Ron Gray delivers his own brief eulogy to Jack Layton, refreshingly honest and insightful. While Canada displayed unusual – and unwarranted – hero status to the late minority leader and frequent also-ran, questions still remain about Mr. Layton's actual effectiveness in improving Canada's culture, economic stability, and endurance. How does a man whose politics so closely resembled those of former failed world leaders deserve the accolades that are still now heaped upon Jack Layton?
Ron Gray wraps up his three-part series of interviews with noted conservative writer William S. Lind. In this segment, the role of Cultural Marxism in today's North American society is examined, and the prospects of surviving the time-proven damages of its degenerative philosophies are evaluated. Ultimately, will a retro-culture of back-to-basics conservatism be the only way to heal our society from ravages of Marxist ideals?
Ron Gray once again clearly points out the subversive agenda of the British Columbia Teachers Federation, a union dedicating much of its resources to the deconstruction of family values, morality, and tradition. As the number of enrolled students drops in BC's public school system (wary parents are running!), the BCTF continues to impose its culturally destructive agenda on the children of the remaining oblivious parents.
Ron Gray continues his fascinating three-part interview with William S. Lind, noted author. Mr. Lind details how Cultural Marxism has infiltrated our society through educational, entertainment, and political avenues. The slow, patient process of converting North America to Marxist ideals is proof of how insidious and effective this new invasion is. The eventual fall of our democracy will be proof – once again – that Marxism always was and always will be inherently flawed.
Ron Gray begins a fascinating three-part interview with William S. Lind, noted author. Mr. Lind begins the series with an historical review of the origins and rise of Cultural Marxism, which – in the guise of political correctness and "business as usual" politics – permeates the world today through our public education system and entertainment industry.
The Canadian Medical Association has issued a statement—political, not medical—saying that a baby does not become a human being until after it is born.
Let’s parse that carefully. We’ll start with the organization making the statement: The Canadian Medical Association. Who are they?
Well, they’re actually an imitative branch-plant of the American Medical Association. It’s an example of the “Ooooh! They’ve got one! Let’s us have one, too!” syndrome.
But where did the AMA come from?
From the Rockefeller Foundation’s largesse. Here’s how:
In 1913, when a cabal of American Robber Barons drafted legislation for a graduated income tax—a policy espoused by Karl Marx, interestingly—they included a provision for tax-exempt charitable foundations. By keeping control of the shares they put into the foundations, they were able to exert influence on the stock market without appearing to violate the anti-trust laws. But the shares they retained would benefit from their advance knowledge of what they were going to do with their Foundation shares.
John D. Rockefeller wanted to split the income earned by the Rockefeller Foundation shares between rural education and medicine. Education was no problem: he just gave the money to rural school boards. He hired a guy to disburse the medical funds—but the guy he hired knew nothing about medicine. So he went to Leipzig, in Germany to find out what state-of-the-art medicine was doing there; as it turned out, Leipzig doctors were big on pharmaceuticals and surgery—two topics being taught at only one school in the USA: Johns-Hopkins. So Johns-Hopkins got the Rockefeller cash.
But it didn’t take long for the other universities to discover how to get on the gravy train: their curricula soon included pharmaceuticals and surgery. And that became the model for medical education in the USA.
Ironically, John D’s own personal physician was a homeopath—but homeopathy, like chiropractic, was excluded from the gravy train.
The graduates of the new allopathic medicine schools funded by Rockefeller became the founders of the AMA… and their pattern and policies were copied by the CMA.
So that’s the origin of the organization that now tells us a pre-born baby isn’t human.
I have a question for the CMA: if the parents are both human, the progeny is certainly not a rabbit. If the parents are both human, what IS the baby, if not human?
Am I putting down doctors? Not at all. They’re healers, and their training and compassion are important to us. But I am pointing out that their real expertise is confined to just one part of the healing arts. And within that part, there is a tiny—and, happily, a shrinking—number of doctors who are willing to be killers, instead of healers.
Thus the absurd CMA statement that pre-born babies aren’t human beings is merely a professional group’s attempt to protect a grisly billion-dollar-a year industry that enriches those few.
Parliament will soon decide whether to reconsider the 400-year-old criterion that undergirds that grisly industry. To many politicians, an organization like the CMA represents a convenient clumping together of potential votes; and when the opinion of such a group is falsely presented to them as being all on one side, it may seem to them to have weight… and that needs a counter-weight: your opinion.
This is an urgent time for you to act: visit, call or write your Member of Parliament and urge them to support Motion 312, by MP Stephen Woodworth, on September 21.
Woodworth wants Parliament to create a committee to review Section 223 of the Criminal Code, which says a child becomes a human being when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother.
Woodworth, quite correctly, argues: “If a child, five minutes before birth, can be defined as ‘not a human being’, then the question is: ‘Who’s next?’”
Don’t put this off: contact your Member of Parliament right away to make sure your opinion is heard. Best is to make an appointment to visit them at their constituency office; next-best is to phone them, and leave a message for them to call you back—then tell them this issue is important to you, and could influence your vote at the next election; If nothing else, write a letter (no postage needed), or send an e-mail. But make sure your MP knows your opinion.
Canadian-born comedian Mort Sahl used to quip, in the ’50s, that “The AMA is opposed to faith healing—or any other cure that is quick and inexpensive.” Don’t let the voice of a lobby group like that influence your Member of Parliament.
Remember: your voice matters.
Attention Vancouver Police Chief Constable Jim Chu: This 3-part series is dedicated to you in the hope that you will learn how wasteful and ineffective your officers can be when they don’t take notes.
Ron Gray interviews Culture Guard President Kari Simpson about the better-late-than-never Freedom of Information package from the Vancouver Police Department regarding the alleged investigation of a complaint that she allegedly filed with them. Lo and behold, the facts are finally emerging!
In the first of three parts (stay tuned on March 17 and 20 for Parts 2 and 3, respectively), we finally hear the wild fabrication that VPD Constable Eric Lott filed from his shaky memory more than a week after meeting with Kari – and refusing to take her complaint. Having taken no notes, and having virtually no training or experience in taking a complaint of fraud and child luring, Constable Lott admits to relying on Google for much of his report.
Dr. Helena Guldberg: Get Rid of Anti-Bullying Campaigns
Researcher and author Dr. Helene Guldberg joins Kari Simpson and Ron Gray to discuss her book, “Reclaiming Childhood: Freedom and Play in an Age of Fear“. Dr. Guldberg shows there there is no evidence at all that so-called “anti-bullying” programs reduce bulling. Furthermore, the anti-bullying industry may be doing more harm than good for children, denying them the character-building experiences that help them face the realities of later life.
An interesting observation by Dr. Guldberg is that the anti-bully advocates in Great Britain are every bit as vindictive, threatening, and – dare we say it? – bullying as those in Canada! Watch this show, learn the truth, and spread the word: Get rid of the Anti-Bullying Industry before they do irreparable damage to an entire generation!
Monday, March 5, 2012
The Way It Looks to Me: Questions for the BC Teachers Federation
Culture Guard co-host Ron Gray comments runs down the list outrageous demands of the BC Teachers Federation for their new contract, making it abundantly clear why negotiations have dragged on for a year already. Now that the government is moving to legislate a new contract in this stalemate, the teachers have decided to go on strike.
While the BCTF maintains that their personal financial demands and insistence on much more time off for all teachers is “all for the children”, it is certainly obvious why public school enrollment and academic scores are declining rapidly in British Columbia.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Dr. Helena Guldberg: Get Rid of Anti-Bullying Campaigns
Researcher and author Dr. Helene Guldberg joins Kari Simpson and Ron Gray to discuss her book, “Reclaiming Childhood: Freedom and Play in an Age of Fear“. Dr. Guldberg shows there there is no evidence at all that so-called “anti-bullying” programs reduce bulling. Furthermore, the anti-bullying industry may be doing more harm than good for children, denying them the character-building experiences that help them face the realities of later life.
An interesting observation by Dr. Guldberg is that the anti-bully advocates in Great Britain are every bit as vindictive, threatening, and – dare we say it? – bullying as those in Canada! Watch this show, learn the truth, and spread the word: Get rid of the Anti-Bullying Industry before they do irreparable damage to an entire generation!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
BPV’s Gordon World Takes on Lady Gaga
Lady Gaga is making serious money with the help of BC’s Ministry of Education, which has endorsed the 21st Century burlesque queen – immoral behaviour, racist costumes, questionable lyrics and all – by corraling pink-clad children into “flash mob” dances. Gordon World, member of the parents’ rights group Burnaby Parents’ Voice, joins Kari Simpson and Ron Gray in an examination of how our public education system is selling the wrong message to our children.
Further, Culture Guard examines how Pink Shirt Day, a national anti-bullying campaign, has been hijacked by sex activists who have bullied certain naive local school boards into promoting homosexuality to our kids instead of sticking to the original message that ALL bullying is wrong.
Culture Guard Special
Dec. 7, 2011
For immediate release
(Click here for the video update and VPD Const. Lott’s telephone message)
Complaint? What complaint?
VPD comments on the ‘completed investigation’ into a complaint they never received!
The Out In Schools saga continues!
As you may recall, in September Kari Simpson attempted to file a complaint with the Vancouver Police Department (VPD) against the Out in Schools program and the program’s umbrella organization, the Out on Screen Film Society, for luring students to—and then exposing them to—pornography. She also wanted an investigation of the Vancouver School Board and the BC Teachers’ Federation, which had both endorsed the smutty program.
Constable Eric Lott, who “volunteered” to respond to (or, more likely, get rid of) the complaint, took no notes about the charges, and refused to accept the written documentation Simpson had taken to the Cambie Street headquarters of the VPD.
Within 30 seconds of meeting Const. Lott, Kari became suspicious that he had an ulterior agenda; during their 35-minute meeting the Constable did not exhibit the expected police professionalism—unless acting like a thug is now recognized by the VPD as a profession.
For those of us who know Kari—well, she is just the wrong person to try to bully or intimidate!
Unimpressed by Const. Lott’s thuggish tactics, Kari turned the tables on him, and asked what division he works in. It turned out that he is in traffic. Kari then asked what expertise, as a traffic cop, he has in investigating pornography.
Hit with this reality, Lott suggested another way to handle the complaint: he suggested that Kari should talk to the Diversity Unit.
When the Diversity Unit didn’t answer Const. Lott’s phone call, Kari obtained the number and said she would to contact them, and then left the VPD building taking with her all her documentation, unfiled complaint and witnesses.
When Kari returned to her office at approx 11 p.m., Const. Lott had left a phone message detailing a proposed “new approach” to receiving the still-unfiled complaint. He now wanted, as the “first responder,” to take possession of the complaint and pass it on to Vice and the Diversity/Hate units.
By this time Kari had been advised of some troubling information: apparently the VPD had already participated in an activity sponsored by the very group responsible for exposing the school kids to PORN!
Kari decided that she would pursue charges through a different venue, and did not provide the complaint and/or any documentation to the VPD.
Here’s where the story becomes really entertaining!
According to VPD media spokesman Const. Lindsay Houghton, and unbeknownst to Kari, the VPD alleged that she did “file a complaint”—even though there was no statement given, there was no file number assigned, and there was no information provided to the VPD—except for the cursory discussion and rude responses by Const. Lott on September 13, 2011.
So without receiving any of Kari’s documentation, or taking any notes of his own about the charges, Const. Lott apparently had the complaint “investigated”.
It gets more mystifying: Kari was recently advised that some unknown “investigator” proceeded to clear Out In Schools of any wrongdoing—without ever talking to Kari or obtaining any of her documented evidence.
Clearly, the VPD has decided to give special rights to radical sex activists among the LGBTQ++ community.
In previously related matters, the VPD allowed a member to broadcast silly personal definitions of what he views as “hate”: a definition that would compromise investigations by calling murders “hate crimes” before the police inquiry is finished.
The VPD also allowed its members to stand by and watch decent citizens being assaulted by gay activists during a parental rights rally. It regularly turns a blind eye to open breaches of the Criminal Code during the annual “pride” parade; ignores complaints by concerned citizens about public sex in park areas that should be safe for kids and families; and now carries out fake “investigations” into school programs that lure children into a world of gay pornography and sex without even talking to the complainant—and then issues a statement about how “age-appropriate” the program is!
One has to wonder: would Aaron Webster be alive today if the VPD had ensured that the law was being properly enforced at this well-known public site, where homosexual men meet for illegal sexual encounters?
Why do those words “bias”, “pandering” and “gay toady” keep coming to mind? Why is the VPD so fearful of the sex activists that they ignore open breaches of the law? Why is the VPD willing to compromise its reputation to scam the public into believing that they “investigated” a complaint that was never received or properly investigated?
Does VPD Chief Jim Chu really believe that a school program that lured students to a Queer Film Festival party featuring games like “Lesbian Debauchery” and “The Queeriodic Table” is appropriate for teen-agers?
Does the VPD really believe that exposing teens—and younger—to graphic gay porn is “age appropriate”, as VPD spokesman Const. Houghton says?
Does Chief Chu and the VPD members really believe that the Out In Schools program that linked students to a hardcore porn site, other sex sites and gay sex-activist political sites is “age appropriate”? How many parents did they talk to in this farce of an “investigation”? How many parents were ever informed of the truth about this program, and then still found themselves to be “engaged” as the VPD claims?
In this Culture Guard special update, you’ll hear the voice message from Constable Lott, admitting he doesn’t have the complaint… but now wants to “take possession” of it! But remember: Kari never gave it to him! Now she wants to know—as the named complainant—what did the VPD investigate? And on what did they base their so-called “investigation”?!?
Kari says she can hardly wait to share the details of what emerges from her Freedom of Information request!
Stay tuned!
Click here for the Culture Guard Update video
=30=
Contact: Kari Simpson Tel: (604) 514-1614
Email cultureguard@gmail.com
Show #120, audio only:
7:30 – 8:10 pm: GUNS! – GARY MAUSER is a Professor Emeritus in the Faculty of Business Administration and the Institute for Urban Canadian Research Studies at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia. He talks to us about the Conservative government’s decision to scrap the Gun Registry. Professor Mauser’s interest in firearms and “gun control” grew out of his research in political marketing. For the past 15 years, Professor Mauser has conducted research on the politics of gun control, the effectiveness of gun control laws, and the use of firearms in self defense.
8:10 – 8:35 pm: FREEDOM! – STEVE ANDERSON is the founder and executive director of OpenMedia.ca, and became a bit of a living legend when he mobilized the Stop The Meter campaign, which is widely considered the biggest online campaign in Canadian history. Steve is an open Internet advocate, writer, and social media consultant and will be joining us from the CRTC hearings that are now taking place. His writing has appeared in numerous local and national print and online publications Steve is a contributing author of CPPA book The Internet Tree. He also writes a monthly syndicated column called Media Links. You can find Steve’s blog at http://openmedia.ca/SteveAnderson
8:35 – 9:00 pm: WAR! – BILL TIELEMAN is one of BC’s best known political commentators and strategists and one of the leading voices in the GREAT EXTINGUISH THE HST WAR of 2010 & ‘11! Bill writes a politics column Tuesdays in 24 Hours newspaper and The Tyee online magazine. Bill has been Communications Director in the B.C. Premier’s Office and at the BC Federation of Labour and owns West Star Communications, a consulting firm providing strategy and communication services for labour, business, non-profits and government.
9:00 – 9:30 pm: LIFE! – RENEE SCHMITZ, Director for Canadian Nurses for Life, will talk about the growing problems associated with life in a culture of death. Increasingly doctors, nurses, pharmacist, teachers and marriage commissioners are being forced to deal and participate in issues of conscience. Court cases are taking place, we as tax-payers are paying for this… Should a doctor who values the life of a baby in the womb be forced to abort the baby? Should a nurse who works to save lives be required to assist in the ending of a life?! Important topic; it defines, in part, our life, our culture!