Ron Gray debuts his new show, Family Freedom Fighters, with guest Mary Pichette, Executive Director of Servants Anonymous Society in Surrey, BC. The SAS Surrey program has a successful 10-year record of rescuing hundreds of women from homelessness and sex slavery.
Mark Hasiuk interviews Liberal-turned-Conservative Rick Peterson, who is running in Vancouver-Quilchena, about the issues facing BC today. Are Christy Clark’s Liberals finally done for? This is a lively and informative interview!! Big issues, important information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Culture Guard News Release
For Immediate Release
March 14, 2012
VPD Investigation into
Out In Schools is a FARCE!
Kari Simpson, President of Culture Guard, has finally received the information she requested from the VPD concerning the “complaint” she never made but somehow was “investigated” about the controversial Out In Schools program. This program is operated by the same organization that is responsible for the Queer Film Festival and the publishing of a film involving obscene sexual acts that may have contravened the Criminal Code, which was detailed in her unfiled complaint.
Simpson states: “The problem is that the ‘complaint’ investigated by the VPD wasn’t the one I made. It was a complaint made from ‘memory’ according to Constable Eric Lott, as he refused to take notes during our meeting and later acknowledged he didn’t have the proper training to deal with the issues involved in the complaint. To make matters worse, Constable Lott admits in his report that he relied on ‘Google’ to fill in the blanks. The investigation is a provable farce. The VPD lied when media relations officer, Constable Lindsay Houghton, stated to a media outlet that ‘Kari Simpson made the complaint’ that was supposedly investigated.”
The original, unfiled complaint asked for the investigation of fraud on the part of Out In Schools, which used documented lies to sell itself to several BC school boards and corporate sponsors. The VPD never investigated this allegation or others made by Simpson according to the information received.
Also contained in the information provided to Mrs. Simpson were copies of internal emails sent among VPD members. One disturbing email, sent to an unidentified individual and copied to VPD members, was from VPD Inspector Mario Giardini. In his email, he forwards a copy of the December 7, 2011 Culture Guard News Release, “Complaint? What Complaint?” to an unidentified addressee and asserts as fact that the release contains “a number of errors” and then directs this individual to rally “the community” to send a “strong message.”
Kari Simpson has sent a strongly worded letter to VPD Inspector Giardini demanding that he identify the so-called “errors” contained in the Culture Guard release. “Failure to do so constitutes a serious libel,” states Simpson. (Copy of the letter follows this release.)
Further, Simpson has requested Inspector Giardini identify this mysterious “community.”
Perhaps most disturbing about Giardini’s email is the directive that this “community” send a “strong message.” Simpson states: “As someone who has received death threats and has been assaulted by militant sex activists, this is a serious and troubling situation when someone, who is duty bound to protect, deliberately incites an attack against an individual. Needless to say I will be demanding a full and independent investigation into the conducts of the VPD.”
Culture Guard has produced a 3 part exposé about the troubling information received from Kari Simpson’s FOI request about the so called “complaint” and the farce of an investigation that ensued. “Incompetency or Cover-up, you decide,” says Simpson. Part 1 webcasts tonight on RoadKill Radio.com at 7:30 pm.
Contact Kari Simpson for more information:
Tel: 604 514-1614
Email: cultureguard@gmail.com
Information follows below:
Culture Guard
Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Fax: 604 514-1669
PO Box 12014 Murrayville Square, Langley, BC, Canada V3A 9J5 ~ Email CultureGuard@gmail.com ~ www.cultureguard.com
Mario Giardini
Inspector, Vancouver Police Department
2120 Cambie Street,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 4N6
VIA EMAIL: Mario.giardini@vpd.ca
VIA FACSIMILE: 778 331-4078
March 14, 2012
RE: Email disclosed in FOI request
Attention: Inspector Mario Giardini
My name is Kari Simpson, and I am president of Culture Guard—but you know this. You also, apparently, seem to possess knowledge about facts that have escaped my careful attention, and therefore I write to request that you provide me with the details to support your assertions. The assertions I refer to are contained in an email provided to me with other documents I received from the Vancouver Police Department as a result of my request under BC’s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
Your email, dated December 7, 2011, was sent to someone in the “community” whose name is blacked out. This same email is also sent/published to L. Houghton, J. McGuinness, and P. Patterson. There are several troubling statements in your short directive, about which I and my constituency would like clarification.
Your e-mail states:
From: Giardini, Mario
sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10: 17
To:<22(1)>
Cc: Houghton, Lindsey; McGuinness, Jana; Patterson, Paul
Subject: Update on Out In Schools Police Investigation! Culture Guard News Release
Good Morning:
here is the latest press release from Ms. Kari Simpson. In reading this release there are a number of errors that I noted. I have spoken to our Public Affairs members and we will not be responding to this obviously incorrect assessment.
However, please feel free to to comment on Ms. Simpson’s assertions. It would be a strong message if the community came out and disputed Ms. Simpson’s allegations.
thanks
Mario
Mario Giardini Inspector 1415
Diversity and Aboriginal Policing
Vancouver Police Department (604) 717-3161
In your email, referring to Culture Guard’s Dec. 7, 2011 news release —“Complaint? What complaint?” — you asserted as a fact that within our release “there are a number of errors…”
The copy provided to me shows no markings to identify what you assert to be “errors.” Thus you have stated in writing, to at least four people, that I have published false information. Such an assertion, if proved untrue, constitutes libel and/or defamation. Please identify for me the statements that you construe to be “errors.”
Further, I can see from your address bars that this email was also distributed to others, and it is clear that additional “Public Affairs members” were also told of these so-called “errors” and/or “incorrect assessment”; how many times did you repeat or tell people that I was publishing false information?
You then seem to give a very curious directive to a certain unidentified “community”; Inspector Giardini, please advise me of, or define, the “community” which you directed to “send a strong message” to dispute my “allegations.”
What “community” deserves such special attention that you provided them with my “latest press release”?
Is the forwarding of News Releases to mysterious members of a “community” part of your job description?
What sort of “strong message” did you want this mysterious “community” to “come out with”?
What allegations in my news release did you want them to dispute?
Did anyone to your knowledge publically “dispute” my information or is this mysterious “community” better informed than you are?
I have included with this correspondence a sampling of the hateful vitriol that I, and other law abiding citizens, have to endure for publishing the truth about sex activists within the schools here in BC. I see from your published statements in Xtra that you are “sensitive” and believe there are totally “different dynamics” at play when you deal with gay or lesbian issues. Is this why you and other members of the VPD are turning a blind eye to unlawful conduct within the homosexual community?
I have included in the sampling some of the death threats I received. Is this the type of “strong message” you are inciting the “community” to engage in?
I trust from your background research on me that you know I take very seriously factual and truthful discourse on important matters—especially matters involving parental rights and the protection of children. I hope your responses to the above questions will reflect that the VPD and its members—members like you—also take very seriously the public’s trust; and that you will alleviate any concerns that VPD members may be engaging in smear campaigns against citizens who raise legitimate concerns about parental rights and protecting minors.
I look forward to your identification of the “errors” you have alleged to be in the Dec. 7, 2011 Culture Guard News Release.
Yours sincerely,
Kari Simpson
President Culture Guard
Copied to:
Chief Constable Jim Chu
Constable Lindsay Houghton
Constable Jana McGuinness
Paul Patterson, Senoir Director, Community & Public Affairs Section
Informed Civil Canadians and their elected representatives
Examples of Hate enclosed…
Examples of HATE, Intolerance, racism and vilification –
To: Inspector Mario Giardini and others to whom it may concern –
The following examples below of hate, racism, religious intolerance and vilification published by homosexual and other sex activists arise from two related events; the factual exposé done by Culture Guard on the Out In Schools program, and the growing revolt of civil Canadians to the hijacking of the public education system by sex activists.
The publication of the examples is to educate and enlighten individuals, law enforcement agencies and members of the media to the language of hate, intimidation and threats. The examples below were used by sex activists and were targeted at individuals and groups who dared to expose the lies and tools of propaganda used by activists within the BC Teachers’ Federation and their sex activist community partners. This is a small militant group and does not reflect the broader gay community that shares in our concern about the abuse currently taking place in the public education system by the radical sex activists.
Concerning the death threats against me, the author of two of these threats is a homosexual activist and has been identified with the assistance of RoadKill Radio’s expert computer technicians and the Langley RCMP.
The information published below is offensive, racist and hateful. Typically I wouldn’t publish these hateful offensive threats and words, but the investigating body for this complaint will be the Vancouver Police Department, a provably bias organization when it comes to applying the law to the homosexual sex activist community. I will be sending the complaint directly to Chief Chu. I have already spoken to the Provincial Hate Crime Unit. I have been advised they can only act after the VPD investigates and refers the file to them, as the majority of these publications have been published by a pro-homosexual Vancouver media outlet.
Further, I believe members of the conventional media should be enlightened and educated as to the hate and vile threats espoused from the sex activist community. I appreciate the fact that editors and other members of the media are fearful of the predictable public temper tantrums of the sex activist community that ensues when factual reporting on these matters occur, but proper journalism has never been for cowards – grow-up. In some cases, editors and members of the media are just plain stupid when it comes to understanding the political agenda of government money grabs and political recruitment by the sex activist community; time to educate yourselves and quit being a “gay toady” – this is a multi-billion dollar industry. In other cases, the sex activist is a member of your news room and bullies his or her special agenda into the daily mix; time to stand up to the bully – truth often offends. And most disconcerting is the reality that news editors are failing to report news stories that truthfully depict issues involving homosexual sex activism for fear of losing advertising revenues, i.e. Pride Parade and its corporate bandwagon sponsors and their union supporters – this is shameful. Reporting the truth sometimes has a price. Integrity is priceless.
Inspector Mario Giardini, for whom I have taken the time to compile these samples, currently co-chairs the “diversity” unit of the Vancouver Police Department. As such, it seems that he often meets with and/or speaks to XTRA, one of the publications responsible for publishing many of the examples below and a sponsor of the Out In Schools program.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Kari D. Simpson
President, Culture Guard
I have removed the addresses, albeit often phoney, and identifying info from these examples. The formal complaint provided to VPD Chief Chu will have all details included. –
KARI IS STUPID, GAY, FAT ANND UGLY, SHE MUST DIE and I wouldn’t care if you died. No one would. So just do it it would make everyone WAY happier.
_____________________________________
Dear Ms. Simpson …I am a gay man…I feel threatened by your ideology. It actually makes me afraid…Is it safe for me to be who I am…These are the thoughts that briefly cross my mind.
… Then I realize you are the conduit of evil. I look forward to spitting on your tombstone you dumb cow.
_____________________________________
Someone should euthanize her
_____________________________________
I ain’t pussyfooting around anymore!
I am SO ANGRY! These bigoted pigs can display their bigotry out, loud and proudly. I am going to do the same!
09/10/11 10:29 PM EST
_____________________________________
Perhaps Chinese Parents should…
be more concerned about domestic violence in their relationships than whether or not their children are exposed to gay reverences in the schools. That way maybe there will be fewer husbands murdering their wives, putting the body in a suitcase, and dumping it in the Fraser River.
09/11/11 9:58 PM EST
_____________________________________
No fucking way Jason!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You do whatever fweels good in your heart! I have nothing but HATRED for these fucking cunts of parents. i hope they all are blessed with gay children and that they are TORTURED until the day they die about the why? as to why their stupid, fucking God made their children gay. They’ll probably blame me for this though. Stupid pigs.
09/13/11 1:02 AM EST
_____________________________________
Help take this batshit crazy homophobic cunt Kari Simpson down. Please flag the Youtube videos as well. She is violating copyright laws and using peoples photo’s and videos unauthorized amongst a million other violations. She is also potentially putting youth at risk by showing their photo’s Some of them might not be out. I’m sure this cow is also violating hate and human right laws too. Fuck you Kari Simpson!
(address removed)@yahoo.ca
_____________________________________
10/22/11
honey you talk the talk, but you cannot sugar coat hate i am surprised your eyes aren’t brown. you need to stop worrying about what gay people are doing in bed and stop being so damned judgemental. stop thinking about gay sex and destroying the self esteem of young individuals. lady you are proof that evil is alive masquerading as “christian” love. You need to pull your head out of your pompous pontificating butt and get a whiff of reality. If homosexuality was a choice lady, the likes of you make it an easy choice. I would still choose a hot man over your cold ugly heart. That stink you smell lady is your own. how many young have to take their own lives before you see the damage you cause or do you care? They should put your picture on condoms lady. More men would choose to use them if they knew people like you could have been prevented. Please go back to your sexually frustrated boring life and stop obsessing about gay sex. Honestly, you think about it more than any gay man I know. Jealous I guess that some people actually have it without shame and with God’s blessing.
_____________________________________
Yo Dave
Do not tell me how to write my fucking posts. Don’t like it? Don’t read it! I will rant and rave all I like! THESE PEOPLE MAKE ME SICK! Overhrunning our city like a fucking plague!
09/13/11 7:01 PM EST
_____________________________________
Oh god, shut up
They are pigs! Oink oink!
09/14/11 2:14 AM EST
_____________________________________
Stop Chinese Immigration Now!
What a shallow messed-up money-hungry people. What kind of a country lets itself become a Chinese colony without a shot fired?
09/08/11 5:35 AM EST
_____________________________________
This article is racist
This article is a demonstration of how bigoted the Asian community really is.
09/08/11 2:41 PM EST
_____________________________________
Sent to Culture Guard
(Address removed)
2011/09/23
Haha video killed the radio star
_____________________________________
Sent to a Christian activist on his facebook page –
…I hope you are arrested, & raped in prison.
Also I’d like to see you speak your thoughts at a gay pride parade anywhere in Vancouver, British Columbia, the crowds would watch you get your face stomped into the street.
_____________________________________
(address removed) @yahoo.ca
Maybe these (type of) Chinese parents could spend more time not raising brats that race their high-priced cars down highways risking other people’s lives and less time worrying about crushing gay rights. It’s discouraging and sad how homophobic the Chinese community is in the lower mainland. Their homophobia is not doing much good considering the number of their kids I see out at the clubs each weekend.
Sean, Vancouver BC
09/08/11 9:23 PM EST
_____________________________________
(address removed)@yahoo.ca
10/11/11
Correction. I have never met a gaybasher who was not a closeted homosexual. Come out come out, we know you’re in there.
_____________________________________
(address removed)
As a long time survivor of hiv/AIDS I find your comments insensitive. How do you feel about people who smoke, over eat, have addiction issues, infertility issues, mental health issues.? I contracted hiv before it was even identified and have heard your hate speech come out of the mouths of ignorant people like Anita Bryant to Fred Phelps. (I will assume you are on a first name basis with this guy). Yes I do expect taxpayer’s to foot the bill for any kind of illness regardless of how it was contracted.
Don’t put words in my mouth. I never called you any names rather I suggested you deal with these deep feelings of hate your harbour. It is obvious how you skipped over the seriousness of young people who hear crap like you spew, and who either risk or end up taking their own lives. I suggest you are a closeted lesbian. You obviously have some serious issues around sex, so may I suggest you seek therapy before your filthy mouth damages any more young people. I still think you are a closeted homosexual. I have not met a person who was not a gaybasher who wasn’t. What you are doing goes way beyond gaybashing, it is destroying young lives, and you take money for doing it. That is criminal.
_____________________________________
Oh Dear (Name removed)
Just like you didn’t CHOOSE to be a bigoted ASIAN fuckface, I didn’t choose to be gay. We need to reign in the immigration limits. My Canada is being turned into Hong Kong and I am becoming more and more racist EVERY SINGLE DAY becuase of it. If the Asians can be that way, they have a huge battle on their hands. I also have to wonder why “concerned parent” keeps trolling Xtra West. Hmmmmmmmmmmm…. Don’t like Canada? Go back to where you came from and get OUT of my country! You CHOSE to come here you pigs!
09/10/11 7:02 PM EST
_____________________________________
response to marc
reply to marc’s post: “I ain’t pussyfooting around anymore! I am SO ANGRY! These bigoted pigs can display their bigotry out, loud and proudly. I am going to do the same!
I TOTALLY AGREE!!!…while most gays are content to be gay…and to allow the rest of society to live as they wish to live…there are an amazing number of, as you call them “BIGOTED PIGS” who are completely intolerant of anyone outside the gay community, and refuse to allow other members of society to even express an opinion (unless it supports the gay agenda)…keep up the good fight Marc…
09/17/11 1:51 PM EST
_____________________________________
Nope Jason.
Damn them straight to hell! My bible says these bigots shall burn in hell for all eternity! It’s quite a lovely thought actually!
09/21/11 1:09 AM EST
_____________________________________
Church members and sex
It is so sad to read how some people who fear that their son or daughter will become non-heterosexual beings. Maybe they need to be educated, but I doubt that the church that they belong to will help in this matter! 🙂 I noticed that many were from China (probably wealthy Chinese from HK). Maybe they should understand that we tolerate them when they are showing off, driving their exclusive material possessions (often on borrowed money), presumably to show that they are successful (more than the losers non-Asian are?). I think they need to review their losing-face custom, which IMHO produces dysfunctional behaviours because they make me lose face every time I drive my normal car!
04/30/11 3:28 PM EST
_____________________________________
No to Hatred
Don’t these hateful parents realize that it’s a public system? The School Act ensures that all students will encounter a system that’s “strictly secular” and free of “religious dogma.” If these parents want to inculcate their own youngsters with their church’s bigoted, grandiose religious delusions, then they must do so privately and at their own expense. The Board has a duty to provide gay students and staff with a safe, hatred-free learning environment: thus, these families should be encouraged to enrol their children elsewhere.
05/01/11 4:16 AM EST
_____________________________________
Sorry Jack
I was there, the crowd was indeed mostly Asian. It is an observance and not racist at all. Nobody said those dirty, stinky and bigoted Asians were out in full force, did they? Nope, merely an observance. There were a FEW Caucasians there too. Try to learn the difference Jack.
05/03/11 8:17 PM EST
_____________________________________
Doesn’t change
the FACT that most of the attendees were bigoted ASIANS!!!!!!!! Asian.Asian.Asian.Asian.Asian. If the room had been full of bigoted black people, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO TOO.
05/04/11 9:25 PM EST
_____________________________________
Hmmm…
fucking pigs!
05/11/11 8:11 PM EST
_____________________________________
/\ Hate from above /\
“Homosexuality however is clearly documented to be dangerous” To quote the above parent from Burnaby, BC. May your son grow up to be a Drag Queen you evil SOB.
05/16/11 1:26 PM EST
_____________________________________
Say goodbye
To your businesses Asian pricks, you will be run out of town. We will protest your stay in Canada and your fucking corner shops. Goodbye!
06/26/11 8:33 PM EST
_____________________________________
Miss (name removed)
GO FUCK YOURSELF!
06/20/11 3:38 PM EST
_____________________________________
Civility?
screw her! She’s a cunt!
06/22/11 12:04 AM EST
_____________________________________
MY MISSION!
I am going to find out how many of these parents have businesses, ie: Asians owning corner shops and I am going to make a list and post it everywhere, for everyone to see, and let’s hope that the boycotting backlash or picketing of their livelehood might make THEM realize how good they had it as IMMIGRANTS to our fabulous country pre-boycott. PREPARE yourselves you pricks, your time is soon coming to an end. I WILL have your businesses and livelyhoods RUN INTO THE GROUND! Have a great day. Michael.
06/26/11 8:31 PM EST
_____________________________________
Lifesite, Tom?
A link to the vatican’s website, like I give a fuck what that pack of pedophile-enablers thinks? You Catholics really need to get your heads out of your asses & take a long, hard (haha) look at the criminal organization your are part of and support financially every time the collection plate passes you by.
Carlos the Jackal, Vancouver BC
06/29/11 5:29 PM EST
Recently, I heard Vancouver School Board Chair Patti Bacchus on CKNW’s Simi Sara Show, pleading for money. “We have one of the best education systems in the world, but it’s under-funded,” she whined.
But is it really “one of the best education systems in the world”? I don’t think so.
Oh, it does a few things pretty well; in mathematics, for example, standards are above-average. But an inordinate amount of classroom time is wasted—no, worse than wasted: corrupted—by allowing sex activists and radical Leftists to indoctrinate their captives.
In fact, the reason this situation came about has a lot to do with the crappy state of education in BC since the 1960s. Some of the graduates of those days—matriculants of the collapsing education system immortalized by Professor Alan Bloom in his book The Closing of the American Mind—were elected to public office in the 1980s. When they re-wrote the BC School Act, they included a statement that “public education must be secular.”
The problem was that they didn’t understand the difference between “non-sectarian” and “secular”.
“Non-sectarian”—the phrase they should have used—means public education must not indoctrinate captive students in denominational dogma.
But “secular” actually requires the public schools to indoctrinate students in Secularist dogma. You see, Secularism is not religiously neutral; it is a religion—a world-view. In fact, Secularism is the most bigoted religion of all. Its goal is the extirpation of all other faiths.
The result of that 30-year-old malapropism is that our young people today are having the moral dimensions of life scrubbed out of their consciousness, as though it were something unclean. The very moral code that made Canada one of the most desirable places on earth to live is being purposefully eradicated, because our public education system—far from being the model that the self-laudatory Patti Bachhus claims—is a moral disaster, in which captive students are indoctrinated into morally corrupt ideologies.
Here’s an important question: if teachers are willing to lie to the taxpayers who employ them, are they also willing to lie to the students?
A recent ad by the BC Teachers’ Federation—the teachers’ radical, pro-gay Leftist union—features a purported teacher pleading: “What we’re asking for is what students need.”
Really? Let’s have a look at some of the things they’re asking for:
• “Compassionate leave” for teachers when a friend dies. How does that benefit students? Cost to taxpayers: $80 million.
• A 22% pay raise at a time when governments are fighting deficits and debts that the students will have to repay in higher taxes when they graduate—if they can find a job in the socialist-crippled economy they’ll inherit. Benefit to teachers: a top pay rate that jumps from $74,353 to $90,944 a year . Cost: $618 million.
• Up to 26 weeks of fully paid leave per year to provide direct or indirect compassionate care to any person. Cost to taxpayers: $49 million a year.
• Eight days off a year whenever a teacher wants. $122 million a year.
• Topping up parental and maternity leave to allow up to 5 years of leave per child. Cost to taxpayers: $41 million a year.
• Five more days off for professional development, at teacher’s discretion: $80 million.
• Up to five days off a year to care for their child—or any other person: $80 million.
• Unlimited leave for union business. Who knows what that will cost?
• Benefit upgrades—taxpayers will pick up the full tab for MSP, extended health and dental, applying to all teachers: $82 million.
• taxpayer pays all professional fees: about $5 million a year.
• Improvements to On Call pay, including $2,200 per month whether they work or not. Cost to taxpayers: $60 million.
• Retirement bonus of 5% a year to any teacher with 10 years or more service at age 55. Total cost to taxpayers: $445 million.
The $2.184 billion price tag is actually only part of what BCTF demands would cost. Many other provincial government bargaining agreements have a “me-too” clause: if BC breaks its net-zero wage mandate, every other union will be able to use that “whipsaw” to renegotiate their contract to try for more.
And don’t buy the argument that BC teachers are underpaid compared to other provinces. Look at the facts:
The BCTF claim of “tumbling from third place to eighth” is inaccurate and misleading, because those place rankings were arrived at using two differing methods.
An accurate description of BC teachers’ salaries from 2006 to 2011, according to the Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation:
• By one set of criteria, BC teachers ranked 3rd in Canada in 2006, and now rank 4th;
• By the other set of criteria, in 2006, BC teachers’ salaries ranked 6th in Canada, and in 2011 were 7th.
“But it’s for the children,” pleads the BCTF ad.
I think it’s a crock…
NEWS RELEASE from Culture Guard
Feb. 27, 2012
For immediate release
Citizens’ rights advocate threatens education ministry with human rights case over ‘slurs’
VICTORIA, Feb. 27, 2012 (CultureGuard) — A citizens’ rights advocacy group, Culture Guard, has asked Education Minister George Abbott to ban words it says demean and incite hatred against students, parents and other stakeholders who oppose having the homosexual political agenda propagandized in schools.
The offensive words include “homophobia”, “homophobe”, “homophobic” and “heterosexist”.
“The words are just made-up propaganda words,” says Culture Guard president Kari Simpson. “They may sound pseudo-medical or pseudo-psychological, but they aren’t found in any recognized medical, psychological or psychiatric dictionaries.
“Their only purpose is propaganda: once the sex activists hang a hateful label on parents or others who don’t want children brainwashed in school, they can more easily persuade the public, the media, and politicians not to listen to fact-based arguments for protecting students from political propaganda.”
In a letter to Abbott, Mrs. Simpson cites the up-coming “Pink Shirt Day”, which will be observed in many BC schools, as an ideal time for the minister to ban the use of such “bully” words in official documents and programs.
“Failure to stand against this anti-democratic strategy, which denies civil Canadians rights that are explicitly protected within the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, will result in a complaint to the BC Human Rights Tribunal,” her letter states.
Simpson notes that many homosexual practices are provable vectors for diseases which are at epidemic proportions among homosexuals, and which cost the public billions of dollars—but are “100% preventable” by behaviour change.
Under the guise of “anti-bullying”, sex activist campaigns seek to “celebrate” in schools (quoting a recent BCTF graphic, handed out at a conference where teachers were coached on how to implement the “teachers’ guide” Making Space)
One example cited was a report published by a provincially-funded community health organization that serve Vancouver’s homosexual community, which stated that throat cancer caused by sexual practices common among homosexual men is now a greater threat than lung cancer from smoking.
Another web-site funded by the government gives kids “how-to” information on “fisting”—a physically dangerous practice common among homosexuals. And her letter stated that a pro-gay, Drag Queen sex activist who “sponsors” a northern BC school’s “Gay-Straight Alliance” club gave the same kind of information to students.
=30=
contact: Kari Simpson
phone: (694) 514-1614
e-mail: RKRNews@gmail.com
Correspondence to the Hon. George Abbott follows.
Culture Guard
Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Fax: 604 514-1669
The Hon. George Abbott
Minister of Education
Room 310
Parliament Buildings
Victoria, BC V8V 1X4
VIA FACSIMILE: 250 387-3200
February 27, 2012
Re: Eradication of the Slurs: Homophobe, Homophobia, Homophobic, Heterosexism, Heterosexist
Attention Mr. Minister:
The opportunity is before us to make “Pink Shirt Day” truly meaningful—to convince students to end the use of all slurs, including hateful, harmful, and demeaning “bully” words like “homophobe”, “homophobia”, “homophobic” and “heterosexist”—which are all invented propaganda words. Although they sound pseudo-medical and pseudo-psychological, they are not to be found in any recognized medical, psychological or psychiatric dictionaries.
As you are aware, words like these are verbal weapons, used by some radical teachers and sex activists against students or their parents (and others) who hold constitutionally-protected views and opinions about homosexuality, sexual promiscuity and other defined or yet-to-be-defined sexual identities. These words are typically used by sex activists to demean and promote contempt for those who seek to have a mature, informed and long-overdue discussion about the growing and costly implications—to both our health-care and to our social services—associated with homosexuality and sexual promiscuity.
It is long past time to eradicate the use of such contemptuous labels. And when official documents and/or statements make use of them, it gives official sanction to a fascist strategy of co-opting authority to silence dissenting opinions.
Failure to stand against this anti-democratic strategy, which denies civil Canadians rights that are explicitly protected within the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, will result in a complaint to the BC Human Rights Tribunal.
I trust you are aware of the growing and troubling numbers, among those 25 years of age and under, relating to transmission and proliferation of sexually-transmitted diseases. As Education Minister, you have a duty to inform students, for their protection, about the serious implications and costs to health and social services that are a direct result of dangerous and unhealthy sexual practices. I, like most Canadians, support the right of others to engage in relationships of their choosing; but the factual reality is that some of these practices are now costing me, and other Canadians, billions upon billions of dollars in health-care and other related costs. This is where it becomes my business, and that of other Canadians, to start questioning the irresponsible behaviours of individuals that are over-burdening our social services. It is also where I and other Canadians, including our elected representatives, must look critically at the purveyors of false and/or misleading information, and how this propaganda is spreading through our civil society and contributing to goals contrary to those mandated by the School Act, specifically:
WHEREAS it is the goal of a democratic society to ensure that all its members receive an education that enables them to become literate, personally fulfilled and publicly useful, thereby increasing the strength and contributions to the health and stability of that society;
AND WHEREAS the purpose of the British Columbia school system is to enable all learners to become literate, to develop their individual potential and to acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to contribute to a healthy, democratic and pluralistic society and a prosperous and sustainable economy;
. [Emphases mine]
I was recently engaged in an exchange of correspondence with a man who has contracted AIDS. This individual’s sexual practices included sodomy. I trust you are aware, as BC’s Education Minister, that in Canada, the category of men having sex with men (“MSM”) is vastly over-represented in the new infection statistics from the Centres for Disease Control. MSM is, in fact, the primary vector in North America for a number of costly sexually transmitted diseases.
This individual, in addition to all the medical costs to tax-payers related to his treatment, is also collecting two government pensions, including a federal disability pension. He is also receiving a government subsidy for housing because of his 100% preventable disease. He likes to live comfortably, so one of his recent accommodations costs $1,800.00 per month. He shares this with his “buddy”—another man collecting the same pensions, due to his own AIDS status. He also advised me that he expects hard-working Canadians to pay for “all his expenses.”
I trust that, as Education Minister, you are aware that among the homosexual male population, throat cancer caused by common practices among that group is now more likely than cancer caused by smoking! Here is one warning that a provincially-funded community health organization called Health Initiative for Men, which, in addition to creating hard-core homosexual porn with tax-payers’ money, also provides health advice to homosexual men, the caution states:
The ‘good thing’ in this case being oral sex. Yes boys, a new research finding has officially stated that giving too much head is more likely to cause throat cancer than smoking! Stating the obvious; we love giving our partner’s penis and ass some loving, perhaps more so than our straight counterparts, and with more ‘partners’ at that. This means then that the gay population is at higher risk of getting throat cancer, especially when you consider the fact that the more people you perform oral sex on, the greater the odds of you contracting an oral infection which leads to the cancer.
Then we have the provincially funded youth resource “Planet Ahead” which, aided by “Luci Lubricant” and “Condom man”, is invited into schools to alter/form the “values” of 12-15 year olds. Like government-funded Planned Parenthood (which changed its name to Options for Sexual Health after the link between Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, and Adolf Hitler was exposed, along with her racist advocacy of “eliminating weeds from the human garden”), these groups promote to students the liberty to freely “express themselves” in any sexual manner they wish.
“Won’t get Weird”, a youth-oriented web-site funded in part by we tax-payers, and operated by Options for Sexual Health/Planned Parenthood, gives kids “important” information, such as “giving blow jobs with braces on”, while making mock of parents.
Another government funded site called “Spiderbytes” gives information to teenagers on “fisting”—how-to, etc. This information on fisting parallels information given to a Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) club at a public school in northern BC by its “drag queen” sponsor.
One alarming aspect of all this sex talk is that the reality of the financial costs and health hazards associated with irresponsible and unnatural sexual conduct and/or behaviours is utterly absent from the discussion—and there is no opportunity for debate. It’s all one-sided propaganda… and lies.
Respected BC Court of Appeal judge, Justice Mary Southin, addressing the issues of promoting homosexuality in the public education system, wrote:
When there is a sea-change in the accepted wisdom of a society, those who have adhered to the attitudes of the past, what I call the “old wisdom”, in a very short space of time may find themselves denigrated by adherents of the “new wisdom”.
The slurs used by adherents of the so-called “new wisdom” have been shown to be factually foolish; what is more, they wilfully endanger the health and well-being of our children and youth. Further, the monetary costs to our society by “celebrating” medically unsafe sexual practices are prohibitive.
Defaming and denigrating those whose wisdom and insight has stood the test of time—and continues, provably, to do so—must not be tolerated. As Minister of Education, you will also be culpable for promoting hate and contempt, if you tolerate your subordinates embedding the language of hate within Ministry of Education statements and policies. These slurs of hostility and belittlement, designed to silence anyone who would dare to initiate pertinent, fact-based discussion of important and serious matters relating to sexual practices, must cease.
Here is one of many ironic examples: in the Ministry of Education’s Safe Caring and Orderly Schools directive, schools are required to incorporate a number of policies and practices designed to “protect” all students—i.e., to teach, model and encourage socially responsible behaviours that contribute to the school community, solve problems in peaceful ways, value diversity, defend human rights, and assume responsibility, in partnership with the wider community, for resolving critical safety concerns.
This looks like a good directive—until one reads on and sees that your Ministry believes it is OK to single out those who—for religious, cultural, moral, medical and other common-sense motives—want to challenge the propaganda being published within the schools by politically-driven sex-activist teachers. And here’s where your Ministry starts to use demeaning slurs:
…work together to better understand issues such as bullying,
harassment and intimidation, racism, sexism and
homophobia…
Linking this invented propaganda/slur to “harassment” and “racism” is a further insult to people whose opposition to homosexual propaganda in the schools is based upon valid medical and economic criteria, and has nothing whatsoever to do with “hate”.
You exacerbate the problem by asserting—as factual—propaganda published by self-identified homosexual and political groups like GALE (now known as Pride Education Network), and by allowing its use as “appropriate resources”. Resources like Challenging Homophobia are political, and incorporate hateful words and slurs designed to bully, demean and silence fact-based opposition to their writers’ political agendas.
Because these materials are so clearly political—in some cases acknowledged as such by their authoring groups—they have absolutely no place within our schools!
I have been appalled at the many examples I now have seen that demonstrate the cultivation of hate within our schools; newly-recruited homosexual “allies” use despicable bullying tactics to target youth, parents and other stakeholders who might dare to demand a factual and truthful account of important issues relating to homosexuality and other aberrant and unsafe sexual practices.
I recently confronted the Chair of the Vancouver School Board with these facts, after witnessing the hatred and contempt demonstrated by some students who made presentations under the guise of “questions” to the Board at two recent meetings. I am delighted to report that Ms. Bacchus subsequently refrained from using the slurs referred to herein, at the next VSB meeting. I have, for your convenience, enclosed a copy of my recent correspondence to Ms. Bacchus.
With the controversial “Pink Shirt Day” fast approaching— controversial because its original agenda of opposing all bullying has been hi-jacked by homosexual activists and the BCTF—I fervently hope you will embrace the true spirit of that day by refraining from using any slurs. Further, I request that you write to me forthwith, affirming your willingness to:
1) Eradicate from the Ministry of Education’s policies and/or directives any use of the slurs referred to herein;
2) Write to all Boards of Education, instructing them to prohibit the use of the said slurs in any policy or program.
I hope this matter can be resolved quickly, as failure to do so will certainly result in a complaint to the BC Human Rights Tribunal. I believe the documented evidence will be overwhelming as to the degree of hatred and contempt being fostered in our schools by allowing these slurs to be treated as “acceptable”. They are not.
I trust that you will act quickly to resolve this troubling situation. I remain in my willingness to meet with you and brief you on the issues related to the BCTF and the political agenda of sex activists within BC schools.
Yours truly,
Kari D. Simpson
President, Culture Guard
Tel: 604 514-1614
Email: cultureguard@gmail.com
Enclosed Patti Bacchus letter follows.
Culture Guard
Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Email: cultureguard@gmail.com
Ms. Patti Bacchus
Chairwoman, VSB
1580 West Broadway
Vancouver, BC V6J 5K8
Via Email
February 7, 2012
Re: Hateful & Contemptuous Slurs
Attention Ms. Bacchus:
As you are aware, I attended the last meeting of the Vancouver School Board on January 16, 2012. The meeting was also attended by a number of concerned parents, students and several homosexual activists and homosexual activist teachers: teachers who belong to overtly political groups like Pride Net.
I was disappointed and offended to see you allow hateful and contemptuous slurs being used that night: slurs made by trustees, teachers, students and PAC representatives. The terms “homophobe”, “homophobic” and “homophobia” are well-known hateful words, typically rooted in bigotry or ignorance and used to target, demean and bully into silence and compliance individuals and/or groups opposed to the public dissemination of false and propagandist information related to homosexuality and other allegedly “fluid” sexual determinations.
These same slurs are standard verbal weapons used by sex activists against individuals and/or groups that oppose the “celebration” of medically unsafe sexual practices like sodomy, and other associated sexual practices that are physically harmful and cost individuals their lives and their health—and which heavily burden our tax-funded healthcare system and other social services with obscene costs that are, for the most part, 100% preventable.
The groups targeted by the sex activists include members of the various faith communities (whose beliefs are protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms); medical and mental health professionals; politicians; and informed Canadians—all of whom are increasingly appalled at both the misinformation being disseminated by their public education system, and by the abuse of their tax dollars by individuals who engage in risky and unhealthy sexual practices, and then expect the next generation to pay for the medical and societal expenses associated with the consequences of their sexual behaviour.
As a trustee, Ms. Bacchus, you are duty-bound— by your own policies, and by law—to ensure that an environment without discrimination is cultivated within the Vancouver School District. Your lack of leadership and willful acquiesce to the bully tactics that played out that evening were nothing short of disgraceful; and perhaps only trumped by the ignorance displayed by students who spoke — students who proved only that the VSB has been providing platforms for sex activists who are demonstrably ignorant about issues involving homosexuality; but are well-trained in parroting the talking points and slurs used relentlessly by homosexual and other sex activists. Hardly something to take “pride” in.
I trust tonight’s meeting will be conducted in a more respectful and lawful manner. I believe it would be prudent for you to ensure that hateful slurs like “homophobe”, “homophobic” “homophobia” and “heterosexist” are prohibited. These words create a false impression of medical or psychological authority—but they do not appear in any recognized medical or psychological dictionaries. They are merely propaganda labels used to dismiss legitimate arguments used by opponents of the “gay agenda”. I am requesting that at the outset of tonight’s meeting, you openly declare those terms, and other similar words, to be inappropriate; and that you apologize to those in attendance for having allowed such vile and contemptuous slurs during the last meeting.
Be further advised that I have also asked the Vancouver Police to attend, to protect concerned parents who will be there. At the last VSB meeting, a videographer for Culture Guard was assaulted by one of the pro-sex activists. Your participation, by allowing nonsensical, divisive tactics like the politically-driven censure of Trustees Woo and Denike, fuelled some of the sex activists’ penchant for violence. I trust you will ensure that individuals videotaping the aggressive conduct of sex activist teachers, trustees and VSB facilitators will not have to endure further physical assault. I also trust that you will not give preferential treatment to sex activist teachers like Ms. Dumont, a member of the sex activist political organization Pride Education Network, as you did at the last public meeting. Ms. Dumont’s request not to be video-recorded at a public meeting is at best silly; she is featured on the PrideNet website, picture and all.
I remain in my willingness to meet with you and brief you on matters related to the Out In Schools program and other propaganda like Gender Spectrum—another pile of propagandist nonsense put out by the BCTF.
It is obvious from the last meeting that you and a few of the other trustees appear to be ignorant of the facts relating to the Out In Schools program. This is most troubling, as you refused my request to appear before the Board at the last meeting—an appearance that would have informed you about the Out In Schools program. Are you afraid of the facts? Do you fear public condemnation when parents find out about a program that you endorse, but claim to be ignorant of? Yes, I have the video from the last meeting which confirms both these statements.
In closing, Ms. Bacchus, be advised that I will accept your invitation to meet if you have the leadership skills and courage to extend one. I will do this, I admit, not because I have any measure of respect for you—quite the contrary—but because the students involved deserve to have their best interests protected, and their parents deserve to know the truth.
Yours truly,
Kari Simpson
President, Culture Guard
Copies –
VSB Trustees
VSB Superintendent
VSB Secretary Treasurer
Media
Informed Canadians
CultureGuard
Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Fax: 604 514-1669
News release
February 15, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Culture Guard files formal complaint
to VSB about Out In Schools program
VANCOUVER, Feb. 15, 2012 (Culture Guard) — Kari Simpson, president of Culture Guard, filed a formal complaint this morning with the Vancouver Board of School on behalf of concerned Vancouver parents, after VSB Chair Patti Bacchus claimed at the last public Board meeting to have “no knowledge” of complaints about the Board-endorsed “Out In Schools” program.
Mrs. Simpson said she wasn’t surprised by Ms. Bacchus’s claims of ignorance: “Ms. Bacchus admitted, at that meeting, to endorsing the notorious Out In Schools program without knowing anything about it.”
Kari Simpson further states: “It appears that Ms. Bacchus is comfortable operating in a vacuum—devoid of knowing what is really transpiring in the classrooms of the Vancouver School District. Clearly, she has abdicated her duty to be the guardian of the public’s trust, and has placed the health and well-being of students in harm’s way.”
The filed complaint states: “The Vancouver Board of School Trustees (VSB), by endorsing the OIS program and allowing it to be advertised, published and taught in the classrooms and/or other facilities of the Vancouver Public School District, is complicit in distributing false, dangerous and misleading information to students and parents—thus endangering the health and well-being of children, and breaching the public’s trust.”
The complaint then identifies many of the more obvious failings of the program, including the goal of encouraging students to call people names by using hateful terms like “homophobe”.
Simpson goes on to say that parents will be horrified when they find out who is “sponsoring” this program in Vancouver schools. These sponsors include a “queer” sex festival and XTRA!—a division of a so-called “not-for-profit” publishing company called Pink Triangle Press, that operates (among other lucrative ventures) a casual homosexual “hook-up” site called “Squirt”.
The Out In Schools program has been able to operate under the public radar by claiming to be an “anti-bullying” program. Thus misrepresenting the goals of the program, it also made false claims that the resource had been sent to the Ministry of Education for approval, this assertion has been proved to be a lie. The VSB and the sponsoring teachers have also failed to inform parents that sex activists like Jen “Jenderf**k” Sung were “educating” their children.
The complaint sent to the Vancouver Board of School Trustees follows this release.
For more information on OIS, watch the two-part video presentations, updates, and a letter that remains unanswered by Ross Johnstone, OIS program director; all are available at www.cultureguard.com Warning: the videos contain graphic content not suitable for minors.
=30=
Contact: Kari Simpson
telephone: 604 514-1614
e-mail: cultureguard@gmail.com
CultureGuard
Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Fax: 604 514-1669
Vancouver Board of School Trustees
C/O Vancouver School Board
1580 West Broadway
Vancouver, BC
V6J 5K8
Via Email
February 15, 2012
Re: Out In Schools
Attention: Board of School Trustees SD No. 39
Complaint to the Vancouver Board of School Trustees
I, Kari Simpson, President of Culture Guard, make this formal complaint on behalf of Vancouver parents and tax-payers who have fulsome knowledge and concerns about the Out In Schools (“OIS”) program.
Specifically that:
The Vancouver Board of School Trustees (VSB), by endorsing the OIS program and allowing it to be advertised, published and taught in the classrooms and/or other facilities of the Vancouver Public School District, is complicit in distributing false and misleading information to students and parents—thus endangering the health and well-being of children, and breaching the public’s trust.
The Preamble of the School Act states:
WHEREAS it is the goal of a democratic society to ensure that all its members receive an education that enables them to become literate, personally fulfilled and publicly useful, thereby increasing the strength and contributions to the health and stability of that society;
AND WHEREAS the purpose of the British Columbia school system is to enable all learners to become literate, to develop their individual potential and to acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to contribute to a
healthy, democratic and pluralistic society and a prosperous and sustainable economy;
But by engaging in the aforementioned conduct, the Vancouver School Board has acted contrary to the lawful mandate given to the Vancouver School District, and in violation of the spirit, purposes and goals of the BC public education system as established in law.
Further, Section 76 (2) of the School Act requires that “the highest morality” must be inculcated, but no religious dogma or creed is to be taught in a school or Provincial school. The OIS program, and its affiliated contests and goals, breaches Section 76 (2).
Part 1: False and misleading information to parents and students
The Vancouver Board of School Trustees has engaged, whether wittingly or not, in scamming parents and students by facilitating a program that has been falsely marketed to stakeholders.
Specifically that –
a) the OIS program has been presented as an “anti-bullying” program, which it is not;
b) the OIS goal has been alleged to be to “reduce” instances of bullying, but officers of OIS have stated other goals;
c) the OIS program was alleged to have been sent for approval, or approved by the Ministry of Education—neither of which is true;
d) the OIS program was presented as “age-appropriate”;
e) the OIS program is purportedly in compliance with the VSB policies on discrimination, but violates them;
f) the OIS program is presumed to be in compliance with the BC Human Rights Act, but it is not;
g) the OIS program and sponsoring teachers are purported to be in compliance with the BCTF code of Conduct, but they repeatedly violate it.
Part 2: Endangering the health and well-being of children
The Vancouver Board of School Trustees have recklessly breached their responsibility and duty to be guardians of the public’s trust and to protect the health and best interests of minor children, by failing to perform their due diligence in properly researching a program that actually involves the promotion and celebration of dangerous sexual practices. Further, by failing to have full knowledge about this program—a program rooted in political rhetoric, false information, and militant sex activism—the VSB has facilitated a gateway to give access to minors by sex activists, for the purpose of luring and exposing them to sexually explicit material and sexual practices known to be harmful.
Specifically that –
a) By promoting, hosting and endorsing the OIS program—a program that lures and facilitates minor students into being tricked, seduced (by “prizes”!) or scammed into attending sexualized pornographic environments under the guise of an “awards” party—the VSB is complicit in corrupting the morals of minors, and violating the trust of parents.
b) By promoting, hosting and endorsing the OIS program—a program that lures and facilitates minor students into being tricked, seduced (by “prizes”!) or scammed into attending sexualized pornographic environments under the guise of an “awards” party, the VSB has violated the public’s trust.
c) By failing to advise parents, after being informed that students were encouraged and invited to play sex games at an event publicized by OIS program via the VSB, the Board exacerbates the harm.
d) By failing to advise parents that students were possibly exposed to terms that approve of dangerous sexual practices—terms like “rimming”, “butt pirate” and other dangerous sexual acts—the VSB is failing to reduce the harm that could come to students, and is in contravention of the lawful requirements of the School Act for promoting a healthy society.
e) By promoting, hosting and endorsing the OIS program, the VSB has knowingly (or ought to have known) that minor students would be exposed to information that creates an environment of discrimination, hatred and contempt for individuals whose religious beliefs and/or cultural values and/or fact-based commonsense requires a refusal to “celebrate” sex activism or sex activist politics within the schools. These facts contravene the lawful requirement of the School Act that the VSB enable students to “…acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to contribute to a healthy, democratic and pluralistic society…”
f) The OIS program cultivates hatred and contempt for students, teachers, other individuals and groups who are opposed to sex activist propaganda. These include groups and individuals whose convictions are protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as well as groups and individuals who are factually informed of the medical, psychological and societal consequences of dangerous sexual acts and other behaviours that include, but are not limited to sodomy, drug use and promiscuous sexual practices and/or other sexual practices that result in harm; e.g.: multiple partner fellatio (blow jobs) among homosexual males has led to throat cancer at levels higher than lung cancer in smokers.
g) That by engaging and indoctrinating minors in propagandist material, exemplified by the VSB’s endorsement and use of the OIS program and other similar material, the VSB is failing to educate students as to the serious implications to the health of individuals (and the obscene costs to our economy) that are a direct result of sexual promiscuity, and the VSB’s requirement of staff and students to “celebrate” these practices among identifiable groups. This violates the legislated mandate of the public schools.
h) Further, by lying to students about the proven health consequences associated with these acts, as documented by the Centres for Disease Control (and both provincial and federal budgets), the VSB is failing to achieve the established goals of fostering “socially responsible” and “informed” citizens. This failure contravenes the lawful requirement that the VSB ensure that students acquire the necessary knowledge to be a positive contributor to a healthy and sustainable economy.
i) By failing to advise parents of the true facts associated with their children’s attendance and involvement in the OIS program—and the ensuing sex party—the VSB fails to mitigate the harm. Students and parents deserve the truth.
j) Trustees approved the OIS program, relying on unidentified Pride Committee members and/or unidentified staff to determine the alleged appropriateness of a program which was in fact designed to foster values and views that conflict with and undermine the Charter-protected cultural and moral values of important stakeholders.
Part 3: Cultivating ignorance (and ignorant bullies)
The OIS program provides obvious clues that it is unsuitable for school use. The words “homophobia”, “homophobe”, “homophobic” and other similar words are used in conjunction with sex activist propaganda; this cultivates harm, hurt and contempt for individuals and/or groups who oppose the propagation of false and misleading information and/or the promotion and “celebration” of the medically harmful sexual practices and diseases typically associated with sodomy and/or other promiscuous sexual behaviours. The OIS program, as presented, violates the BC Human Rights Code by including words and actions that discriminate against identifiable groups based on their religious beliefs; and also discriminate based on age, race and ethnic background.
Specifically that:
a) The OIS program relies on the repeated use of slurs, such as “homophobia”, “homophobe”, homophobic” and “heterosexist” to demean, demoralize and to cultivate contempt and hatred for Charter-protected groups opposed to homosexual behaviours. These terms violate the spirit and letter of the law; the School Act demands the cultivation of a pluralistic society. The courts have held that the school must protect all students, including those whose religious beliefs oppose homosexuality and students whose fact-based commonsense and well-informed knowledge militate against accepting sex activist propaganda.
b) The OIS program relies on the repeated use of slurs, namely “homophobia”, “homophobe”, and “homophobic” to demean, demoralize and to cultivate contempt and hatred for individuals and/or groups who seek factual discourse on the politics of sex activism.
c) The OIS program relies on the repeated use of slurs, namely “homophobia”, “homophobe”, homophobic” to demean, demoralize and to cultivate contempt and hatred for medical and/or psychological professionals who seek to provide factual research on issues relating to homosexuality and other issues related to sexual identity.
d) The videos used in the OIS program promote hatred and contempt for those who oppose the abuse of children by indoctrinating them with false and misleading information. Further, encourage the use of slurs to demean others.
e) That one of the videos used, distributed and shown in OIS presentations, Peking Turkey, incites contempt for an identifiable group by mocking Chinese-Canadian culture.
f) That a number of the videos seemingly approve of sex activists’ bully tactics, used to make individuals accept them. In one video, a frail 91-year-old man is bullied by a relative into “accepting” her lesbian “identity”. The man dies before the film is finished; but any objective observer would be horrified at the tactics used—and seemingly approved of—by these activists.
g) The OIS’ own promotional videos, published on their website, feature young students resorting to being “bullies” against other students; this behaviour is presented as being acceptable.
Part 4: Partnering up
Unbeknown to parents, the VSB is facilitating the for-profit interests of money-making business endeavours to recruit minor children as future consumers.
Specifically that –
a) The VSB is allowing children to be used as a captive audience in a number of for-profit marketing schemes associated with the OIS program.
b) The VSB has failed to inform parents that their children are being exposed to marketing schemes that seek to recruit a new generation of sex-based consumerism. By endorsing the OIS program, the VSB is “partnering up” with other OIS-sponsoring partners, including XTRA!, a publication owned and operated by Pink Triangle Press, a so-called “non-profit” society, whose mission statement reads in part:
‘Set love free’—We honour lust and seek a world where sex is valued as a human trait, no more no less than any other, and all are free and equal, no matter whom they love.
c) The VSB has failed to inform parents that, in keeping with their mission statement of honouring “lust”, this “non-profit” organization (functioning like a for-profit corporation, except for not having to pay taxes) also operates—as one of many possible examples—a lucrative casual homosexual sex “hook-up” site called “SQUIRT”; and that students are introduced to this profitable marketing strategy through the OIS program, contests and associated parties.
d) The VSB has failed to disclose to parents that XTRA! is also a sponsor of the Queer Film Festival, and has recently ramped-up their public endorsements of OIS, thus integrating themselves deeper into the OIS program—and the influencing of students as a direct result thereof.
e) The VSB has failed to inform parents that the VSB facilitated the use of students as a test market for a new “Dirty, Silly Drinking game” called Lesbian Debauchery during a party that is hosted by OIS and in conjunction with the queer sex festival.
f) Parents have a right to know that the OIS program is a school-based marketing tool for sex consumerism; the VSB has failed to so inform them.
1) That a moratorium be placed immediately on any use of the Out In Schools program in schools or on school property;
2) That parents be notified forthwith that the VSB has failed to advise them of the true nature of this program; specifically that:
a) a moratorium be placed immediately on any use of the Out In Schools) the OIS program is a political indoctrination tool;
b) their children may have been exposed to a false understanding of issues involved in homosexuality;
c) that children were exposed to hate slurs like “homophobe” and “homophobia” as being acceptable, contrary to Charter of Rights, and contrary to policies of mutual acceptance made by the VSB and the BC Human Rights Code;
d) their children may have accessed, through a VSB-approved “youth-link”, a site featuring a hard-core homosexual porn;
e) minor students may have accessed, while researching the OIS program information and the PSA contest rules, information about the Queer Film Festival and the pornographic films associated with that sex festival. These films contained promotional information and material linked to hard-core homosexual porn, violent sex, sex with dead people (necrophilia), sex with animals (bestiality) and other graphic sexual depictions that are unacceptable for minors and unlawful;
f) their children may have been taught to believe that the use of slurs promoted by this program is acceptable;
g) their children may have acquired a false understanding of the dangerous health issues related to homosexuality;
h) their children may have been given a false knowledge base relating to homosexuality, transgenderism and other issues purported to be related to sexual identity.
3) That the Board of School Trustees issues an apology to parents and students for failing to protect their interests.
4) And other provisions to be agreed upon.
Failure to place an immediate moratorium on the OIS program will result in legal action. Further, the failings of this program are not limited to the information contained herein.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of Vancouver parents, students and stakeholders,
Kari D. Simpson
President, Culture Guard
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WHERE: Listen – http://www.roadkillradio.com
EMAIL THE SHOW: Roadkillradio@live.ca
Your Thoughts, Your Opinions, Your Outrage are welcome!
ALL SHOWS ARE ARCHIVED, LISTEN FOR FREE!!!
|
Why are corporate-backed Smart Meters being forced on British Columbians when they prove to be unhealthy, dangerous, and an invasion of your privacy? Kari Simpson and Ron Gray speak with Sal Vetro, who is turning BC’s successful anti-HST machine against this latest attack on our civil rights. Here are some links you will want to check out! |
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Culture Guard news release
For immediate release
October 5, 2011
‘Out In Schools’ update: unanswered questions, boy using girls’ washroom
It looks like OUT IN SCHOOLS (“OIS”) is in damage control mode.
“Since Culture Guard’s first ‘Pornogate’ news release revealed that the program has exposed children to graphic pornography and games, there’s been considerable “editing” on the OIS website!” says Culture Guard president Kari Simpson.
In addition, Culture Guard has learned that a teenage boy at a Burnaby school—who claims he is “transgendered”—insists on using girls’ washrooms. Girls at his school say they don’t feel safe, and some Muslim girls (whose faith says males must not see their uncovered hair) right’s have been violated by his use of the girls washroom while they were using their facility.
The OIS website used to say the program had been submitted to the Ministry of Education for approval; that claim has recently been taken off the website.
The name of Romi Chandra (spouse of NDP MLA and sex activist Spencer Chandra Herbert), the author of the OIS “teachers’ guide,” has also recently been eliminated from the OIS website.
Few interviews have been granted by OIS facilitator Ross Johnstone or by Drew Dennis, Executive Director for OUT ON SCREEN, the “society” that acts as the umbrella organization for both OIS and the Queer Film Festival. But neither man has denied Culture Guard’s factual assertions that the OIS program lures students and exposes them to graphic homosexual pornography.
Ross Johnstone did offer one comforting assurance in his interview with the BC Catholic newspaper: “Alcohol is not served…”
TELUS, one of the major corporate funders of OIS, has begun a damage control campaign. The telecommunications giant has sent letters to individuals who protested TELUS’s financial support for an organization that uses deception to manipulate parents, students and other educational stakeholders.
Jill Schnarr, Vice President of Community Affairs for TELUS, was the signatory on letters passed on to Culture Guard by active citizens. Ms. Schnarr went so far as to contact one individual by phone, and assured him that TELUS had ceased funding the OUT IN SCHOOLS program. However, while the “TELUS” logo has been removed from the list of supporters on the OIS website, CAYA—TELUS’ pro-gay retail division—is featured in its place.
The CAYA site still says proudly that TELUS is still funding and supporting the OIS program, which lures and grooms children with political propaganda, sex activism and graphic gay porn.
Kari Simpson, President of Culture Guard, says she will ask the organization’s fast-growing constituency—which was easily mobilized in 2001 to help obliterate the NDP, when it declared war on BC’s schools (click here for the “Most Dangerous Woman in BC” article)—to begin a letter-writing campaign to PavCo, asking them rethink any consideration of awarding TELUS naming rights to the revamped BC Place Stadium.
Simpson says, “I can forgive TELUS for its initial support of OIS, even though it was negligent not to do its due diligence; but when they start playing name games to mislead their own subscribers, that’s ethically wrong and corporately irresponsible. Any corporation funding a program after they’ve been told it betrays the trust of parents and taxpayers, and exposes children to pornography, has earned the contempt of consumers, the government, the business community and the public.”
Mrs. Simpson has written a letter to Ross Johnstone asking 47 hard questions that she says should have been asked by school boards and responsible corporate citizens before they even touched the OIS program.
For example, Simpson states in her letter that Nancy Walt, for the Ministry of Education, has stated in writing that the Ministry of Education has not received any kind of request from OIS for approval. But until recently, the OIS website stated that Ministry approval had been requested. “How can this be?” she asks Mr. Johnstone. “Is Ms. Walt, or someone else, lying?”
Question 4 of her letter asks: “Have you falsely asserted to sponsors and/or funders that this resource had in fact been sent for approval to the Ministry of Education?”
In her complaint to the Vancouver Police Department, Mrs. Simpson pointed out that if funders were deceived to obtain funds under false pretenses that would constitute a violation under the Criminal Code.
[Update: Click here to see how the complaint was rejected by the receiving officer!]
Referring to the “Fierce and Fabulous under-25” party to which OIS invited adolescents, Simpson tells Johnstone: “Now, you haven’t been quite honest with the media about your promotion of the H.I.M. organization—promotion that was not limited to just the reference to the youth resource link (in the teachers’ guide & website), but also included H.I.M.’s very visible participation at the party to which you invited students.
“I am familiar with the H.I.M. organization, and its graphically pornographic promotional material distributed and displayed in large poster form at public venues like the Pride Parade and the ‘Fierce and Fabulous’ party held August 12th,” she declares.
She then asks: “Did you advise parents that their children would be exposed to graphic homosexual pornography? Did you advise the various Boards of School Trustees that students would be exposed to graphic pornography? Did you advise sponsors and funders of OIS that students would be exposed to graphic pornography?”
Simpson says many more questions need answering; but the most important one is: “How did this program and its social-sexual political agenda ever gain access to students? It is grossly flawed and a complete violation of trust and the well-being of children, it is time for Premier Clark to demonstrate real leadership and call for a full investigation,” she said today.
=30=
Click here for the letter Simpson sent to Ross Johnstone
Click here for the Culture Guard video update.
Contact: Kari Simpson – cultureguard@gmail.com
Contact Elected Officials!
Premier Christy Clark –
Tel: (250) 387-1715, Email: premier@gov.bc.ca
George Abbott, Minister for Education –
Tel (250) 387-1977, Email: minister.educ@gov.bc.ca
Kevin Falcon, Minister of Finance –
Tel (250) 387-3751, Email finance.minister@bc.gov.ca
Ida Chong, Minister Community, Sport and Cultural Development –
Tel: (250)387-2283, Email: cscd.minister@gov.bc.ca
Demand that:
Contact Sponsors!
BC Arts Council –
Tel (250) 356-1718, Email bcartscouncil@gov.bc.ca
Telus – Darren Entwistle, President & CEO –
Tel: (604) 697-8044, Email: Darren.entwistle@telus.com
Vancouver Foundation –
Tel: (604) 688-2204 Email: paulh@vancouverfoundation.ca
Vancity –
https://www.vancity.com/ContactUs/GeneralFeedback/
Demand that:
One more important contact!
Our tax-funded BC Place Stadium is about to grant a multi-million dollar contract to a corporation for the naming rights to the stadium, TELUS is said to be the leading contender! Do you want your stadium named after a corporation that facilitates, through the schools, minors being indoctrinated with sex activism and pornography?
Contact:
Pat Bell, Minister for Jobs Tourism & Innovation –
(Minister responsible for BC Place stadium)
Tel (250) 356-2771, Email: jti.minister@gov.bc.ca
Warren Buckley, President & CEO PavCo –
(Corporation that runs BC Place)Tel: (604) 484-5210, Email: awagner@bcpavco.com
Demand that:
TELUS be removed from the list of corporations in the running for this contract until such time as they publicly state that they have stopped funding and sponsoring the OUT IN SCHOOLS programs!
Culture Guard news release
For immediate release
VANCOUVER, Sept. 15, 2011 (Culture Guard) — Gay pornography is being promoted in some BC schools under the guise of “anti-bullying” programs, RoadKill Radio co-host Kari Simpson charged yesterday at a news conference called by Culture Guard, an organization to promote citizen activism.
After revealing that online gay porn videos and other forms of pornography are being promoted in some BC schools by an “anti-bullying” program called Out In Schools, Mrs. Simpson took her evidence to the Vancouver Police to file citizen complaints of possible Criminal Code violations by Out in Schools and the Queer Film Festival. Those complaints include Internet luring of children; exposing children to pornography; and possible fraud, by obtaining money from corporate donors to the program under false pretenses. She also named the BC Teachers’ Federation and the Vancouver School Board in the complaints.
[Update: Click here to see how the complaint was rejected by the receiving officer!]
Out in Schools was written by Romi Chandra, the domestic partner of NDP MLA Spencer Chandra Herbert. Mrs. Simpson said that in addition to money obtained by the program from corporate sponsors, more than $370,000 of taxpayers’ money had been contributed by the provincial government. Out in Schools is already being used in schools in Vancouver, Burnaby, and Haida Gwaii.
The list of “student resources” in the teachers’ guide, purchased by school boards and apparently approved by the Ministry of Education, includes Health Initiative for Men, an Internet web-site that includes videos of gay pornography. The BCTF has endorsed the program.
One of the activities under the so-called “anti-bullying” program invites students to create a short “anti-homophobia” video to be used as a public service announcement, and to enter their videos in a contest run by “Out On Screens.” The winning PSAs are promised prizes and public recognition at a presentation ceremony. That ceremony is, in fact, to be held in conjunction with Vancouver’s Queer Film Festival, an annual porn-fest.
Students who attend the PSA awards ceremony are also invited to a “Fierce and Fabulous Under-25 party” that includes playing “Lesbian Debauchery”, described by the QFF as “a dirty drinking game.” Displays of gay pornography are evident at the party and awards presentation.
Out in Schools says it is intended for secondary school students, but Culture Guard has obtained photographic evidence of it being presented at elementary schools by Out in Schools facilitators Ross Johnstone and Jen “Jenderfuck” Sung.
Also participating at the news conference were representatives of Parents’ Voice, organized this summer to challenge questionable materials being introduced into Burnaby schools; and Take Back Our Schools, a consortium of four BC groups concerned about students, families and parents’ rights.
=30=
contact: Kari Simpson (604) 514-1614
This is Part 2 of a series by Culture Guard that exposes the hidden political agenda behind BC’s “Out In Schools” program.
Please note: Please read, listen, and check facts before making snap judgements and leaving uninformed comments. You can start by visiting Part 1 here.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Culture Guard News Release
For immediate release
PORNOGATE!
Sex activists scam school boards with ‘anti-bullying’ program OUT IN SCHOOLS, luring students to porn sites—and more!
Sept. 12, 2011 (Culture Guard) — NDP MLA Spencer Chandra Herbert’s “spouse”, Romi Chandra, is the author of OUT IN SCHOOLS—a gateway program used to sexualise students and introduce them to homosexualist “culture”; OUT IN SCHOOLS is endorsed by the BC Teachers’ Federation and heavily funded by BC taxpayers and corporate sponsors.
Kari Simpson, former Executive Director of the Citizens Research Institute, and now President of Culture Guard—a new national organization that works on behalf of civil, common-sense Canadians—said today:
“I believe parents will be shocked and righteously angry when they find out what their children have been subjected to. I hope parents sue their local school boards! I doubt that the OUT IN SCHOOLS ‘Youth Resources’, which direct students to hard-core pornography, including ‘gay’ porn and homosexist propaganda, fits within Section 76 (2) of the School Act, which mandates that ‘the highest morality shall be inculcated’.”
The OUT IN SCHOOLS “Teachers’ Guide” states that it is a secondary school resource; but Culture Guard has obtained pictures of OUT IN SCHOOLS facilitators Ross Johnstone and Jen “Jenderfuck” Sung presenting it in elementary schools.
“The scandalous problems associated with the program don’t stop with the OUT IN SCHOOLS-recommended ‘youth resources’ or the political and homosexist left-wing propaganda that fill its pages,” says Simpson. “There are serious and possibly criminal activities involved with this program.”
A news conference will be held at 11 a.m. Tuesday, September 13, 2011 in front of the BC Teachers’ Federation Offices, located at 100-550 West 6th Avenue, Vancouver.
now at CultureGuard.com;
Two videos, OUT IN SCHOOLS is No Picnic and Scammed, Swooned & Corrupted are available for viewing. Viewers should be warned that portions of the video are explicit, and not suitable for younger viewers—including those of the target ages of the in-school program, OUT IN SCHOOLS.
Members of the media who attend will be given password-limited access to details of the Police complaint to be filed earlier the same day. At the news conference, Kari Simpson will disclose shocking details that Culture Guard has exposed involving the OUT IN SCHOOLS program, and the games they like children to play.
[Update: Click here to see how the complaint was rejected by the receiving officer!]
=30=
For more information please contact Kari Simpson 604 514-1614 or by e-mail: cultureguard@gmail.com
