SOGI Backgrounder

 Comments Off on SOGI Backgrounder
May 042017
 

culture guard

Radical Sex Activism In BC Schools

Backgrounder: SOGI (Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity)

May 4, 2017 – This is a special note to all parents:  There is an active  agenda within BC schools (And across Canada and the USA) to undermine your relationship with your children, undermine societal values and to sexualize your children. Your children are being used as political pawns.  One of these programs is called SOGI, it is designed to create societal disruption.

Homosexuality and gender deviancy is nothing new.  History provides us with examples of what happens when sex activism is allowed to flourish.   Without exception, there comes a point, usually because of the health, medical and social costs and consequences, where the pendulum swings back, and reason prevails. The time is now to end the insanity.  

Your child’s school has now been ordered to comply with the sex activists agenda.  Teachers can no longer refer to children as “boys and girls”.  To do so would be “to impose a binary gender assignment” that violates the sex activists’ view of how children should be raised.  When talking about families, teachers are prohibited from using the terms “mom” and “dad,” and are instead directed to refer to your role simply “parent” or “guardian.”  The new directives do not stop there.  Get informed!

Other changes you need to be aware of.  Your child’s school bathroom can now be used by gender deviants.   Men/boys dressed up as—or “identify” as women/girls—can now use your daughter’s school change room, access the girls/womans change facilities at your local recreation centre or community swimming pool…as a few examples. Churches, Mosques, Synagogues and daycares are now prohibited from “discriminating” against those who claim to “identify” differently from their birth identity as male or female.    

Please forward this information to everyone on your email list and/or post to your social media!

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

SOGI BACKGROUNDER

Why is the BC Minister of Education trying to deceive parents?
On September 8, 2016, the BC Minister for Education, Mike Bernier, announced the adoption of the controversial and explicit terms of “Sexual Orientation” and “Gender Identity” (SOGI), made mandatory in so-called “anti-bullying policies” that all school districts and independent schools are now required to have in place.  During the same press conference, a new ‘partnership’ with the ARC Foundation was also announced.

The BC government propagandized the announcement with a stock photo that featured a very sad looking little girl, and deliberately misled readers to believe that this move was simply to enhance “anti-bullying” policies.

In reality what  the Christy Clark government did was to usher in a radical pro-homosexual, pro-gender-bender, pro-promiscuity sex agenda without consulting parents or taxpayers. They did this under the deceptive guise of “anti-bullying.”

The announcement goes on to state:

All public school boards are required to have codes of conduct in their schools to address bullying by articulating the prohibited grounds of discriminationas set out in the British Columbia Human Rights Code, acceptable and unacceptable behaviours and consequences.

Independent schools are required to have policies promoting safety, respect and acceptance of all students; anti-bullying and harassment policies; and educational programs addressing these issues.

Districts and schools have until the end of this year to update their anti-bullying policies.

Tricky Wording, Designed to Dupe Parents
Militant sex activist NDP MLA Spencer Chandra-Herbert, who is well known for his willingness to lie about issues, and who has lobbied for years to cut funding to private schools, was ecstatic at the news; and perhaps he said it best: “The devil will be in the details” according to his interview with XTRA, the LGBTQ++ community newspaper.

So how did we get from adding a few explicit propaganda terms like “Gender Identity,” to school districts’ codes of conduct, to a full-on assault in which the sexual anarchist political agenda is forced on students from K to 12, violating the rights and sensibilities of the majority of parents, just to appease a few sex activists?

 

The BC Liberals secretly amended BCs’ Human Rights Code

 

christy clark                                                                                                                                               Photo credit BC Provincial Gov

There was no advance notice—at least, not to the general public—about the July 25, 2016 surprise mid-summer first reading (and second and third!) of Bill 27 to amend the BC Human Rights Act; yet somehow 100+ sex activists had poured into the public gallery of the BC Legislature to watch Bill 27 rammed through into law—all in one day!  

The amendment to the already controversial BC Human Rights Code now includes whatever I want my “gender identity” to be on any given day.  Attorney General, Suzanne Anton, introduced the Bill, and it was on a fast track thereafter, receiving first, second, the façade of a committee hearing, and third reading—all in a matter of hours.

The amending of the BC Human Rights Code was the catalyst for the introduction of the mandatory code of conduct and the learning outcomes now required by the Ministry of Education.  

Under the recent amendments to the BC Human Rights Code, and according to the “SOGI” mandates of BC’s Minister of Education, sex activist men who dress—or “identify”—as women (like the ones pictured above celebrating with the Premier and the Attorney General on July 25, 2016) can now use the girls/women’s washrooms in schools, daycares, churches, mosques, museums, amusement parks, public swimming pools, or recreation centre showers; and they can join all-female gyms.

This move creates other problems.  For instance, it is uncertain as to how Canada will now track sexually- transmitted diseases. If one of these individuals contracts HIV, will the record now be deceptively reported as a female case, thus skewing the data? This is one example of hundreds systemic disruptions that will result.

Parents Need To KNOW!
What parents need to know is that the Ministry of Education requires certain learning outcomes for Kindergarten to Grade 12 students in a variety of subject matters. And this is where those devilish details will affect BC children, as radical sex activists and their organizations—such as Out in Schools—“facilitate” teachers in meeting these required outcomes by going into schools, under the guise of “anti-bullying” programs to indoctrinate students with their sex activist agenda.

Every child, in every school—including private schools—is being targeted.

Below is a picture of another program (there are lots of them!), Vancouver’s “Pride Speaks” that is “facilitating” the introduction of sex activism into a grade 7 classroom.

grade 7

                                                                                                                                           Photo credit – Pridespeaks website

The promotional material for the “PrideSpeaks” session for Kindergarten – Grade 3 (5-8 years olds), as one example, describes the indoctrination and psychological conditioning of young children:

K-3 — Gender

(40 minutes)

  • What is gender? Exploring gender diversity
  • Reading a picture book about gender diversity written by a young transgender child (“ I Am Jazz”)
  • Discussion about the story
  • Empathy exercise to demonstrate what being a good friend looks like for students who come out as transgender or gender variant
  • Presenters sharing coming out stories

School districts and independent schools have been ordered to add Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity politics to their codes of conduct, giving special rights to LGBTQ2++ political platforms by introducing one-sided “celebratory” propaganda and failing to inform students factually about the mental health risks and issues, medical costs to taxpayers, epidemic STDs and social costs commonly associated with LGBTQ++ persons.  

There will be no factual information presented as to the obvious problems associated with two men playing at being mom/dad or daddy/dad …,or how a transgendered person is really a “they”. Instead teachers have already been directed in the SOGI-targeted pilot schools not to use the words “mom”, “dad”, “mother” or “father” any more, but to instead use terms like “partner.” It is also ‘wrong’ to address children as “boys and girls”; instead, teachers are told to use words like “students”.

 Minister of Education in bed with Sex Activists

Also attending the September 8, 2016, policy announcement by Education Minister Bernier, who has a lesbian daughter, were the militant left-wing President of the BC Teachers’ Federation, Glen Hansman; ARC Foundation Executive Director and sex activist Brad Beattie; and FISA (Federation of Independent School Association) President Doug Lauson.

During this joint press conference portion of the announcement, the Minister for Education also informed us that he had entered into a “partnership” with the ARC Foundation, sponsor of the SOGI (Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity) program in schools.

Unbeknownst to most people—because there was no public consultation and no media coverage—the engines of the sex activist organization known as the ARC Foundation has been conspiring with the provincial government for at least the last two years to  implement their “SOGI Education Initiative,” an initiative that mandates the political and sexual corruption of your children. The announcement states:

In addition, the ARC Foundation, based in B.C., is funding a new Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) Education Advisor position to help school districts and independent schools develop the required policies and ‘voluntary’ anti-bullying programs to ensure they are inclusive of sexual orientation and gender identity.

ARC Foundation’s current focus is the SOGI Education Initiative, which it says “aims to facilitate collaboration, programming and funding to ensure every school in British Columbia provides a safe and inclusive environment for every child.”

ARC Foundation, Perverting Your Child’s Education
It seems that the ARC Foundation—and its big-spending sex activist Trustee, Robert Quartermain—donated his way to seduce the BC Liberal party into “partnering” with him and his abusive agenda.

This agenda is not about respect, nor even anti-bullying; it is a radical and dangerous social experiment designed to undermine parental authority, and the values and societal structures that have served our nation well.

What Parents should know about the ARC Foundation
The ARC Foundation, as a “charity,” funds—in part—the annual Queer Film Festival and the controversial Out in Schools program. Out in Schools deceptively markets itself to schools and parents as an “anti-bullying” program.

queer film festival

                                                                                                                                                   Photo credit – Out on Screen

Out in Schools doesn’t disagree that their program is a “guerilla marketing” tactic to get more children/students to attend the Queer Film Festival, thus exposing children to the politics of sex activism and hard-core pornography that are central to the QFF.

Out in Schools delivers the radicalized vocabulary of sex activism and incorporates identity politics into their in-school presentations. Those presentations and the presenters have no educational credentials or credible research basis. The American College of Pediatricians has denounced transgender education and therapy as dangerous to children.

CultureGuard exposed the Out In Schools program in 2011, but the left-wing Vancouver media refused to report on it with the exception of a small mention by Janet Stefenhagen in her education column. See video part 1 here and part 2 here. Warning graphic images.

Students are emotionally bullied into compliance, being forced to engage in activities that violate their rights, with teachers in some cases threatening to fail students if they don’t embrace the sex activist ideology. Political posters now fill the walls of some schools with sexual activists rhetoric. Here are just 4 examples supplied by the BC Teacher’s Federation.  There are hundreds available.
out in schools

School presentations are void of any effort to discuss social responsibility as far as not engaging in sexual activities that result in costing taxpayers billions of dollars. Instead, students are encouraged to be “sex positive,” among other things, and conditioned to remain silent if they don’t agree. The few students who are brave enough to speak out against this agenda are condemned, labeled “homophobic” and other nasty bully terms.

These presentations have been happening without informed parental knowledge or consent in most cases, for the last 5 years in some activist districts.  Now every school district in BC is mandated to indoctrinate students.

The Out in Schools program, authored by Romi Chandra-Herbert and other radical sex activists, has been designated as the vehicle for delivery of these learning outcomes by the SOGI partnership with the Ministry of Education.

SOGI 123
The SOGI curriculum encourages teachers to use these steps.

FIRST STEPS TO USING INCLUSIVE LANGUAGE:

Use Gender-Free Phrasing

Talk in a way that does not specify a gender, sex, or sexual orientation unless it is pertinent to the comment.

e.g., “Good morning everyone.” instead of “Good morning boys and girls.”

e.g., “Students should turn in their papers.” instead of “Each student should turn in his/her paper.”

Use Language For All Families

Refer to a student’s “family” and “parents” instead of “mom and dad” to include students who may have single, step or LGBTQ parents, or alternate guardians.

e.g., “Please tell your parents or guardian.” instead of “Please tell your mom and dad.”

Expand Your Vocabulary

SOGI-related vocabulary is always evolving. Do not hesitate to ask questions about and get clarity on respectful language for talking about sexual orientation and gender identity.

According to the SOGI website, the BC SOGI Educator Network was formally launched as a pilot project at the beginning of the 2016/2017 year by ARC Foundation and nine BC school districts: Vancouver, North Vancouver, West Vancouver, Burnaby, Langley, Delta, Sea to Sky, Nanaimo-Ladysmith, and Kamloops/Thompson.

The SOGI website lists these 10 Key components, read them carefully.  This is what is happening in BC Classrooms:

Here are ten key components for effective SOGI-inclusive policies and procedures:

This list was compiled by the Ministry of Education/SOGI Working Group.

  1. Common Language

All parties will be we||-informed of and equipped with appropriate and respectful language.

  1. Safety/Anti-Harassment

Proactive and reactive measures that include sexual orientation and gender identity will impact all students.

  1. Self-Identification

Students will have the right to self-identification, which includes the name by which they wish to be addressed and the preferred pronouns that correspond to their gender identity.

  1. Confidentiality

         Students will have the right to the confidentiality of their official and/or preferred sex, gender, and name.

  1. Dress Guidelines

         Students may express their gender identity or gender expression through what they wear to school. A dress code should be as all—inclusive as possible, which may include removing

        pronouns.

  1. Gender Integrated And Inclusive Activities

         Integrated and inclusive activities will enable students to join teams and groups that they feel correspond with their gender identity.

  1. Educator Training

         All staff will be provided with knowledge and tools to develop a broad understanding of SOGI and the impact on students.

  1. Inclusive Learning

         Classroom materials and activities will contain positive images and accurate information about sexual and/or gender diversity.

  1. Facilities

        Individuals may choose to use washrooms and change rooms that match their gender identity, including non-gendered single-stall washrooms and change rooms.

  1. Inclusive Extra-Curricular Activities

         Students will be included and accommodated for in all extra-curricular activities regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, including support to set up a Gender-  

        SexualityAlliance/Gay-Straight Alliance or similar club.

 

On or about September 8, 2016, the ARC Foundation published on its website (http://www.arcfoundation.ca/sogi-education-initiative) the announcement made by the BC Government that it has “partnered” with the British Columbia Ministry of Education, and listed these activities in which the ‘partnership’ is already engaged:

 Ministry Of Education SOGI Education Liaison
Just Announced — ARC Foundation has partnered with the Ministry of Education by funding a new Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Education Liaison position to support school districts and independent schools to develop their policies and voluntary anti-bullying programs, to be inclusive of sexual orientation and gender identity. This position will be funded for the first year by ARC Foundation starting September 2016 with the Ministry of Education providing implementation support.

School District Operations
Just Launched — Expanding on the success of the Delta School District Pilot (2015-2016), the School District’s SOGI Pilot is providing a peer network, onboarding, and training tools, including an online district—wide toolkit, to 6-8 SOGI Coordinators within BC school districts in 2016/17.

SOGI Resource Development
Just Launched — The new SOGI Resource Development Lead at the UBC Faculty of Education is focused on developing and distributing a robust set of SOGI content and resources throughout the university and its academic network across Canada. A key responsibility of this dedicated, full-time role is the review of curriculum for UBC’s Teacher Education program to incorporate SOGI education.

SOGI Competency Training For BC Teachers
Just Launched — Addressing the present need for SOGI competency training among the province’s teachers, ARC Foundation is working with the Ministry of Education, BC Teachers Federation, UBC Faculty of Education and Out in Schools to deliver the SOGI Education Leadership Summit, a day-long professional development conference for teachers in October 2016. The Summit is an opportunity for SOGI stakeholders and educators in pilot districts to come together and explore opportunities for increasing SOGI capacity and enhancing the student experience within schools.

 

ARC buys its way into UBC
The ARC Foundation gifted the University of BC with $125,000 to be used to indoctrinate new teachers, and also to provide training for teachers currently in the education system. The buzz-worded goals should have every thinking citizen ready to rally in opposition and demand repeal of all gender identity provisions within our laws and policies.

The “goals” of the fund, are in part, to achieve the following:

– To implement transformation towards social justice goals at a faculty-wide scale at the University of British Columbia, so as to create and maintain an LGBT2Q inclusive curriculum, culture, workplace, and learning environment

– To prioritize systemic, faculty-wide interventions that focus on sexual orientation and gender identity as critical pillars in the architecture of human rights risks, resiliencies and interventions that aim to redress inequities and enhance social sustainability

– To design, innovate and implement whole-climate pedagogical approaches that recognize, and intervene to transform, the impacts of systemic discrimination

This is a Political Agenda

Every British Columbia is a stakeholder in the education system.  Your voice matters.  Thousands of parents have already joined in this battle.  Add your voice!  

Kari Simpson, Executive Director for Culture Guard has been the voice for parents on this issue.  Kari was central to the defeat of the last provincial government, the NDP, in the 2001 election after they engaged in anti-family, anti-parent, pro-sex activist agenda within the schools.  The NDP were politically obliterated being left with only 2 seats after the general election.  Clearly the BC Liberals need the same lesson.  

Add your voice, subscribe to Culture Guard and be a part of the solution to save the BC Education system and stop the abuse of BC Kids!

Contact: Kari Simpson

Email: CultureGuard@gmail.com     Phone: 604 514-1614

Click here: Kari Simpson’s letter to ARC Foundation Trustee Robert Quartermain

Click here: Media Release – 100-plus sex activists in bed with Christy Clark and her Cabinet?

Click here : PDF copy of this SOGI backgrounder

RoadKill Radio: Mike Schouten on the Ivana Levkovic Baby-Dumping Case

 Comments Off on RoadKill Radio: Mike Schouten on the Ivana Levkovic Baby-Dumping Case
May 072013
 

We Need a Law spokesman Mike Schouten joins Ron Gray and Kari Simpson for a lively discussion on the murderous realities of abortion in Canada and the absurdity of the language that masks the facts. Are things starting to change? The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Levkovic gives some hope that Canada is moving in the right direction. Perhaps one day unborn babies might be worthy of protection.

Drive For Justice 34: Where We Go From Here

 Comments Off on Drive For Justice 34: Where We Go From Here
Apr 222013
 

"Drive For Justice" host Ron Gray wraps up – for now – this series exposing the lies, corruption and deceit of Canada's legal brethren as it pertains to Kari Simpson's ongoing case against The Liar Rafe Mair, correctly implicating the corrupt Judge Mary Marvyn Koenigsberg and exposing the Supreme Court of Canada's lies and failure to adhere to the Letter of the Law. Mr. Gray then introduces the next phase of "Drive For Justice", which promises to open a Pandora's Box of judicial shenanigans.

Galganov: The Courts Are ANTI-FREEDOM

 1 Response »
Mar 202013
 

UNAFFORDABLE JUSTICE IS NO JUSTICE AT ALL:

When there’s no real justice for people in the courts or government . . . where do people who have been done-in by the system turn to next?

The terrible answer to this question is NOWHERE . . . where we really want to be, and that’s the rudiment of revolutions.

I have spent much of my life around animals, big and small. And amongst the many things I discovered in the animal world, is that we humans are not all that much different from them.

We have our joys and fears. We “scrounge” for food. And we seek shelter when and where we can, just like animals do. AND WE DEFEND OUR LIBERTY where and when we can.

The intelligence factor between the animal world and our world is secondary to our naturally born instincts. And here is where we share more in common with the animal world – than not.

Just like humans, most animals are satisfied to live their lives amongst their own kind in peace. But, also just like humans, there are animals within their own kind who fight to dominate.

And then there are the hunters who feed off the gatherers.

Are You a Cowering Animal?

Are You a Cowering Animal?

The gatherers tend to flee and/or hide when chased by the hunters in both worlds, as we can see when the Lion chases down the Gazelle amongst a fleeing herd, whose only objective amongst the individual members of the herd is not to be the one to be caught and killed by the Lion.

THE BEST HUMAN EXAMPLE EVER:

When the Nazis and their European Allies hunted down the Jews, they too (the Jewish herd) ran and hid like gatherers in the animal world . . . rather than fight.

And even when their backs were up against the wall, and their loved-ones threatened, instead of fighting, they prayed, they begged, and they hoped for the best.

DO ALL ANIMALS COWER, RUN, AND HIDE?

Anne and I have a pony who’s about 600 pounds. But . . . pound for pound, he’s tougher than either of our two twelve hundred pound horses. And when challenged, not only will this pony stand his ground, it’s just as likely that he’ll go at his challenger.

I’ve seen videos of Wildebeest circling the proverbial wagons when confronted by Lions. So, not all gatherers will succumb quietly to the threats of the hunters.

THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL . . . is the animal that is cornered, which sees no chance for flight, which by nature would never fight, but very well might when there is no other choice.

I’ve even seen mice bare their teeth to cats when their hope is zero.

AND THAT’S WHO MANY OF US ARE TOO.

Not every European Jew willingly stepped into the Cattle Car, or stood over the grave that he or she had dug for himself or herself. Not every European Jew listened with obedience to the commands of his or her tormentors, or his or her co-religionist Quislings.

When people are pushed into a corner, it is indeed a reality that some, just like otherwise gentle animals will fight back, and MORE likely than not, perhaps not a majority, but some nonetheless, will fight long before they are forced into that position.

Think about how few Patriots there were in the 1770’s who really took on the British, driving-out the greatest empire at that time.

OUR COURTS ARE DEFILING OUR FREEDOMS . . . YET – WE’RE NOT FIGHTING BACK:

NOT YET ANYWAYS . . .

In Canada . . . Racist French TRIBALISTS in four small Ontario (Canada) Townships passed a bylaw FORBIDDING the stand-alone use of the English language on private commercial signs, making the unrestricted use of the English language against the law in a province that is NINETY-SIX PERCENT NOT French.

Even the Courts agreed that this FORCED bilingual sign bylaw violated Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But – said in their judgments; that under the circumstance to help promote the French language, that negating Freedom of Expression for English speakers was the right thing to do.

My case was simple . . .

Do these FORCED bilingual laws violate my FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION? – YES OR NO?

ALMOST THREE QUARTERS OF A MILLION DOLLARS over a period of some 4 years, and losses at the Ontario Superior Court and the Ontario Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada decided without explanation NOT TO HEAR OUR APPEAL, rendering the FORCED bilingual sign law the law of Canada.

All of the judicial decisions from court to court were in themselves reprehensible. But, what was as much a TRAVESTY of Justice and FREEDOM, and perhaps even more so to the actual decisions, were the costs PILED-UP by the lawyers and the Courts over a ridiculous period of time to decide upon a simple question.

CAN YOU AFFORD TO PAY OVER $350,000 TO DEFEND YOUR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION?

Was my RIGHT to FREEDOM of EXPRESSION Violated as is clearly SPELLED-OUT in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms under Section 2b?

THE ANSWER IS YES . . . So – what do I do when the judicial system is ESTABLISHED to make lawyers rich, while at the same time, gives judges the undisputed RIGHT to add or remove CONSTITUTIONAL guarantees as they so desire?

And if the courts can take away my FREEDOM of expression with impunity, what else can they take away from me AND YOU?

DIDN’T THE AMERICAN SUPREME COURT RULE AGAINST FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE?

There is no question or argument . . . none whatsoever, that the government, according to the US Constitution cannot ORDER a person to purchase a product or a service.

Yet, that is exactly what the US Supreme Court did in deciding upon the legitimacy of Obamacare, simply by defining the forced participation of the people as a tax, opposed to being a FORCED purchase.

So . . . What does an American, or an American company do when he or she does not want to purchase Obamacare for whatever reason?

I WANT TO GO BACK TO THE LOSS OF MY FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN CANADA.

For me to go to court to MAINTAIN . . . not to win anything, but just to MAINTAIN my Freedom of Expression, my personal cost was MORE than $350,000.

I had to pay my lawyers more than $100,000, and a portion of the other side’s lawyers to the tune of $250,000 of their costs.

I AM ASKING THESE QUESTIONS IN FULL KNOWLEDGE OF YOUR ANSWER:

Would you personally be prepared or capable of paying $350,000 or more to defend your RIGHT to Freedom of Expression?

Would you be willing to risk as much as, and more than $350,000 of your own money and future to fight for the FREEDOMS of others?

If you are not capable of paying for what should be your day in court . . . WHERE IS YOUR RIGHT TO JUSTICE?

REMEMBER WHAT I WROTE ABOUT PASSIVE ANIMALS:

As more people in the USA and Canada are denied their very basic RIGHTS and FREEDOMS through political and judicial intimidation, coupled to CRIPPLING costs, people will find another way to seek redress and justice.

When cornered with nowhere to go, even some of the most passive animals will bare their teeth, knowing full well that there is no way they can survive, but they will fight nonetheless.

The governments that should be of the people, by the people and for the people as Abraham Lincoln stated in his Gettysburg Address should think long and hard about the potential of people who are fed-up, and have their backs up against the wall.

In my next editorial . . . I will explain how we are sticking it to the lawyers, the courts and the politicians.

Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov

Drive For Justice 33: Upping the Ante – Now $130,000 in Rewards Offered!!!

 2 Responses »
Mar 182013
 

Ron Gray presents big cash incentives to those of you who want to help Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin maintain her lies about Kari Simpson. Chief Bevy's fate is in your hands, folks, since failure to prove her lies will mean she will have to resign from the court! You see, contrary to the legal requirement of proving a case involving libel, defendant Rafe Mair failed to provide any foundation for his lies, admitting that he never even heard Kari Simpson speak on the issues central to the case. But Chief Bevy decided to believe Mair's unfounded lies and went a step further by publishing his lies as the "factual" basis of her decision.

Here's the deal: Produce verifiable evidence (not hearsay or more lies) that makes any of these lies true. This is your chance – 4 chances, actually – to make big money by merely proving what Rafe Mair, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, and the 2008 Supreme Court of Canada (the panel that presided over Simpson's case) say about Kari Simpson. Simply prove to us and to the world that Kari Simpson led the opposition to the infamous "3 Books" in Surrey, or that she's "opposed to any positive portrayal of a gay lifestyle," or that she's intolerant of homosexuals and/or is anti-gay, or – for the really big money – that the Supreme Court of Canada has any right to change a legal test and then use the new test to make a finding without letting the parties know the legal test they have to meet.

So far it's looking bad for Chief Justice Bevy. Since no one is stepping up with the evidence, she should start packing up her office. Canadians will not tolerate a liar and an arrogant, out-of-touch cheat for a Chief Justice of the high court!

NewsTalk770: Bill Whatcott on the Rob Breakenridge Show

 2 Responses »
Mar 132013
 

Bill Whatcott spoke to Rob Breakenridge of NewsTalk770.com about the recent Supreme Court of Canada's upholding of suppression of free speech in Canada. Listen to this informative discussion about how the courts are systematically stripping away the rights of Canadians – especially Canadians with religious or moral beliefs.

Freedom of Speech Diminished by Supreme Court of Canada

 Comments Off on Freedom of Speech Diminished by Supreme Court of Canada
Mar 092013
 

TO:  Each judge of the Supreme Court of Canada
March 4, 2013

Your recent decision regarding the Whatcott case is EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTING in that it further restricts freedom of speech in Canada.

Your decision indicates that a claimant is allowed to make a complaint to the Human Rights Commission or the courts if that person is “offended” by something I may have said to him/her.  That is so broad it is Gestapo-like fearful to us.

On the Supreme Court website, beside a photo of Justice McLachlin, she makes a statement about Canada’s Supreme Court philosophy: “accommodation of differences”.  These three words clash with what your decision amounts to.  You make no “accommodation” for people of faith to freely express their beliefs with full religious conviction.

i.e. I talk to my neighbor and tell him about God’s Word as recorded in the Bible and he gets offended.  I cannot and will not apologize for having quoted a direct quote from the Bible.  He then can, with the endorsement of the recent decision, lodge a complaint about me having offended him.

Does this not justify the common perception that comes from the public that you judges are really “activists judges”?

All evangelical churches exist to proselytize, and due to the diminished interest in religion, many people who don’t want to hear what the Bible has to say are offended.  And that will enable them to have the opportunity to lodge a complaint.  Then the complainant has no legal expenses, but the defendant might have some hefty legal bills.

You have set Canada on a path that is vastly different from what freedoms we have had in the past.  This is not merely disappointing, it is highly offensive to us.  Would this now be grounds for us lodging a complaint against the judges of the Supreme Court because we are deeply offended?

You are playing alarmingly loose with our freedoms.

~ Leonard Remple

RoadKill Radio: Canada Loses Its Free Speech!

 Comments Off on RoadKill Radio: Canada Loses Its Free Speech!
Mar 052013
 

A livid Kari Simpson and Ron Gray speak with Bill Whatcott about the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision against him, a decision rife with contradictions, perverted logic, and outright lies, a decision that officially suppresses Free Speech in Canada! How could this have happened? Well, obviously, Canadians have been asleep at the switch! If they don't fight to regain their rights, they deserve to lose them.

Drive For Justice 32: $10,000 Reward Offered!

 Comments Off on Drive For Justice 32: $10,000 Reward Offered!
Mar 042013
 

Ron Gray presents your chance to make $10,000! Merely prove that Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and the Supreme Court of Canada did not lie when they officially pronounced that Kari Simpson was involved in opposing the infamous "Surrey Three Books", a key element in their corrupt decision endorsing Rafe Mair's lies and defamation of Kari Simpson. The Supreme Court's LIE has been repeated ad nauseam throughout the Internet, TV, radio, books, newspapers, and law school curriculum ever since. Every source that repeats this LIE is guilty of LYING.

Road Warrior of the Week: Bill Whatcott

 Comments Off on Road Warrior of the Week: Bill Whatcott
Mar 032013
 

In a landmark unanimous/split decision by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Supremes found for Mr. Whatcott on 2 counts, yet against him on another 2 counts of alleged hate speech. Their official decision is rife with lies and contradictions, so Mr. Whatcott is vowing to ignore their corrupt decision and carry on with his crusade to protect Canadians from rampant Christian-bashing, politically correct suppression of the truth, and the willful spread of decadence and disease in our society. If enough of us don’t join him soon, we’ll have no free speech left at all! Read the LifeSiteNews article.

Click Here to Download Bill Whatcott’s Response to the SCC

RKR News: Sex and Government

 Comments Off on RKR News: Sex and Government
Feb 272013
 

Three stories popped up in this week’s headlines that all have to do with governments trying to legislate sex, more or less. Whether it’s forcing gay-straight alliances into religious schools, deciding if Canadians can express their religious beliefs about sodomy, or taking measures to keep so-called gay propaganda out of the reach of children, governments are certainly not shying away from imposing their opinions about sex on the public. Read on…

Manitoba’s anti-bullying law opposed by religious schools

Some Manitoba religious schools say the government is infringing on their religious freedoms with its new anti-bullying law.

About 1,000 staff, students and parents met Sunday night in the gymnasium at Steinbach Christian High School for an information and prayer event regarding Bill 18.

A clause in the bill concerns some religious educators and school communities because it would force schools to accommodate students who want to start specific anti-bullying clubs, including gay-straight alliances. Read more here.

Supreme Court set to update legal definition of hate-speech in first ruling of Internet age

Canada’s controversial 20-year-old legal definition of hatred is set to be updated or even overturned on Wednesday, as the Supreme Court of Canada rules in the case of William Whatcott, a born-again anti-gay pamphleteer who ran afoul of Saskatchewan’s Human Rights Code.

Pitting freedom of religion and speech against a legal regime that bans the repeated public expression of hate, the Whatcott case could see the legal foundation of several anti-hate laws crumble, including Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Read more here.

Russia’s Foreign Minister Defends Anti-Gay Bill

Russia’s foreign minister on Tuesday rejected criticism from the Dutch government and the European Union about proposed legislation that would outlaw “homosexual propaganda.”

Responding to Dutch assertions that the legislation may be contrary to Russia’s international obligations, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said there were no such obligations.

“We don’t have a single international or common European commitment to allow propaganda of homosexuality,” he said. Read more here.

Sun Media’s Bonokoski got it All Wrong on MPs’ Call for Homicide Investigation

 Comments Off on Sun Media’s Bonokoski got it All Wrong on MPs’ Call for Homicide Investigation
Feb 232013
 

by Faye Sonier (LifeSiteNews.com) – In Saturday’s Bushwhackers embarrass PM piece, Sun Media’s National Editorial Writer Mark Bonokoski proves that you don’t need facts to write an opinion article.

He labels three Members of Parliament, Maurice Vellacott, Leon Benoit and Wladyslaw Lizon “obviously stupid bushwhackers” for having asked the RCMP to investigate late-term abortions as homicides. Had they done so, I would have been the first to tell them that their efforts were a waste of time given the state of the law in Canada. Abortion is legal through all nine months of pregnancy in our fair country.

But that’s not what they did. The MPs asked the RCMP to investigate 491 cases of possible homicide. Between 2000 and 2009, 491 newborns survived attempted abortions and subsequently died after birth. We don’t know how they died, but they did. According to the Criminal Code, the same one Bonokoski alludes to reading, when human beings are born they are considered human beings in law. And when human beings are killed or neglected to death, we expect the police to investigate.

The MPs didn’t hide their motives or the language of their request. They clearly set out both in the letter they sent the RCMP, which was posted on Mr.  Vellacott’s website and recirculated widely. All Bonokoski had to do was read it.

Bonokoski then attempts to summarize the decision by which Supreme Court of Canada decriminalized abortion. Unfortunately, it appears as though he didn’t read that either.   The Court said the existing abortion legislation was unconstitutional, and Parliament was free to pass abortion legislation that would be. They even offered suggestions as to language for constitutionally acceptable legislation. Parliament just hasn’t done so.  There is, in fact, no constitutional right to abort your child in Canada. Joyce Arthur of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada even admits to that.

Lastly, he argued that since he doesn’t have a uterus, he cannot form an opinion on abortion and that this position isn’t a cop-out, but a fact. He’s wrong. It’s a total cop-out.

I’m not a woman who has suffered abuse, but I have an opinion on domestic abuse. I’m not a man, but I have an opinion on funding for prostate cancer research. I’m not a slave, but I have an opinion on human trafficking.  I’m not a soldier or live in a war zone, but I have an opinion on Canadian military engagement. I’m not an Aboriginal person, but I have an opinion on the Idle No More movement.

Perhaps he believes that he must have first-hand knowledge of every human experience before he can form an opinion, but this seems like an odd, if not impossible, position for a national media editor to take.  And I can assure him that the rest of the society doesn’t function that way.  We form opinions and vote accordingly, even though we haven’t walked a mile in every Canadian’s shoes.

Bonokoski, a senior media personality, formed and shared outrageous opinions on the actions of three MPs and Canadian abortion law seemingly without having read the MPs’ request to the RCMP, the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code or the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision on abortion. Who says you need to do research and rely on facts to write an opinion piece?

Faye Sonier is Legal Counsel for the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. She blogs at ActivateCFPL.

Drive For Justice 31: The Birth of RoadKill Radio

 Comments Off on Drive For Justice 31: The Birth of RoadKill Radio
Feb 182013
 

RoadKill Radio's "Drive For Justice" host Ron Gray reveals the genesis of the name "RoadKill Radio", and shows that sometimes Good Things can come from Canada's corrupted court system.

Galganov: 250,000 Reasons NOT to Fight for Freedom… One Reason FOR

 Comments Off on Galganov: 250,000 Reasons NOT to Fight for Freedom… One Reason FOR
Feb 132013
 

If you’re an American reading this . . . try to imagine being punished to the tune of A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS – ONLY for refusing to use a language other than English on your own PRIVATE commercial sign . . . by standing up to say NO.

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION . . . WITH THE COURT’S PERMISSION THAT IS:

Over the past few years, with some financial help from a number of people who visit Galganov.com, with just a very few individuals with somewhat deeper pockets, and about fifty or so working-class and retired grass-roots folk who are part of a RIGHTS organization, we did our best to cover the cost of a very basic fight to preserve our MOST fundamental Freedom, which is FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.

When I say that we did our best . . . I really mean that we did our best.

By the time the dust settled, between how much money I put-in, and what others contributed, we spent well MORE than $100,000 in a case against an insignificant Township to preserve our FREEDOM of EXPRESSION.

IN A NUTSHELL . . . a miniscule number of French Language Activists located just East of the City of Ottawa (Canada), in a Township called Russell, in collusion with an English speaking politically motivated LEFTIST Mayor, and two French speakers on his Council, passed a bylaw FORCING merchants to use FRENCH on their signs alongside English, whether the Merchants wanted to or not.

NO GUARANTEE TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN CANADA:

Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, according to Section 2b, which GUARANTEES Freedom of Expression . . . DOESN’T REALLY GUARANTEE ANYTHING. It’s a sham.

What happened in the Russell FORCED Bilingual Sign Law Case is equivalent to saying that the FIRST AMENDMENT in the American Constitution is open to Judicial interpretation on when and where the English language can be used.

THINK SPANISH AND WHAT YOUR POLITICIANS WILL BE WILLING TO SELL FOR VOTES:

I’m not writing about screaming fire in a crowded movie theater. Nor am I writing about using words to defame someone.

What I’m writing about . . . is being FORCED by the government, in this case a lowly Township, to use a language not of your own choosing, in spite of your own objections, on your own PRIVATE commercial sign (property).

There’s no debate or argument over the message of the sign . . . IT’S ONLY ABOUT THE LANGUAGE.

THIS IS NOTHING LESS THAN LINGUISTIC AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ON STEROIDS:

According to this sign-law, I am breaking the law in this community (as well as three others with similar laws) if I put up a sign that does not carry the English message in French . . . same size same message.

Therefore . . . the government is ORDERING private citizens to express themselves in ways that are AGAINST THEIR OWN FREE WILL.

BUT THERE’S MORE TO IT THAN THAT . . .

Because of French Language Activism in Canada, there is a loophole in our Constitution that allows special accommodation to the French language . . . that includes ABROGATING the Constitutional RIGHTS of English speakers.

YOU READ THAT RIGHT . . . If it favors French Speakers, English Speaker’s RIGHTS do not count; meaning that for Anglos, there is no Constitutional Guarantee to Freedom of Expression when French becomes a factor.

THE DEMOGRAPHICS ILLUSTRATE TYRANNY OF THE MINORITY:

In all of Canada, excluding the French Separatist and linguistic racist ethnocentric Province of Quebec, there are ONLY 3% of the population who consider themselves to be French Speakers.

But, unless you can pass a French proficiency exam, which just about all Anglos CANNOT, it is nearly impossible to get a job working anywhere in the country for the federal government.

How’s that for linguistic discrimination at the hands of a 3% minority?

Ontario is about 4% French. And of those 4%, most of them live in small French communities scattered throughout the province, with a preponderance living within an hour of the National Capital (Ottawa), and the border to the Ethnocentric English-Hating French Province of Quebec, where the unrestricted use of the English language is AGAINST the law.

And of that 4% – just about 100% speak English . . . so why the problem?

Because a small town Mayor (Ken Hill) with political dreams of grandeur decided to pass a bylaw usurping the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, for no purpose other than to make a few French TRIBALISTS feel good about themselves, and possibly give himself the French vote in a larger political context, the Court Costs awarded AGAINST me are $250,000 because we lost.

BUT HOW CAN ANYONE LOSE FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION?

These costs include our first loss at Superior Court, where the self-declared French Activist Judge Monique Metivier said in Court; that even though the Russell Bylaw violated Freedom of Expression, it was the RIGHT THING TO DO.

The cost also included the THREE Judges of the Ontario Court of Appeal who said the same thing. IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

And then there’s the cost for the Activist Supreme Court of Canada, which refused to hear our APPEAL, even though this bylaw and various other challenges we made to the Supreme Court in our request for LEAVE, actually violated their own jurisprudence.

Even though all the Judges agreed that it was the RIGHT THING TO DO, not one of them said why and how it’s supported by the Constitution . . . And here is where it gets really serious:

CANADA HAS A NEW LANGUAGE LAW . . . AND NO ONE KNOWS IT:

Because the Supreme Court refused to hear our appeal . . . this linguistically racist bylaw against the English majority in just one community, introduced by a pissant mayor and council, all of whom were defeated in the follow-up election . . . IS NOW THE LAW OF CANADA.

WHERE WAS THE MEDIA?

Canada’s media can teach LEFTIST journalism to most American News Providers. How scary is that?

If any issue casts a shadow of doubt on the BIG CANADIAN LIE, that Canada is a bilingual country, which is as far removed from the truth as you can possibly get, the Canadian media stays as far away from it as they can . . . as if it was the plague.

I used the headline – 250,000 REASONS NOT TO FIGHT FOR FREEDOM, because it’s true.

Ask yourself this . . . Why would anyone want to fight a battle for the FREEDOM of some thirty-three million people who are lost in a fog, and wouldn’t so much as lift a finger to defend themselves or contribute to their own defense?

FOR ME – THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE . . . Even though there were 250,000 reasons for me NOT to have done this, there is only one reason that I did.

IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR FREEDOM.

Young men and women . . . and not so young men and women have fought, and are still fighting all over this planet for the FREEDOMS of others, while in our own countries (the USA and Canada), people take our FREEDOMS for granted.

We allow our politicians, nameless and faceless bureaucrats, and ACTIVIST JUDGES to nibble away at our FREEDOMS everyday, as if our FREEDOMS are mere suggestions opposed to ironclad guarantees.

I TOOK A $250,000 BEATING – BUT I DIDN’T DIE. AND I WASN’T WOUNDED.

My father, as a young Canadian landed on the shores of Sicily, before the D-DAY Invasion. He was wounded at the Battle of Casino, but fought-on nonetheless. He was decorated and mentioned in dispatches many times. And was awarded the Bronze Lion by her Majesty Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands FOR BRAVERY ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY.

My dad fought in Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Germany. And like MILLIONS of brave soldiers who fought all over the world so the world could be FREE, he did it not because he was forced to, and not because there was some kind of reward at the end of the war . . . BUT BECAUSE IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

How do you compare living under the daily threat of mutilation or death in war, to being whacked for a Quarter of Million Dollars by lawyers who profit in the DEATH of Constitutional FREEDOMS?

THERE IS NO COMPARISON . . . And like my dad who fought-on with a bandaged shrapnel wound to his head at Monte Casino . . . I DON’T QUIT EITHER.

It is obvious that we cannot win in the Courts, where Freedom is what the Judges have decided Freedom should be. But, WE CAN WIN IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION, where Freedom MUST be more than just a suggestion.

Whether you’re a Canadian or an American . . . you have a duty to yourself and to your country to get into the fight. Because, if you accept that your Freedoms should be open to the interpretation of the government and Courts, then you don’t deserve to enjoy the FREEDOMS other people bled and died for you to have.

I DON’T HAVE $250,000 . . . And this loss is not without real personal consequences for me. But I would do it all over again. ACTUALLY, I have no intention whatsoever of slowing down, let alone stopping, and not just about language.

If ONE FREEDOM is under attack . . . all of our FREEDOMS are under attack, and I will not stand silent or passive. To the LEFT, the RIGHTS of Government over the RIGHTS of the INDIVIDUAL have long been an International Conspiracy.

OUR GLOBAL DEFENSE FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AND LIBERTIES MUST BE NO LESS.

So, when I ask visitors to Galganov.com from time to time to help out financially, you can now see why.

And if I care enough about all of our FREEDOMS to have laid my fiscal life on the line, the least people can do who enjoy reading my editorials is care a bit too.

The mark of success is not in winning, since winning can be defined in a million ways.

REAL SUCCESS . . . is fighting against a much greater foe knowing that you probably won’t win, but getting into the fight nonetheless, because it is the right thing to do. And no matter how much of a pounding you take . . .

YOU NEVER GIVE UP – AND YOU NEVER STOP . . . NO MATTER HOW TOUGH IT GETS.

Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov

Drive For Justice 28: Back to the Supreme Court of Canada

 1 Response »
Jan 212013
 

Ron Gray explains the rare circumstances that allow an appeal to a Supreme Court of Canada decision. Among the circumstances are if significant evidence was missed in the trial, and if justice was thwarted by or in the High Court. Both these circumstances exist in this case, and to ignore the proof would be to compound the injustice even further. Does Canada's highest court have the integrity to correct its own errors, or will they have to be forced by Parliamentary intervention to obey the law?

 Older Entries