Drive For Justice 20: The Trial Begins

 Comments Off on Drive For Justice 20: The Trial Begins
Nov 052012
 

Ron Gray takes us into the original Supreme Court of British Columbia trial in which Kari Simpson's lawsuit against shock jock Rafe Mair and his radio station was heard by Justice Mary Marvyn Koenigsberg who – unbeknownst to Simpson at the time – was embroiled in her own anti-defamation lawsuit. You'll hear the arguments made in defence of Rafe Mair's outlandish lies and slanders against an innocent defender of family rights, and hear why "Justice" Koenigsberg might be inclined to look the other way.

Culture Guard: Why We Should Support Dr. Steve Tourloukis’ Legal Fight

 Comments Off on Culture Guard: Why We Should Support Dr. Steve Tourloukis’ Legal Fight
Sep 282012
 

Kari Simpson recounts the tribulations of Dr. Steve Tourloukis and other concerned parents who are fighting to preserve their rights within the public education system. Why should we support Dr. Steve Tourloukis' legal fight? Because it is Our Battle as well.

Culture Guard: Canada’s Road to Tyranny

 Comments Off on Culture Guard: Canada’s Road to Tyranny
Sep 212012
 

Kari Simpson speaks to Don Spratt, one of the many victims of Canada's anti-free speech actions. Mr. Spratt brings us up to date on his legal battles, and details how Canada is on a Road to Tyranny. Will Canadian citizens continue to sit back and passively let their rights to free speech erode until it's too late to turn back?

Sep 072012
 

Greetings Dr. Phil!

I need help! I am not sure if I need an intervention or just some help on how to manage my obsession for truth and fact, maybe both!!

You see, I work as a successful public advocate on issues that affect parental rights, education, children’s rights and other crucial issues that affect civil citizens.

I admit that I don’t mince words, raising four great kids as a single mom in a busy household that included a demanding work schedule required a “cut to the chase, here’s the real deal” approach. It worked. You’ll be happy to know that all four kids have turned out to be responsible and hard-working… none live at home! Zero drug, alcohol or behaviour issues and most importantly they, as adults, understand their essential role and responsibilities to their spouses, their children and the community.

This “tell it like it is” approach has not only served my family well but a growing community of common-sense civil Americans and Canadians that are fed-up with the blather, statistical nonsense and costs – both culturally and monetarily – associated with the professional squawk boxers. You know those special interest groups that rely on manufactured stories of twisted reality to bully and dupe politicians, courts, media and public schools into compliance of their world view and have us tax- payers pay for it.

Now here’s my problem: I detest liars and bullies. I admit I have had this problem since I was a kid going to school. I always rallied to the defence of those who were being bullied or picked on. That is not to say some kids deserved to be told-off, but the ones who found salvation in my friendship were those who were targeted for reasons other than being annoying idiots.

In my adult life the manifestation of my problem has escalated. Here are some examples –

– A few years back I became aware that social workers were abusing their authority in British Columbia and destroying families and harming children with their bully tactics and lies. I exposed this fact, it created a huge hullabaloo! I was threatened, called all kinds of names but felt compelled to inform the public about the truth of what was happening. My obsession with telling the truth finally resulted in the Government challenging me to a Public Inquiry. The findings of that Inquiry came down boldly aligned my position. Too many apprehensions, families were being destroyed, children harmed, changes needed. The government Minister responsible apologized to me and admitted there were problems with in our social services.

– Another manifestation of my problem happened when parents were being lied to about the true objectives of a program being fraudulently marketed to them as a sex abuse prevention program for 5 year-olds. Teachers jumped on the band-wagon of “save the child” and failed to objectively critique the program and the confusion that would obviously ensue as a result of little impressionable minds being told over and over again that the people most likely to harm them were their fathers and grandfathers. To make matters worse the children were told that this form of abuse included being touched anywhere a one piece bathing suit covered and included pictures like the one of a grandfather scooping his granddaughter up into his arms and equating a loving pat on the backside to abuse.

These confused little kids were then encouraged – by their teachers – to report this kind of “bad touching.” Teachers of course were portrayed in the program as the children’s saviour. Needless to say there was a rash of false reports of “sexual abuse.”

I received calls about this program from concerned parents who were being bullied into having their children participate in it. Teachers were told that if a parent objected the program it was because they were abusing their child. Well as you know I don’t like bullies or liars and I don’t like teachers undermining healthy family relationships, so I exposed the program and its faults. I was threatened and called all kinds of names but succeeded in eliminating the program from the schools and was thanked by hundreds of parents.

– Then there was the war on behalf of the good teachers, who were getting fed up with the homosexual sex activist teachers within their union. They asked for my help. To add to the crisis at the time there was an anti-family government in power. The problematic government supported this agenda but was publicly lying about what they were doing within the education ministry. Further, the sex activist teachers were lying, and bullying parents.

Well as you know, my problem demanded action. I was compelled to ensure that the truth about what was transpiring was told and that the bullies were going to have to deal with someone who wasn’t afraid to put them in their place.

I exposed the antics of the bullies and the lies being told by the government. As a result of my problem, I was labelled by a respected publication as being the most Dangerous Woman in BC – at least dangerous to those who dared to lie, undermine the rights of parents or snub the sensibilities of civil-mined citizens.

My obsession with truth and the need to battle on behalf of those who are being bullied resulted in the decimation of that problematic government. The NDP as they are called went from being a majority government to being left with only 2 seats out of 75. I was thanked by tens of thousands of British Columbians.

– My problem of being truthful about what is politically transpiring can be a dangerous one and often puts me in publicly-threatening situations, but when my compulsions for truthful, factual dialogue involve children and the agenda of the sex activists – especially homosexual sex activists – well the threats escalate to include threats against my life and those of my kids.

Now I realize most politicians, courts, journalists and professionals are cowardly and sensibly acquiesce to the sex activists’ twisted facts and rhetoric for fear of reprisal. My obsession for truth compels me to do otherwise. Dr. Phil is there something wrong with me?

Here is a recent disturbing example of my problem.

– A 25 year-old homosexual activist, convicted for sexual assault against a minor, wrote a letter back in 2007 detailing activities taking place during meetings for homosexual youth in the state of Maine, activities that included sexual interference between adults and minors, and described events including his own plans to murder another attendee and commit suicide. This young man, Mr. Flanders, distributed the letter himself and it was received by the local police, government health agencies, pro-family groups, and the local news media.

Mr. Flanders has a website and has dedicated a large portion of his public blog to reiterate these events, as well as subsequent events involving his stabbing of two people – those two people being his “minor boyfriend” and his father – after violating a restraining order by breaking into their home. Mr. Flanders has since become very public about his perceived “victimization” by the individuals and the agencies involved in prosecuting and convicting him of several crimes of violence. The “victimizers” include: the District Attorney, certain judges, lawyers, police and individuals like me. Mr. Flanders has filed numerous formal complaints against them resulting in a huge cost to tax-payers and the consumption of valuable time and money for the targeted individuals.

Anyway, a respected organization in Massachusetts dedicated to informing the public on issues related to sex activists posted the letter in 2007 on their website. In Nov. of 2011, Mr. Flanders took issue with this and convinced a judge in the state of Maine that the spokesman for this organization was “stalking” him and obtained a Personal Protection Order against Brian Camenker. Mr. Flanders then sued Mr. Camenker for 1 million dollars, $500,000.00 of which is because Mr. Flanders is homosexual and thinks he deserves additional damages due to his sexual preference.

Well, I don’t like these kinds of litigious bully tactics, so I interviewed Mr. Camenker about the situation on my Internet talk show called RoadKill Radio.com.

I also had my producer invite Mr. Flanders on. The next thing you know, Mr. Flanders is threatening me! He contacted our video streaming company, lied to them and almost succeeded in pulling us off the Internet – he has done this to numerous others.

But you know I couldn’t help myself, I don’t like liars or bullies so I retained a respected lawyer who quickly resolved the problem. Then Mr. Flanders threatened my lawyer, demanding that he lie about his representation of RoadKill Radio.com and that he cease acting on our behalf!

I have since learned that Mr. Flanders is now suing a respected judge in Maine, a university, and a police department as well as Mr. Camenker. I am beginning to wonder; Is this a case of vexatious litigation due to querulous paranoia? Or is it my problem?

Dr. Phil, why do I perceive Mr. Flanders as a bully? Why am I compelled to stop this bully? Can you help me and all the others who are trying to counter the lies and bully tactics of this man and others like him?

Please Dr. Phil, please tell me why can’t I be like so many others and just accept that whatever a homosexual sex activist says is to be deemed as truth – even when it is a lie? Why do I care more about the best interests of children and truth than offending a political sex activist or in this case a registered sex offender?

You know Dr. Phil the other victories I have won on these fronts…too many to mention here – against sex activists bullies – leads me to believe my problem, albeit rare, just might be a really good one!

Eek! See how deluded I am!
Quick! Please help me!

I’m Kari Simpson and you can contact me by email at CultureGuard@gmail.com

RoadKill Radio News: Ezra Levant Wants Equal Freedom of Speech Rights

 Comments Off on RoadKill Radio News: Ezra Levant Wants Equal Freedom of Speech Rights
Aug 212012
 


Kari Simpson and Ron Gray speak to Ezra Levant of Sun News Network, who recently faced government-imposed censorship stemming from an editorial comment he made on his broadcast. It turns out that members of the broadcast media do not share the same freedom of speech rights that average Canadian citizens enjoy. Say what!?

Support Ezra’s fight for Free Speech by sending your dissatisfaction with this decision to the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council:

Fax: 613-233-4826
Email: complaints@cbsc.ca

Andrée Noël – National Chair:

anoel@cbsc.ca

John MacNab – Executive Director:

jmacnab@cbsc.ca

Teisha Gaylard – Director of Policy:

tgaylard@cbsc.ca

This Week On RoadKill Radio.com! (August 20 – August 26, 2012)

 Comments Off on This Week On RoadKill Radio.com! (August 20 – August 26, 2012)
Aug 202012
 

Mair’s Lies in Overdrive, Ezra Levant is Censored, Racist Mob Mentality,
Hypocritical Vimeo, and The Pain in Spain.

Daily at 7:30 pm Eastern

Monday, August 20, 2012
Drive For Justice 10: Rafe Mair’s Campaign of Hate Goes Into Overdrive
Ron Gray recounts the turning point in the happy working relationship that had existed between Rafe Mair and Kari Simpson for nearly a decade, when suddenly Mair shifted gears and began ratcheting up his malicious campaign of lies about and vilification of Kari Simpson.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012
RoadKill Radio News: Ezra Levant Wants Equal Freedom of Speech Rights
Kari Simpson and Ron Gray speak to Ezra Levant of Sun News Network, who recently faced government-imposed censorship stemming from an editorial comment he made on his broadcast. It turns out that members of the broadcast media do not share the same freedom of speech rights that average Canadian citizens enjoy. Say what!?

Thursday, August 23, 2012
The Mark Hasiuk Show: Racist Mob Mentality in America
Mark Hasiuk looks back at the “Scottsboro Boys” case, a gross miscarriage of justice that epitomized the racism of America’s South in the 1930s, and compares it to the recent shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman, wondering just how far America has actually progressed in racist mob mentality – if at all.

Friday, August 24, 2012
Culture Guard: Vimeo’s Hypocritical Policies Regarding Content on their Website
Kari Simpson brings you up to speed on RoadKillRadio.com‘s trouble with their video server, Vimeo, which deleted more than 200 news and commentary videos from their servers for no legitimate reason. Tune in to see examples of other videos that – apparently – have Vimeo’s blessings: anti-Jewish videos, anti-Catholic videos, anti-Black videos, bible-burning, bondage, gay incest, etc.

Saturday, August 25, 2012
Family Freedom Fighters: The Pain in Spain is Easy to Explain; plus, a Wall St. Journal Warning
This week Ron Gray presents two commentaries about world economics. First, he puts the current European economic crisis in perspective, and then refers to a Wall Street Journal warning that finally recognizes the root of the problem.

Aug 062012
 

Month after month—and in some cases week after week—Rafe Mair’s malicious tirades against Kari Simpson were blasted across the airwaves, and trumpeted from the pages of newspapers and Internet blogs.

Let me read some examples—and show how false they were:

• May 8, 1997, Rafe said, “I received a letter from her accusing me of being in favour of throwing young boys’ bodies to the tender mercies of predatory males…” He repeated this accusation at least six times.

The Fact: Kari’s letter asked—rhetorically—“I trust that upon your read of this that you will understand that the agenda far and exceeds the fluff; but then again, maybe you believe 13-year-old boys enjoy giving their bodies to men in exchange for frivolity.” The question was accompanied by a reprint of an article in Xtra West alleging that the boys in the Maple Leaf Gardens scandal willingly exchanged sexual favours for hockey tickets.

Rafe is a writer; he knows the difference between a rhetorical question and an accusation. But he chose to ignore that distinction, and make a false accusation of his own.

• Dec. 8, 1997, Rafe stated that Kari’s “motivations seem to come from the Reverend Jerry Falwell and the Moral Majority.”

The fact: Kari informed Rafe that, although she had heard Falwell’s name, she’d never heard him speak, nor read anything he wrote. Yet Rafe continued to link Kari’s name to Falwell’s.

• Dec. 11, 1997, Rafe said, “I have no idea whether or not she is anti-semitic; I don’t think she is, though; and I’ve never said she is, and I have no reason to say that she is. But, you know, there is an old saying which has resonance: ‘You look like a crow, call like a crow and nest with crows, chances are you’re a crow.’ I have no doubt that if Jerry Falwell, an admitted gay-basher and a demonstrable anti-semite, were to come to this area, that the people who support Kari Simpson’s stand on homosexuality would flock to hear him…”

The facts: Kari is provably NOT an anti-semite. But by alleging that Falwell is an anti-semite and anti-gay, and falsely linking Kari’s name to his, Rafe uses “guilt by association”—an association that never existed—to vilify her reputation.

At the very least, that’s yellow journalism; at the worst, it’s malicious defamation, and promoting hatred and contempt. Defamation is either an actionable civil offence, or a crime, or both—unless the legal brotherhood protects you.

Kari told Rafe—in the same letter that he mis-quotes as an accusation of pedophile sympathies, so we know he read it—that “I am no moral Puritan, but I am informed; my involvement in this difficult issue results from a concern based in fact, not ignorance nor bigotry.” Yet Rafe declared “this is a religious war, not educational.”

• Feb. 8, 1988, Rafe made reference to “Kari Simpson’s fundamentalists…”

The facts: What does Rafe mean by “fundamentalist”? Who knows? He simply uses the word as a pejorative. It actually refers to an intellectual defence of Biblical Christianity mounted by a group of scholars at Princeton University before the First World War. No one has ever demonstrated a link between Kari Simpson and fundamentalism—but that didn’t seem to matter to Rafe, when an easy slur was close at hand.

• Oct. 24, 1999, Rafe wrote (online): “What the likes of Kari Simpson—whose mind is so narrow it’s as invisible as electricity—want us to believe is that the words ‘homosexual’ and pedophile are synonymous…”

The fact: This is simply an outright lie: Kari has never equated homosexuality and pedophilia. Never. And Rafe has never been able to produce any defence of this accusation. And he never will be able to, because it’s untrue.

• Oct. 25, 1999, Rafe Mair opened his program by saying, “I really hate to give Kari Simpson any more publicity—something she soaks up like a blotter—but she’s become such a menace, I really think something must be said…”

After listing a number of civil rights successes Kari brought to Rafe’s radio program, Rafe said, “I listened to the tape of the parents’ meeting… where Kari harangues the crowd.”

Not “spoke to”, but “harangued”. Note how Rafe puts a spin on every sentence, by the language he chooses. He continued: “… in my minds eye I could see Governor Wallace of Alabama, standing on the steps of a school-house, shouting to the crowds that ‘no nigras’ would get into Alabama schools as long as he was governor.”

The facts: Assuredly, there is no need for me to point out the non-sequitur and the fallacy of trying to hang George Wallace’s racism on Kari Simpson; but for those who do not know her, let me assert that Kari—who grew up and went to school in a predominantly Black neighbourhood in California, and earned her fellow-students’ respect—does not have a racist bone in her body!

I’ve only cited six of more than 40 hate-inducing editorials Rafe Mair broadcast or wrote about Kari Simpson. I’m sure that by now, you get the degree of vicious intent. The important point is that those entrusted with the “bully pulpit” of the media have an ethical obligation not to abuse that power in a calculated campaign to manufacture a false reputation for anyone whose political influence they fear; and still less to pander to the economic powerhouse of the ‘gay’ lobby.

Repeatedly, Kari Simpson wrote him letters that proclaimed: “You’re wrong, Rafe!”—and provided him and his employers with evidence.

At one time, Rafe Mair’s producer had scheduled a debate between later became an NDP MLA, objected (according to Rafe’s producer, quoted in a court transcript):

“That would be like debating a white supremacist.”

He refused to debate Kari. So Rafe cancelled Kari, allowing Stevenson to go on the air unchallenged.

It was uncharacteristic of Rafe Mair, the award-winning broadcaster, to cow to the dishonest whim of a politician. But he did.

Yet Rafe and Kari certainly discussed the issue in detail: March 24, 1997, Kari was guest on a program which Rafe devoted entirely to discussion of the promotion of pro-homosexual education in the public schools. The NDP had just passed a resolution at its convention, calling for — quote — “the necessary curricular changes to promote the education of issues surrounding lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered youth.” Unquote.

That sentence is worth careful parsing. Notice that it does not call for comprehensive education of our children about homosexuality—that is, education that would not only argue for the human rights of GLBT persons, but would also inform students of the dire health and financial consequences of homosexual behaviour.

So what was the outcome of all Kari’s information and her corrections of misinformation? Come back next week.

Jul 172012
 

[Please Note: Per these instructions of our WebHost, Bluehost, we have altered the presentation of the following post:]

RoadKill Radio’s original July 17, 2012 webcast was removed from our video server, Vimeo, at the request of a Mr. Flanders. So we reposted it elsewhere. The video on this page is the very one that Mr. Flanders is afraid for you to see!

Here is the description of our original webcast:

Kari Simpson and Ron Gray interview Brian Camenker of MassResistance.com about a recent campaign of harassment directed toward Camenker. Mr. Flanders, a registered sex offender in the State of Maine for the conviction of “sexual abuse of a minor,” has been using the courts to bully MassResistance.com into silence and force him to stop publishing information about Flanders’ illegal activities.

Oddly, Mr. Flanders’ efforts to cover up any attention to his crimes is only attracting more attention to them. Or perhaps attention is what he really wants. RoadKill Radio suggests that Mr. Flanders change his recent tactics and revisit his original conscientious efforts to expose the abuse of children by at least one youth group. Mr. Flanders has the very real potential of once again becoming a hero by saving children from pedophiles and drug abusers.

RoadKill Radio News in no way defamed Mr. Flanders, if that is what he is claiming (he never attempted to contact us with any concerns!). We merely interviewed Mr. Camenker about Mr. Flanders’ recent [unsuccessful] campaign to censor MassResistance.com. Our interview included the fact that Mr. Flanders is a convicted sex offender. The State of Maine verifies this with their own publicly-accessible Sex Offender Registry, which is posted as one of the terms of Mr. Flanders’ conviction. Mr. Flanders voluntarily and without provocation confessed to this crime in writing and personally distributed copies of this confession to the police, pro-family groups, and local media.

Inexplicably, Mr. Flanders now spends his time attacking the free speech rights of news outlets that cite any details of his case – the same details he asked to be made public. In fact, it is in the same spirit that Mr. Flanders cited in his original letter that compels some news outlets to keep his story alive. Mr. Flanders bravely came forth with facts that exposed the sexual and drug abuse perpetrated on gay youth by adults.

It appears that Mr. Flanders’ abuse of the court system has had some setbacks. The same judge who approved a restraining order against Mr. Camenker for posting Mr. Flanders’ letter has now refused to issue any follow-up injunction. The State of Massachusetts – Mr. Camenker’s home state – does not recognize that same restraining order and will not enforce it. And Mr. Flanders’ appeal of his convictions has reportedly been rejected by the Maine courts.

RoadKill Radio News will not be censored. The material in our webcast was factually accurate – verifiably so – and is published on the Internet by several other news reporting organizations that have not been censored.

RoadKill Radio News has invited Mr. Flanders to present his story in an uncensored interview. He has declined the invitation.

[Update: Vimeo has reviewed the situation and has now re-posted the original webcast.]

Drive For Justice 05: Kari Simpson, a Biography

 Comments Off on Drive For Justice 05: Kari Simpson, a Biography
Jul 022012
 

Kari Simpson, a middle child, was born in Southern California to Canadian parents who were then living and doing business in USA. She says her mother reminded her often about her earlier-than-normal talents for talking, walking—and determination.  Kari’s family lived in the exclusive upper-middle-class community of Rolling Hills, she spent her childhood days playing in the ocean and riding horses. Her parents, like so many other trendy Californians, divorced when she was seven.

Her mother remarried, and the family grew by two more kids—an older step-brother and sister—and her life’s adventures grew as well, to now include winter fun skiing at Mammoth, and week-ends sailing to Catalina.  

At around age 10 her mother decided to sell the family home and move into a house still owned by her stepfather.  It was quite a departure from the life she had grown up with thus far.  Gone were the open spaces of the sprawling canyon playground that was her backyard, gone was the security of a community where law and order prevailed, gone were the lively parties.

“We moved to Carson, CA,” she recalls, “I was enrolled in Annalee Elementary, where we were three among only about ten white kids. I had never seen a metal detector at school, until we went there.” In Grade 5, she recalls her friend, Sam, packing a gun for protection while she rode on the handlebars of his bicycle. “It wasn’t boring; I learned a lot.”

This experiment ended soon after step-father’s new Cadillac was stolen from their garage. The family moved close to previous their location, to the coastal community of Palos Verdes.

In the summer of 1974 they returned to Canada on a holiday to Vancouver Island; her Mom, deciding to “get back to nature”, bought a small farm near Qualicum Beach. Kari and her siblings were soon milking goats, keeping chickens and learning all the other aspects of a pretty primitive farm lifestyle.

Because she was ahead of the other students in her grade at school, Kari was placed on half-days, and spent the rest of her time working on earning her private pilot’s license; a quick study, she completed that program at age 15, but had to wait another year to obtain her license. In the meantime, she completed her multi-engine and IFR certifications.
She qualified for her commercial license, but once again had to wait until she was 18 to get the papers. At that point, she became one of the youngest commercial pilots in Canada.

Engaged and living with her fiancé Sean, an aircraft maintenance engineer, she continued to fly commercially until she became pregnant. Her doctor recommended an abortion to protect her career; Kari tells me she just about decked the doc!  
It was also a pivotal moment for Kari in the politics of life, one that would grow into Kari becoming a formidable and fierce defender of life and protecting the rights of the unborn.

Now happily pregnant, Kari and Sean did what trendy parents do: they planned their careers to now include a nanny.  Kari says, laughing, “It made perfect sense,  stay home with baby for three months, and then get a nanny so I could carry on with MY self-focused life. That plan only lasted until a beautiful miracle named Katherine was placed in my arms, it took less than instant to realize  that nobody else was going to raise our baby!”

Life progressed, and soon there were four happy children in the busy Simpson household.  One morning, while they were living in Richmond, BC, in 1987, Kari got a frantic phone call from a friend. Her husband was being investigated and social workers wanted to apprehend their children. The father had been accused of touching his daughter in the area covered by her bathing suit, a disclosure reported by a teacher.

Kari began checking the “child protection program” (called CARE), offered at her friend’s school; she was given details by a psychologist at the University of Alberta; she was also informed that school principal Allan Garneau knew about the program.

Looking for more information, Kari also called CKNW and talked to Rafe Mair’s producer; she asked “Have you had anyone on your broadcast to talk about this school program?” The producer said, “No; what do you know about it?” The producer’s own daughter had been through the program, Kari learned, and grew so afraid of her father that she slept with a baseball bat.

“Will you come do the show?” asked Mair’s producer.
“The principal would be better,” said Kari.
“We’ll get him too; but we’d like a parent,” said Rafe’s producer.
“If the principal will do it, I will, too.”

Allan Garneau had done research on the “child protection program”, and refused to have it in his school.

The day before they were both to appear on the Rafe Mair broadcast, Allan Garneau called to say that he’d been told that if he did the show there would be “consequences.” He subsequently left the public system and started a successful private school.

Kari did the show, and began to get phone calls from people whose children had been apprehended. Kari phoned the school of social work and asked, “What are you teaching in this program?”

CKNW kept getting calls, and asked Kari to come back and do another show… and another, then another. Soon she was a regular weekly guest on the Rafe Mair program. Other program hosts also wanted Kari as a guest, but Rafe insisted she was his “property”.

As a result of the programs Kari did with Rafe Mair, the Social Credit government of the day became rather upset.  Finally, Social Services Minister Norm Jacobson challenged Kari to a public inquiry. Ombudsman Stephen Owen conducted the inquiry, and in 1991 his Public Report #24 showed there was, indeed, a serious problem.

Jacobson apologized to Kari, and set in motion better laws to protect families from government abuse. Regrettably, the Social Credit government was defeated by the anti-family, pro big union, pro big government NDP

In 1993 the new NDP government brought in the Infants Act, which ignored parental rights, overstepped boundaries and in effect made parents irrelevant.

“The Infants Act was amended  to treat all minors the same way,” claimed Health Minister Elizabeth Cull. “Under the old law, people between the ages of 16 and 18 needed parental consent before getting medical treatment. For those under 16, Common Law applied, which meant doctors could treat them without consulting parents or guardians.”

“That was not true,” says Kari. “Obviously, the government was hell-bent on violating the rights of parents, so we took them to court. In March of 1993, we petitioned the court for a declaration that Sec 16 violates Sec 2 (a) & (b) and Sec 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

But a radical, pro-choice judge and the Attorney-General’s lawyer (an NDP hack who is now a provincial judge) ruled that a doctor can decide, as long as child agrees and the doctor believes that the proposed treatment is “in the best interest of child”.  

Parents became irrelevant.

A key point at issue in the case was whether adolescent girls could get abortions without their parents’ consent—or even informing the parents. The NDP and court officials sympathetic to the Left let it happen. Rafe Mair and Kari did many shows on the Infants Act.

In March, 1993, Rafe Mair endorsed Kari’s nomination for ‘Woman of Distinction Award’, saying he was “110% behind her.”

In the mid 1990’s, as a result of the respect Kari had earned for her work protecting children and families, she was appointed to serve in a quasi judicial capacity on the BC Child and Family Review Board. During this time Kari got a call from an Aboriginal woman whose five children had been apprehended, after which the baby died. Child Protection Services wouldn’t tell her what happened. Kari, as a member of Child and Family Review Board, demanded review—and finally, after much political outrage, the Minister ordered it.

Late in 1996, Kari began to get numerous calls from teachers who were concerned about a BCTF convention resolution to promote, through curricular changes, favorable recognition of homosexuality.

When she responded to the concerns of those teachers, Rafe Mair suddenly turned on her; she was dropped from his broadcasts, and instead he began a series of radio and print editorials—more than 40—in which he maligned her by comparing her to Nazis, skinheads, and the Ku Klux Klan.

Kari wanted Rafe charged with criminal defamation and hatred (under Section 318 of the Criminal Code); but Crown refused to charge Rafe.

So Kari sued Mair and CKNW for defamation in civil court. And this is where our story starts to unfold—a story that exposes judicial corruption, the denying of rights, a multitude of lies, and great mischief!  A story that will enable you to better understand one determined individual’s drive for justice.

There are so many more good works Kari has done on behalf of you and me, and the protection of our families.  In my opinion, Kari Simpson is a warrior, defending families, and parents’ and children’s rights. But don’t just take my word for it; listen to what a prominent BC lawyer wrote in support of her nomination for ‘Woman of Distinction’ in 1993:

I cannot start an appraisal of Kari Simpson as a person without saying immediately that she is one if the people in this world I admire most. I say this for several reasons, which I will outline below.

I first met Kari Simpson several years ago when she began expressing concern about how misuse of power in alleged child abuse cases was sideswiping innocent families. This was a most unfashionable thing to be concerned about, since the “political correctness” of the day (which largely continues” held that there was no such thing as innocence in such matters. It was, largely, an unpopular cause which Kari took up, and together we used my radio show to attract attention to injustice. It was my radio show—but the issue and the energy belonged to Kari. It was she who formed the Citizens Research Institute, and enormous undertaking. It was she who bore the financial and emotional burdens of being “den mother”, counsel to and advocate for the unpopular, yet badly oppressed minority.

Kari is an activist in the very best sense of the word. It was because of her that the Ombudsman was instructed by the then minister if Social Services to investigate her concerns and it was as a direct result o that, that a task force was set u, and that legislative changes have been proposed and made; from a courageous stand on an unpopular side of an emotional issue, Kari’s efforts brought about real change.

When you think about it, it is remarkable that one person has gained such huge credibility with such a large audience as I am fortunate to possess. After all, Kari has been up against the establishment on the “wrong” side of a highly emotional issu. That she has obviously touched a nerve is clear from the response she gets.

In my vocation, I meet all manner of activists. Most of them have a political agenda of some sort of other. Kari’s inspiration comes instead from a deep commitment to the principles of democracy, fair play, and the worth of the family. My only hesitation in supporting Kari’s nomination as “Woman of Distinction” is that this is too limiting. When one considers what she has accomplished—and forced, by dint of her commitment and dedication, others to accomplish—she is a distinguished British Columbian and Canadian, who has truly been an inspiration to all she has come in contact with.

What was the name of the lawyer who painted this glowing picture of Kari Simpson?

Hold onto your hats: it was Rafe Mair! And you’ll learn more about him—much more—next week.

Drive For Justice 04: Letter to Prime Minister Harper

 Comments Off on Drive For Justice 04: Letter to Prime Minister Harper
Jun 252012
 

Prominent British Columbia social activist Kari Simpson—a spokesperson for you, if you believe, like most civil-minded Canadians, that conventional morality creates and protects social harmony—has written to Prime Minister Harper, asking him to provide the leadership his office demands, in protecting all Canadians’ freedom of expression, and their right to a fair and impartial hearing in our courts. In her letter, she draws to the Prime Minister’s attention, in what RoadKillRadio is calling Drive for Justice, some egregious violations of those rights.

In a defamation lawsuit that worked its way through the BC Supreme Court, the BC Court of Appeals, and finally to the Supreme Court of Canada, those rights were repeatedly violated… with the knowledge and complicity of other judges and lawyers.

Her questions include:

A judge of the BC Supreme Court—who has admitted financially supporting her “spouse” while he was using the Internet for (among other things) promoting hatred and contempt for Jews generally; and vilifying, defaming and libeling several prominent Jewish businessmen—at the same time, this same judge, presided over a defamation suit that involves a high-profile former lawyer—you know: a member of the legal “brethren”—a former MLA and provincial Cabinet Minister, and a member of the media who has publicly stated that he does not want influential Judeo-Christians (as the plaintiff is) to hold public office.

If that judge also transfers property title from her “spouse” to herself, so he escapes payment of a court-awarded judgement after he was found to have defamed the Jewish businessmen, isn’t that called “fraudulent conveyance”? And doesn’t that vitiate the protection afforded judges, which they have only as long as they are “of good behaviour”, according to the Constitution Act?

Question 1 – Don’t the ethical standards of the Canadian Judicial Council require that a judge, when personally embroiled in such conflicts, must disqualify herself from a case that is similar in fact—i.e., defamation involving religious bigotry?

Question 2 – Should the Chief Justice of the BC Supreme Court, also a member of the Canadian Judicial Council, preside over a legal matter involving one of his own judges?

Question 3 – Doesn’t a party to a legal proceeding have the right to know what legal test they have to meet in court? If the Supreme Court of Canada changes the legal test in mid-trial, as Chief Justice McLachlin did in this case, isn’t there a obligation to allow the parties to the trial to re-state their case, incorporating the new standard?

Question 4 – What gives justices of the high court the right to repeat lies that defame an individual, and to embellish them, as happened in this case?

Question 5 – How can the Canadian Judicial Council be trusted to investigate its own activities? How can the legal “brethren” be trusted to sit in judgement of their own activities?

But the most important question of all in Mrs. Simpson’s letter to the Prime Minister is this:

Will you call for a parliamentary enquiry into this evidence of judicial corruption and mocking of the Rule of Law?

When judicial independence is abused to protect those who violate judicial probity, there must be a venue of appeal and accountability beyond the courts themselves; that is the essence of our Drive for Justice. There is a famous precedent in Canadian law: in 1929, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that women were not “persons” in law. Five spunky women from Alberta appealed that ruling to the Privy Council at Westminster, which at that time had authority to review Supreme Court decisions; Canadians lost that right of appeal in 1947, and it has never been replaced. The loss of that right—to appeal to a body that is accountable to the Constitution—was a deficiency in Prime Minister Trudeau’s 1982 Constitution Act. That deficiency still needs to be corrected today.

Will the Prime Minister act to protect the integrity of the judicial system and the confidence of the Canadian people in the administration of law?

Stay tuned.

This Week On RoadKill Radio! (May 28 – June 3, 2012)

 Comments Off on This Week On RoadKill Radio! (May 28 – June 3, 2012)
May 282012
 

Monday, May 28, 2012
Drive For Justice: Prologue

Our new Monday night series is called Drive For Justice, and here is the opening salvo. Judicial heads will roll as Kari Simpson takes on the corrupt (and often treasonous) actions of Canada’s runaway legal courts!

Tuesday, May 29, 2012
The David Berner Show with Kari Simpson

This episode of The David Berner Show was temporarily pulled from distribution due to protests from sex activists. But the delightful Mr. Berner will not be censored, so the episode has returned for all of us to see. Two subjects: political indoctrination in public schools, and a botched (ignored) fraud case by the Vancouver Police Department. Informative, entertaining – a must see!

Wednesday, May 30, 2012
RoadKill Radio News: Save My Analog!

RoadKill Radio presents a brief – but very important – suggestion on why you should care about allowing a Smart Meter to be attached to your house, and how you can go about preventing it.

Thursday, May 31, 2012
The Mark Hasiuk Show: Herbert Grubel on Canada’s Immigration Laws

Join Mark Hasiuk as he interviews Professor Herbert Grubel about the many shades of Canadian immigration policy. What’s wrong with it, what’s right, and how can it be improved? Is Canadian Culture at risk, and if so, should we care?

Friday, June 1, 2012
The National Absurder: Why I Hate G.E.

Jim Lawter exposes the true (evil) genius of Thomas Edison, who DID NOT invent the light bulb, but who did create General Electric as the ultimate money-grabbing machine.

Saturday, June 2, 2012
Family Freedom Fighters: Whose Children Are They? Plus: Your Gold Medal Performance

Ron Gray shoots a warning flare about the Canadian government’s continued intrusion into the raising of your children, removing even more parental rights. Also, a clear lesson on the comparative ethics of earning and spending money versus taking tax and redistributing it.

Sunday, June 3, 2012
The Prophets War: How to Bully with Impunity

Vulture Guard has a madman amongst its already evil lot of instigators. In this latest intercepted directive, General Decay gleefully lauds the recent bully tactics of Dan Savage and offers them as a lesson to follow. We must expose this threat in order to weaken it! Stay strong – Plan to Survive.

This Week On RoadKill Radio! (April 30 – May 6, 2012)

 Comments Off on This Week On RoadKill Radio! (April 30 – May 6, 2012)
May 042012
 

Monday, April 30, 2012
Flash Drive with Ron Gray: Home Schooling in Sweden: Outlawed!

Family Freedom Fighters host Ron Gray reviews Sweden`s decision to outlaw home schooling, effectively turning their education system into a giant social cookie-cutter.  After the exact same decision in Nazi Germany proved disastrous, one must wonder what the Swedes are thinking!

Tuesday, May 1, 2012
RoadKill Radio News: MP Stephen Woodworth Stands Up for Human Life

Kari Simpson and Ron Gray interview Kitchener MP Stephen Woodworth, who last week asked the House of Commons to vote for Motion 312, which would set up a committee to examine the question of when human life begins.  Is the the first step toward developing an actual abortion law in Canada?

Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Culture Guard: Your Health: Fight Smart Meters and “Take Back Your Power”

In Part Two of Kari Simpson`s interview with “Take Back Your Power” film producer Josh del Sol, the focus is on the many security risks – personally, nationally, and globally – that the Smart Meter “Smart Grid” exposes us to.  Why are our Liberal governments doing the bidding of corporations?  Who benefits when hackers and terrorists use our Smart Meters against us?  And why are we footing the bill!?

Thursday, May 3, 2012
The Mark Hasiuk Show: We Need a Law for Preborn Human Rights!

Mark Hasiuk speaks with Mike Schouten, director of Preborn Human Rights and his We Need a Law (.ca) campaign.  Mr. Schouten is spearheading the grassroots campaign to establish pre-born human rights in Canada.  There is an attempt on the federal level to open this discussion, even though Prime Minister Harper has vowed to avoid the issue.  Is the recently advertised prenatal sex selection by abortion in BC legal?

Friday, May 4, 2012
Culture Guard: Former Fraud Cop Finds Smart Meters GUILTY!

Kari Simpson interviews Len Miller, a former member of Vancouver Police Department’s Fraud Division.  Mr. Miller, also an experienced electrical engineer, explains his case against Smart Meters, which are being illegally forced upon the citizens of British Columbia against their will.  Why is the Liberal Party conducting this electronic form of home invasion?

Saturday, May 5, 2012
Family Freedom Fighters: Can We Avoid a Demographic Winter?

Ron Gray delivers two thought-provoking commentaries.  First, Ron examines the boom-bust cycle of the world’s population – and notes several reasons why population growth is necessary.  Then, in the first of a three-part series entitled “Faith and Science”, Ron notes the need for faith and science to find common ground in order to advance.

Sunday, May 6, 2012
The Prophets War: Support Your Local Smart Meter

Once again, our underground operative has intercepted a perverse directive from General Disorder of The Vulture Guard!  Smart Meters, the very symbol of corporatocracy at its worst, are being promoted by the evil general.  What will it take for the Resistance to stop this madness?  Your support is crucial!  Spread the word – Stay strong – Plan to Survive!

We Need a Law for Preborn Human Rights!

 Comments Off on We Need a Law for Preborn Human Rights!
May 032012
 

Mark Hasiuk speaks with Mike Schouten, director of Preborn Human Rights and his WeNeedaLaw.ca campaign. Mr. Schouten is spearheading the grassroots campaign to establish pre-born human rights in Canada. There is an attempt on the federal level to open this discussion, even though Prime Minister Harper has vowed to avoid the issue. Is the recently advertised prenatal gender selection by abortion in BC legal?

Apr 182012
 

Culture Guard news release

April 18, 2012

For immediate release

 

Culture Guard charges School Board with promoting hatred

 

VANCOUVER, April 18, 2012 (CultureGuard) — Culture Guard has filed a human rights complaint against the Vancouver School Board, charging that the VSB has used and promoted in its meetings, policies and its schools, the use of hateful, defamatory and demeaning terminology and has facilitated and endorsed the “Out In Schools” program, a program that is designed to promote hatred and contempt for identifiable groups, contrary to the BC Human Rights Code.

 

The offensive terms specified include (but are not limited to) terms like “homophobe”, “homophobic” and “homophobia”.

 

“Such terms are designed to promote hatred and contempt, they are used to isolate, marginalize, and belittle individuals and groups that hold opinions at variance to those of the sex activists within the education establishment,” Culture Guard president Kari Simpson stated. “They have no legitimate use; they give the appearance of medical or psychological terminology, but they don’t appear in recognized medical or psychological dictionaries. They are simply slurs invented for hateful propaganda purposes.”

 

The Culture Guard complaint asks the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal to instruct the VSB to immediately cease the use of materials and policies “that project, advise, counsel and/or indoctrinate students, staff or the broader community, in any manner, that the terms ‘homophobe’, ‘homophobia’, ‘homophobic’, etc. are acceptable.” It also seeks an official apology from the VSB to “all individuals and groups harmed, belittled, demeaned and/or otherwise adversely affected by the Vancouver School Board’s failure to respect all individuals and groups, by cultivating hatred, ignorance and contempt for their opinions, religious beliefs and/or cultural practices as they pertain to issues directly related to biologically and economically harmful sexual practices and the requirement of students and staff to ‘celebrate’ the aforementioned practices.”

Ms. Simpson is acting on behalf of Chinese Christians but anticipates a number of other groups and individuals will be added if the Vancouver School Board fails to remedy the situation.   

 

                                                =30=

 

Contact:      Kari Simpson

                   cultureguard@gmail.com

                   www.CultureGuard.com

                   (604) 514-1614

Hierarchy of Rights

 Comments Off on Hierarchy of Rights
Apr 092012
 

Family Freedom Fighter host Ron Gray spells out the natural hierarchy of human rights, which have been recognized as far back as Aristotle’s time. Why has Canada strayed from this irrefutable hierarchy?