Tactics of Government Baby Snatching in Canada

 Comments Off on Tactics of Government Baby Snatching in Canada
Jun 072011
 

Here is a brief interview by PA-PA.ca of Kevin and Magda of Salmon Arm, BC, and their volunteer advocate Starr-Ella. Kevin and Magda have now had two infants stolen from them.

British Columbia’s Ministry of Children and Family Development has an ongoing practice of falsifying evidence in order to justify the removal of infants and children from loving families. For each child abducted into their system, the Ministry bills the government approximately $90,000 each year. Their motive is obvious. Their tactics are evil. They answer to no-one.

RoadKill Radio’s on-air interview of Magda, Kevin and Starr-Ella can be viewed here.

Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Ministry-Sanctioned Baby Snatching

 3 Responses »
Jun 062011
 

Recorded 31 May 2011, this is the RoadKill Radio interview of Magda and Kevin of Salmon Arm, British Columbia. Their case is well-documented by People Assisting Parents Association at PA-PA.ca.

On the afternoon of 5 June 2011, Ministry officials abducted this couple’s newborn baby – the second one they abducted in two years – at the Royal Columbian Hospital in Burnaby, BC. The RCMP removed Kevin and his parents from the hospital. The local police refused to get involved. The Ministry continues to terrorize this poor, innocent couple.

Also watch PA-PA.ca’s 31 May 2011 interview that reveals Tactics of Government Baby Snatching in Canada.

Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Bayne Family Crisis Part 4 of 4

 Comments Off on Bayne Family Crisis Part 4 of 4
Mar 282011
 

The Bayne family is under siege! A Ministry official has admitted – in court – falsifying a document that facilitated the kidnapping of the Baybe children by British Columbia’s Ministry of Children and Family Development, yet the children are still in custody after 3 1/2 years. The Bayne’s three-pound premature baby was seized in hospital only five hours after his birth!

Click here to read the full story.

Bayne Family Crisis Part 3 of 4

 Comments Off on Bayne Family Crisis Part 3 of 4
Mar 282011
 

The Ministry of Children and Family Development Executive Director of Practice, Bruce McNeill, is behind the destruction of countless happy families in British Columbia. Is he power mad, or just plain mad? Or is this a heartless money grab for his organization? Can McNeill’s Ministry of Destruction be stopped?

Click here to read the full story.

Bayne Family Crisis Part 2 of 4

 Comments Off on Bayne Family Crisis Part 2 of 4
Mar 272011
 

What do we do when the child abuser is the social worker? What do we do when judges hide behind the law, putting their reputations ahead of a child’s best interests? Why are we as tax-payers paying in excess of $6,000 per month to a foster family, when the children’s grandparents are willing to have them? This could be your family. When are we willing to say “enough is enough!”?

Click here to read the full story.

Bayne Family Crisis Part 1 of 4

 Comments Off on Bayne Family Crisis Part 1 of 4
Mar 272011
 

Paul and Zabeth Bayne are in-studio to share the story of their on-going struggle with British Columbia’s Ministry of Children and Family Development, to have their four children returned to them. This is an important story that illustrates why the unbridled power of incompetent social workers must be curtailed.

Click here to read the full story.

PARENTS’ ALERT #2 • PARENTS’ ALERT #2

 Comments Off on PARENTS’ ALERT #2 • PARENTS’ ALERT #2
Mar 132011
 

Parents for Democracy in Education/March 2011
Thanks to BC Parents and Teachers for Life (BCPTL), we’ve been informed of a new propaganda booklet produced by a pro-homosexual group, Pride Education Network, that is being distributed by the teachers’ union in B.C. (BCTF). This booklet, Gender Spectrum, makes unsupported claims that gender is a “continuum”, and that normal concepts of “male” and “female” are obsolete. (We have included a copy below, so you can read their one-sided presentation for yourself.)

In contrast, Dr. Leonard Sax, author of Why Gender Matters, Boys Adrift and Girls on the Edge—a medical doctor and a PhD in psychology—has published a rebuttal to such ideas in the Journal of Sex Research (his article is also included below). We call your attention to a statement on Page 9 of Dr. Sax’s peer-reviewed study, which—after a review of the medical evidence—declares:

“The available data support the conclusion that human sexuality is a dichotomy, not a continuum. More than 99.98% of humans are either male or female.”

The PEN/BCTF mis-information campaign is working through teachers in an attempt to radically change the very nature of our schools, among other things encouraging children to practice cross-dressing as “role-playing” the identities of children in one of five (or more) imaginary “intersex” genders.

Such a campaign puts the health and safety of 99.98% of students at risk, for the sake of a pro-homosexual doctrine being promoted by the BCTF.

To protect their children from this barrage of propaganda promoting acceptance of sexual perversions, parents should take steps to establish clearly their wishes for the education of their children.

Bear in mind that the United Nations’ 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which Canada is a signatory, states clearly in Article 26, section 3:

Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

While there may be elements of that Declaration not all Canadians agree with, very few would argue with Article 26—and because Canada is a signatory, the Declaration’s concepts have protective force as strong as Canadian law. If your wishes are made known to your children’s school, they must be respected.

Below is a copy of a Parents’ Directive document available from BC Parents and Teachers for Life at www.bcptl.org
Use (or adapt) this document, then sign and date two printed copies of it, and deliver them to your children’s school with a request that one copy be signed by the Principal and returned to you.

Parents’ Directive regarding education of their children
BCPTL has frequently drawn attention to the necessity of parents taking steps to protect their children in the schools, given the attempts to propagate harmful propaganda in the school system. British Columbia Parents and Teachers for Life is offering what we think may be of some help: a Parents’ Directive regarding the education of their children, a document which parents can deliver to the school, making clear their wishes with regards to the education of their children.

We think that this document is written in respectful terms yet is firm in stating the parents’ wishes. We do not take credit for the idea. Others have written similar documents. We present this as reflective of issues we feel parents should be concerned about, and hopefully reflective of the tone which such a document should have.

This document, when sent to the school, does not come from British Columbia Parents and Teachers for Life. It is only of value if it is recognized as coming from the parents who deliver it. Parents are responsible for the document when they use it. British Columbia Parents and Teachers for Life cannot be responsible for its use, and our name should not be attached to it when it is sent as a parental directive.

Should you as a parent wish to change the document in any way, you are entitled to do so. You may have other concerns which you wish to express, or you may wish to change it in some other way to suit your family’s situation. Of course, we are not responsible for any changes made. It would be well, in our view, to ensure that any changes retain a respectful tone and are carefully checked for wording before the document is delivered to your children’s school. The text of our suggested directive is given below and also on the “Help for Parents” page of this website (www.bcptl.org).
Parents’ Directive regarding education of their children
To the administrative authorities of _______________________ School in??_______________ in the province of British Columbia, regarding our children, namely:
______________________________________?__ _____________________________________
________________________________________ _____________________________________
We, the undersigned, as parents, are desirous of the welfare of our children in every aspect of their lives. We are thankful for the positive opportunities for education which are available in our country, and for teachers in our schools who generously devote their time to teaching the children and youth of our nation.
Conscious that parents are the first educators of their children and that they continue to bear a prime responsibility for their education, we are communicating the following statement of wishes regarding our children’s education. We request that this statement be kept on file in the school to which we have entrusted our children, and that it be brought to the attention of all those teachers and other staff members who will be charged with dealing with our children. We respectfully issue this statement as a legal directive to school authorities and personnel.

Holding certain principles regarding the family as the basis for our own teaching of our child or children, we desire that those principles should in no way be undermined.

We hold as an ideal the concept of the family as founded on the life-long commitment of one man and one woman to one another in marriage, and on their commitment to the welfare of their children. Nothing taught to our children in the school should undermine respect for this principle.

The school should seek the welfare of all children entrusted to it, and to the best of its ability protect all from harassment; but it shall in no way teach our children that concepts of the family diverging from our ideal are equal or superior to that ideal.

We hold to the belief that human life is sacred from conception to natural death, and nothing taught to our child or children in the school should undermine respect for this principle.
We, as parents, have signed two copies of this document as an indication of our wishes. We request that you return one copy with the signature of the school principal, as an indication of his or her having received the document. We further request that any principal succeeding the present one shall likewise sign this document.

Dated and signed this _________ day of _______________, in the year ___________ at??_________________________ in the province of British Columbia.

ALERT! Parents urged to pull kids to protest BCTF’s ‘Day of Silence’ & ‘Anti-homophobia Week’

 Comments Off on ALERT! Parents urged to pull kids to protest BCTF’s ‘Day of Silence’ & ‘Anti-homophobia Week’
Mar 052011
 

A British Columbia group has urged parents to take their children out of school to protest “indoctrination” of students by the BC Teachers’ Federation (BCTF).

At the heart of the issue are BCTF’s support of the pro-homosexual “Day of Silence” April 15, and “Week Against Homophobia” May 17-21.

But Parents for Democracy in Education did not just urge parents to pull their children during those events; the PDES “Parents’ Alert” issued March 4 stated: “The very best action for concerned parents is to pull their children completely out of the tax-funded indoctrination centres that are wrongly called ‘schools’.”

PDES urged parents instead to consider home-schooling, which the group says produces better results both academically, and in terms of socialization and transmission of the culture from one generation to the next.

Two years ago, PDES sent a reporter to cover a BCTF “conference” in Abbotsford instructing teachers how to incorporate BC’s infamous Corren Settlement Agreement. The report stated that one conference speaker, Fraser Valley University professor Martha Dow, repeatedly called Christians “the enemy”; and reproduced a BCTF handout that indicated the teachers’ union goal to manipulate student attitudes towards homosexuality from “revulsion” to “celebration” Although PDES distributed the news report on that conference widely, none of the “downstream media” carried the information to the public.

The BCTF’s “Code of Ethics” specifically states that the classroom must not be used to indoctrinate students, and PDES says the teachers’ union has violated that code by promoting acceptance of homosexuality.

RKR staffer’s say “you must” check-out the poster being utilized in this campaign of indoctrination! click here Pass this info to your family and friends!!

RKR & BC First examine the flawed selection of BC’s new Premier-designate

 Comments Off on RKR & BC First examine the flawed selection of BC’s new Premier-designate
Mar 052011
 

On the heels of the squeaker elevation of broadcaster-politician-soccer Mom Christy Cark to be BC’s next Premier, RoadKill Radio has exposed several serious flaws in the process of that election. On RKR’s March 1 broadcast, BC First leader Chris Delaney joined Kari Simpson and Terry O’Neill in studio to inform listeners and viewers of the two major concerns:

1—Foreign influence in BC politics
Vancouver researcher Vivian Krause, by studying documents filed in the USA, found that The Tides Foundation, an arm of billionaire Leftist financier George Soros’ political network, through the Seattle-based Wilberforce Foundation, may have been behind money poured into the coffers of “Organizing for Change”, a BC-based group of environmental extremists devoted to stopping tanker traffic on the BC coast.

RoadKill Radio researchers found that $20,000 was donated to the campaign of Premier-designate Christy Clark by sometime lobbyist and former Liberal campaign chairman Patrick Kinsella, who was involved in the sale of BC Rail to CNR—acting, at various times, for both the buyer and the seller.

Mr. Kinsella’s Vancouver-based political counsel firm, Progressive Strategies, has the same name as an American Political Action Consulting firm, named: Progressive Strategies. Progressive Strategies, U.S., has a posted this website motto: Fully-Intergrated Issue Campaigns With a Political Punch, and boosts radical Leftist clients like ACORN, PAW (People for the American Way), Pro-Choice America and Planned Parenthood.

The Kinsella firm gave $54,000+ to the BC Liberals between 2005 and 2009. Its American namesake publishes a PowerPoint presentation and booklets on its web-site, telling Leftist politicians how to use fake “family values” and seemingly “conservative” economic talking points to lure voters to their anti-family policies.

BC Firstparty leader Chris Delaney has asked Elections BC to investigate the money trail of foreign funding of the selection of a new BC Premier.

On RoadKill Radio, Mr. Delaney told Kari Simpson and Terry O’Neill: “A group out of the United States called The Tides Foundation USA—a big umbrella organization—billions of dollars—that people like George Soros, the Rockefellers, Bill Gates and others… use to engineer… and influence elections in other jurisdictions…

“All of a sudden policy is being driven by people outside the province… we (BC First) reported the story to Elections BC and asked what could be done…

“The Chief Electoral Officer… responded to me this morning on the third go-round: ‘Elections BC has no jurisdiction to interfere or to be involved in how a political party conducts its leadership contest’… short of breaking the actual law, they don’t get involved…

“In terms of financing a political candidate for office or a political party, again, Elections BC has very little to say… a foreign jurisdiction can donate money, can be involved… it has to be reported as an election expense…

“But in this case, what [Soros’] Tides [Foundation] did was, they gave the money to the Wilberforce Foundation (of Seattle), which gave money to Organizing for Change in BC; what they did was, they sent out letters to 28,000 [people in BC] mostly activists from the Left—environmental activists—to join the Party… to stop tanker traffic off the coast of BC…

“Chief Electoral Officer said that if there is a discrepancy after the reports are filed, they would act on that…

“This group—Organizing for Change—did not do what they did on behalf of the Liberal Party; they did it on behalf of themselves. They said, ‘You guys go out and join this Party so you can elect a Premier who will stop tanker traffic (because that’s their issue) off the coast of British Columbia.’

“They’re completely legally entitled to do that; but I think that’s wrong. I don’t care what the issue is—the issue doesn’t matter; the issue aside, no foreign group with foreign money should be allowed to agitate and to influence an election in British Columbia—especially one, although you may call it an internal election, you’re electing a party leader; but you’re actually electing the Premier of British Columbia; that’s a huge hole in the law and it needs to be fixed.”

2—Confusion in the Liberal Party’s voting procedure
There was also reason for serious concern about the “disaster” of the voting procedure: confusion surrounded the Personal Identification Numbers (PINs) issued by the Liberal Party to allow members to vote on-line. RoadKill Radio learned that a caller to a Vancouver talk show said he got a PIN—but had never been a member of the Liberal Party!

Mr. Delaney pointed out another serious concern: thousands of Liberal Party Members did not get their PINs until the day before the vote; and there could be many who did not get their PIN at all.

“The Liberal Party claims they signed up another 60,000 new members for a total of 90,000,” said Mr. Delaney.

[Researcher Vivian Krause notes that the Liberal Party had 30,000 members in BC before the campaign started; the Wilberforce Foundation in Seattle had nearly 70,000 members. When the campaign ended, the BC Liberal Party had nearly 100,000 members—a suspicious co-incidence.]

“They had 61.8 percent of the people actually vote in the election,” said Mr. Delaney. “Christy Clark won the premiership, or the leadership of her party, by 380 votes total; but 30,000 people didn’t vote!

“Now, that’s very different than a general election, where a lot of people just don’t care to vote; when you sign up for a political party, it’s so you can vote. When one-third of the people who are members of your party—who signed up to vote—don’t vote, there’s a problem!…

“Most of the people—a huge number: tens of thousands—did not get their PIN until Friday… Thousands of those people might have been out of town… What that means is that many people didn’t get to vote. If everyone had voted, that might not have been the person chosen. It was a disaster!”

Kari Simpson asked, “Is the Liberal Party doing anything about it? Is there an investigation? Is Kevin Falcon saying, ‘Wait a minute—let’s re-evaluate this, or have a second look.’?”
Chris Delany replied: “They’re all holding hands under the rainbow.”
click here to listen/download the RKR archived show

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

 Newer Entries