and truth to restore the Rule of Law to Canada and to expose and cast out those who abuse their power on the seat of justice. It is the voice of …

Kari Simpson

… and this is the story of Roadkill Radio’s …

DRIVE FOR JUSTICE

Mar 242012
 

Canada’s courts are sick.

But there is a cure, and YOU are part of it.

Let me describe the problem, and then I’ll tell you how you can be part of the solution.

Back in 1979, Prime Minister Trudeau asked the Supreme Court of Canada to define Canada’s Constitution. The judges answered that there are two equally-important parts to the Constitution: the written document, and the body of tradition that we inherited from Magna Carta through the Glorious Revolution of 1688.

That body of tradition says that in a constitutional monarchy, all government action is in the name of the Crown, but the Crown has no direct role: everything is done through the three branches of government: the elected legislature makes the laws; the Cabinet administers the laws through the civil service; and the courts settle disputes according to the law as they find it written.

That last phrase is important. Judges interpret law, but they don’t make law.

However, in 1982, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was embedded in our new Constitution, and that made judges the final arbiters of the law.

It wasn’t always that way.

Back in 1929, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that women were not “persons” under the law. Five spunky ladies from Alberta challenged that ruling, taking it to the Privy Council in England. The Privy Council overruled the high court and declared that women are, indeed, persons.

But in 1947, with the Citizenship Act, Canadians lost the right to appeal to the Privy Council. That Act and the Charter, together, left the judiciary supreme. Since 1982, judges—and especially the ermine-clad masters of the Supreme Court—have become increasingly activist. And example is the recent ruling in a Quebec case that denies parents’ right to determine their children’s education. That ruling violates the decision by Canada’s Parliament to sign the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which clearly affirms those rights in Article 26, Section 3.

The Supreme Court doesn’t care. In fact, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, in a speech in New Zealand to a world convention of judges, urged judges world-wide to rely on their own judgement, rather than on laws or constitutions.

Whoa! That sent up warning flags.

So what’s the solution?

Parliament has to create a Standing Committee on the Judiciary, and give it the power to examine any court ruling, on the sole ground of its conformity to the constitution. If the committee decides a particular court decision looks unconstitutional, it would bring a Bill into Parliament to change that decision. That would make the courts accountable to the Standing Committee for conforming to the Constitution; the Committee is accountable to Parliament; and Parliament is accountable to the electorate.

This is where YOU come in: you have to write to your Member of Parliament, tell them the courts are out of control, and DEMAND that Parliament create the Standing Committee on the Judiciary.

Now the ball is in your court—the court that has final authority inn a democracy.

EFC’s Don Hutchinson on the Erosion of Parental Rights

 Comments Off on EFC’s Don Hutchinson on the Erosion of Parental Rights
Feb 282012
 

RoadKill Radio News: Canada’s Supreme Court Weasels Out!

Join Kari Simpson and Ron Gray as they speak with Don Hutchinson, VP and General Legal Counsel of The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. Last week, the Supreme Court of Canada continued its systematic erosion of parental rights in the education of their children by refusing to decide in a case that would allow home schooled children to opt out of programs that parents may find contrary to their cultural and religious beliefs.

Until harm is done, said the Court, the children must be subjected to the state’s version of religious instruction. No harm prevention considered!? Why, then, does the Court allow children to be forcibly removed from their homes when the State perceives potential harm? The Supreme Court’s anti-parent double standard is showing again.

And now comes Ontario’s Bill 13, using bully tactics of its own to further erode parental rights. Get Informed and Get Mobilized!

Next On RoadKill Radio!

 Comments Off on Next On RoadKill Radio!
Feb 262012
 
Sunday, February 26: Culture Guard

‘Homophobe’ is a SLUR

Kari Simpson and Ron Gray discuss the official complaint filed with British Columbia’s Minister of Education, George Abbott, concerning the acceptance and use of hateful slurs by and in the public school system. Epithets such as ‘homophobe’ and ‘heterosexist’ are being used in official school documents and by teachers and members of the school board, often to demean a person’s cultural, moral or religious opinion.

Also discussed is the phenomenon of the anti-bullying Pink Shirt Day initiative being taken over by special interest groups to insert exclusionary programs within the public school system. Kids are, in fact, being bullied into wearing pink shirts to school to support biased political activism.

Monday, February 27: RKR Flash Drive with Mark Hasiuk

This Day in History, February 27, 2012: False Flags

Tune in as Mark draws comparisons between “False Flag” operations throughout history. False Flags are government operations that are manufactured in order to place blame on an enemy, thereby “legitimizing” retaliation. Notable are the Reichstag Fire that solidified the Nazi grasp on Germany, the Tonkin Incident that placed false blame on the North Vietnamese, and Iraq’s supposed WMD. Is Iran now being targeted with new False Flags?

Tuesday, February 28: RoadKill Radio News

Supreme Court vs. Parental Rights

Join Kari Simpson and Ron Gray as they speak with Don Hutchinson, VP and General Legal Counsel of The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. Last week, the Supreme Court of Canada continued its systematic erosion of parental rights in the education of their children by refusing to decide in a case that would allow parents to determine what is appropriate in the education of their children.

Until harm is done, said the Court, the children must be subjected to the state’s version of religious instruction. No harm prevention considered!? Why, then, does the Court allow children to be forcibly removed from their homes when the State perceives a “likelihood” of potential harm? The Supreme Court’s anti-parent double standard is showing again.

And now comes Ontario’s Bill 13, using bully tactics of its own to further erode parental rights and brainwash children with sex activist political propaganda. Get Informed and Get Mobilized!


WHERE: Listen/watch – http://www.roadkillradio.com

EMAIL THE SHOW: Roadkillradio@live.ca

Your Calls, Your Thoughts, Your Opinions, Your Outrage is welcome!

ALL SHOWS ARE ARCHIVED, LISTEN FOR FREE!!!

Nov 222011
 

Join RoadKill Radio’s Kari Simpson in this Culture Guard special as she interviews Bill Whatcott about the events that led up to his lawsuit before the Supreme Court of Canada.

YOUR freedom of speech, YOUR freedom of Religion in Canada is at stake in this epic court battle. Will the Justices classify the Bible as “hate speech” because it identifies certain behavior as sinful?

Tuesday, November 22, 2011: Are we DOOMED to censorship?

 Comments Off on Tuesday, November 22, 2011: Are we DOOMED to censorship?
Nov 222011
 

Will “political correctness” finally doom us all to a life of censorship?


Tonight On RoadKillRadio.com!
Nov. 22, 2011- 7:30 pm

Join RoadKill Radio’s Kari Simpson in this Culture Guard special as she interviews Bill Whatcott about the events that led up to his lawsuit before the Supreme Court of Canada.

YOUR freedom of speech, YOUR freedom of Religion in Canada is at stake in this epic court battle. Will the Justices classify the Bible as “hate speech” because it identifies certain behavior as sinful?

Important Topic: Free Speech in Canada!

Join Kari Simpson tonight on RoadKillRadio.com

Important Show

WHERE: Listen – http://www.roadkillradio.com

EMAIL THE SHOW: RoadKillRadio@live.ca

Your Thoughts, Your Opinions, Your Outrage are welcome!

ALL SHOWS ARE ARCHIVED, LISTEN FOR FREE!!!

Nov. 1, 2011 Webcast: INSITE Insanity – Thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada

 Comments Off on Nov. 1, 2011 Webcast: INSITE Insanity – Thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada
Nov 012011
 



Show #122, audio only:

Download Show #122, audio only


Super Special with
Kari Simpson and Mark Hasiuk!!


David Berner, one of RKR’s most popular guests, is back with a straight–talkin’, take–no–prisoners chat about the INSITE INSANITY!!
Yep: your hard-earned tax dollars paying for addicts to kill themselves — safely!!

Tuesdays at 7:30pm



Important Show

WHERE: Listen – http://www.roadkillradio.com

EMAIL THE SHOW: RoadKillRadio@live.ca

Your Thoughts, Your Opinions, Your Outrage are welcome!

ALL SHOWS ARE ARCHIVED, LISTEN FOR FREE!!!

1 November 2011: How INSANE Is the Supreme Court of Canada?

 Comments Off on 1 November 2011: How INSANE Is the Supreme Court of Canada?
Nov 012011
 

How INSANE is the
Supreme Court of Canada?

Find out

Tonight On RoadKill Radio!


Nov. 1, 2011- 7:30 pm
RoadKillRadio.com
Super Special with
Kari Simpson and Mark Hasiuk!!


David Berner, one of RKR’s most popular guests, is back with a straight–talkin’, take–no–prisoners chat about the INSITE INSANITY!!
Yep: your hard-earned tax dollars paying for addicts to kill themselves — safely!!

Tuesdays at 7:30pm



Important Show

WHERE: Listen – http://www.roadkillradio.com

EMAIL THE SHOW: RoadKillRadio@live.ca

Your Thoughts, Your Opinions, Your Outrage are welcome!

ALL SHOWS ARE ARCHIVED, LISTEN FOR FREE!!!

Oct 252011
 



Show #121, audio only:

Download Show #121, audio only

Kari Simpson interviews –

SENATOR GERRY ST. GERMAIN
MP BRAD TROST
JOHN HOF, CAMPAIGN LIFE

A message from Kari Simpson – This LIFE MATTERS special is dedicated to the memory of baby Rodney Effert, who was strangled to death by his mother shortly after his birth – and then on Sept 14, 2011 was abandoned by the Canadian Justice system when the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned Katrina Effert’s murder conviction. Angry Canadians became outraged when the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear the appeal.

The time is now for you, as civil and just Canadians, to demand protection for our most vulnerable. It is time to end the taxpayer funded extermination of our children through the brutal act of abortion. It is time to send a clear message to the courts and to our elected officials that LIFE MATTERS.

The life of baby Rodney deserved to be protected.
Prime Minister Harper, WE DEMAND THE DEBATE.

Life Matters, your voice counts.

Further reading:
http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/
http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/
http://www.silentnomoreawareness.org/rc/canada.aspx
http://wewantthedebate.ca/
http://www.lifesitenews.com/
http://www.lifecanada.org/

Oct 182011
 



Show #120, audio only:

Download Show #120, audio only

FREEDOM SPECIAL



THOMAS SCHUCK is a lawyer, freedom fighter and truth-sayer. Thomas Schuck is also YOUR freedom protector, YOUR faith defender and guardian of YOUR free speech rights!

Oh… and yes, he is also Bill Whatcott’s legal counsel.

You need to be aware that on October 12, 2011 a crucial case was heard in the Supreme Court of Canada that involved YOU and YOUR liberty rights to freedom of thought, religion and speech.

Tonight, Thomas Schuck details the events leading-up to his recent appearance before the Supreme Court of Canada, a historic event as the case involved a record number of interveners.

Click here for info on how to obtain your copy of the Freedom of What?Cott or to watch the trailer.