Road Warrior of the Week

Heroes and Good Samaritans

May 142013
 

March against Monsanto and for your right to know what you and your family are eating! Joseph Roberts, Senior Editor and Publisher of Common Ground, and activist Christen Traversy join Ron and Kari to talk about the growing mobilization of informed citizens demanding that the Harper government stop jeopardizing the health of Canadians by pandering to their political bankers/backers, and to require the labelling of GMO manufactured foods. The Vancouver March against Monsanto takes place May 25, 2013 at 11:00 am, get there by 10:30 and meet outside the Vancouver Art Gallery. You need to get involved. Your health depends on it!

Mar 062013
 

Every family and child throughout Canada is vulnerable to the agency’s authority. Poor parents and children are at even greater risk. The Children’s Aid Society (also known as Family and Children’s Services and Ministry of Child and Family Development) can remove a child from a home, with or without a reason. While the law requires the agency to obtain a warrant for an apprehension, they rarely do – and they get away with it in court. This behaviour encourages malicious behaviour from teachers and principals, neighbours, adversaries, and health-care providers to use the agency as a weapon to avenge a personal vendetta – one of the most common reasons the agency is called. A parent best be careful not to swear at the principal, challenge a child’s teacher, argue with a malicious neighbour, or irritate a medical professional at the hospital – because the odds are against them. All it takes is a phone call. No warrant required.

View the entire documentary at blakout.ca

Mar 012013
 

Ron Gray reviews Russia's recent series of initiatives to help keep homosexual propaganda away from their youth. Never to be accused of religious bias, our old Cold War enemy seems to have developed a healthy respect for the health risks commonly associated with gay sex. Their move is not anti-gay – they recently decriminalized homosexual activity – but a protective move to save impressionable youth. Too bad there aren't more governments that care this much for their next generation.

Feb 102013
 

Jerry Flynn is a retired officer of the Royal Canadian Navy, but he continues to serve and protect his fellow Canadians by lecturing about the very serious dangers of Smart Meter technology. Flynn should know; he was an expert for Canada in wireless technology as a weapon for 22 years. The utility and appliance companies who are involved know the dangers, too, as well as the Canadian government, but it seems that profit is more important to them than the health and lives of millions of Canadians.

Feb 072013
 

We would warn “Don’t try this at home,” but that would defeat the purpose. As this video strongly urges, hire an experienced electrician to perform this task. Smart Meters are not approved by UL (Underwriters Laboratories) or CSA (Canadian Standards Association). They are not safe. If they burn your house down, the utility company is not liable. Smart meters spy on you, cause health problems, and have been forced on the public without proper study, safeguards, or due process. Smart meter parts are made in China and assembled in the United States, sending your tax dollars to foreign pockets rather than back into the Canadian economy.

You have the right to remove smart meters from your property as long as you follow the proper protocol. Watch this video and learn how to fight back! It’s never too late.

Plan B: Surround the smart meter with Magnetic Shielding Material (much more efective than aluminum foil).

Also see these two documents published by the Santa Cruz County, California, Health Services Agency, confirming that smart meters have not proven to be safe, and recommending a moratorium on their use:

http://emfsafetynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Health-Risks-Associated-With-SmartMeters.pdf

http://sccounty01.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/bds/Govstream/BDSvData/non_legacy/agendas/2012/20120124/PDF/041.pdf

Jan 272013
 

LIFESITENEWS.COM

This is an appeal to conscience, human decency, and humanity. Please confront the responsibility to read this through. I would appreciate a response explaining the World Health Organization’s counsel in the following matter.

I am apprised of your recent manual on the “best way to kill unborn babies”.

This is not the organization’s categorization yet terminology does not change objective reality.

Like Hitler, you sanitize language to cover up crimes against humanity. With the advancements made in ultrasound technology in this last 20 year period, the question of whether or not the “fetus” is a human being from the very first moment of conception has been radically resolved for persons of right functioning conscience. Yet, like Hitler, you hide the evidence from the world and from your heart.

The Third Reich, too, continually came up with new and more efficient ways to get the job done.

Apart from the radical issue of conscience and objective morality, it is incomprehensible, with all of the evidence of the demolition on every level to a woman’s health caused by abortion physically, mentally, and psychologically, that you would recklessly continue to recommend abortion as a health option in entire disregard for a woman’s health.

When is the madness going to end.

A “health” organization has a grave responsibility to offer only the best of health standards and counsel. Women deserve better. A “health” organization cannot justify crimes against humanity. This is beyond appalling and the extermination of human life has superceded Hitler’s crimes against humanity to incomprehensible proportions. 1.5 million lives ended annually each year in the United States alone since 1973.

WHO are you? What are you? What have you become?

In defense of all women and in memory of my grandparents exterminated in Auschwitz Concentration Camp, I urge you to live up to your responsibility to humanity and to your name.

I urge your hearts and minds to confront the atrocities and end the deadening and rationalizations of your consciences.

I urge you to confront the reality of your “health” counsel.

Nothing, absolutely nothing can justify your recommendations or your standards.

Oct 042012
 

Mark Hasiuk asks why the government of British Columbia is so upset that approximately half of the province's health care workers are refusing to get flu shots. Is it that health care workers don't fall so easily for the rhetoric and lies that push these drugs on an unsuspecting population? Is the general public aware of the dangers of these unnecessary flu shots, and their relative ineffectiveness? Are they aware that the government and makers of these vaccines are not liable for the damages you may experience? Are they aware of the ingredients of these vaccines, and that some are considered poisonous and life-threatening to children?

Sep 302012
 


A Lying, Left-wing Loony Teacher, Debating the Non-debatable, Health Workers Reject the Inject, Abortion is Murder, and a Gaggle of Subversive Liars

Daily at 7:30 pm Eastern

Monday, October 1, 2012
Drive For Justice 16: The Players, Pt. 3 – Is James Chamberlain a Left-Wing Loony Liar? Yes.

Ron Gray explores the latest character in the “Drive For Justice” series – one decidedly lacking in character and professionalism. Rafe Mair lied repeatedly about the true facts associated with this unprofessional goof of a teacher while vilifying Kari Simpson for supporting a parent who refused to allow her young son to be indoctrinated with this teacher’s version of left-wing propaganda. Instead of telling listeners about James Chamberlain’s lies and abuse of his role as a teacher, Rafe Mair falsely accused Kari of supporting the parents simply because this teacher was “gay”. Pay attention Rafe Mair! Oh wait! You already know all this, you just choose to continue to lie and shamefully hide behind the skirts of not-so-law-abiding judges.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012
RoadKill Radio News: Debating the Non-Debatable! Parliament Reluctantly Begins the Abortion Discussion

Kari Simpson and Ron Gray speak with Don Hutchinson, vice president and general legal counsel of the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. Mr. Hutchinson discusses the recent defeat (91 yeas v. 203 nays) of Motion 312. Motion 312 called for review of the outdated 400 year-old law and sought to strike a special Parliamentary committee to review the medical and scientific facts now known about the origins of human life. Clearly a great number of Liberals and New Democrats fear the truth – apparently the world is still flat for them, and regrettably it seems for our Prime Minister and some other Conservative members as well.

Thursday, October 4, 2012
The Mark Hasiuk Show: Half of BC Health Workers Reject the Inject

Mark Hasiuk asks why the government of British Columbia is so upset that approximately half of the province’s health care workers are refusing to get flu shots. Is it that health care workers don’t fall so easily for the rhetoric and lies that push these drugs on an unsuspecting population? Is the general public aware of the dangers of these unnecessary flu shots, and their relative ineffectiveness? Are they aware that the government and makers of these vaccines are not liable for the damages you may experience? Are they aware of the ingredients of these vaccines, and that some are considered poisonous and life-threatening to children?

Friday, October 5, 2012
Culture Guard: Seeing Is Believing – Abortion is Murder

Kari Simpson speaks with Jonathon Van Maren of the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform. Mr. Van Maren’s organization has engaged in a long-term campaign to inform the public about the true facts of abortion and the killing of innocent human babies. Hundreds of thousands of babies each year, murdered because they are “inconvenient” while hundreds of thousands of childless couples would cherish raising these children. While many proclaim that this Canadian Holocaust is a “woman’s right”, growing numbers are seeing this senseless slaughter for what it is.

Saturday, October 6, 2012
Family Freedom Fighters: Why the BCTF is a Gaggle of Subversive Liars

Ron Gray once again clearly points out the subversive agenda of the British Columbia Teachers Federation, a union dedicating much of its resources to the deconstruction of family values, morality, and tradition. As the number of enrolled students drops in BC’s public school system (wary parents are running!), the BCTF continues to impose its culturally destructive agenda on the children of the remaining oblivious parents.

Mar 232012
 

Dear Friends, I, like you, dislike taxes….. Yet I come before you today to propose… a new tax! This humble, modest proposal of a tax is not a ‘Head’ tax upon mere phallacies of human effort. Nay, nay, this is a new ‘Sin Tax’.

As Canadians, we’re a tolerant bunch. We’ve embraced the right of individuals to indulge in behaviours and activities that are known to do personal harm… indulgences that include the consumption of spirited drinks, inhalation of known carcinogens—some of which are wrapped in designer paper, engineered to smoulder with pretty orangy-red tipped colours that resemble a magnificent, romantic Canadian sunset.

And. We. TAX THEM.

We also still allow Canadians, like me, to drive non-electric cars here in BC—as long as we pay a bizarre Carbon-Footprint-SIN tax.  Yes a SIN tax – because driving a SUV—just like drinking and smoking—is immoral and is an unethical assault on our own COMMUNAL health, and environmental well-being – and I, like you, must pay for my societal crimes.

Being Canadian—a true Canadian—requires balancing responsibility with fairness. I personally never complain about the sin tax that mixes so wonderfully with every sip of red wine I take. I find comfort in knowing those taxes are being used to care for somebody’s diseased liver, a liver that once functioned in a healthy hard-working, sin-tax-loving alcoholic.

I also appreciate the honest and vulgar candour of our legislators, who demand hard, truthful messages like “YOU WILL DIE”—more or less—“if you smoke!”—a message that MUST be pictured on each and every package of cancer sticks sold in Canada…

And then these same truth-loving health warriors pass additional laws to tax the ash off anyone stupid enough to smoke.  This is Brilliant, and this is fair; the more you indulge in sin-taxed activities, the more tax-funded services you have the right to enjoy!

It’s because of this type of reasoned thinking that it only makes sense to tax sex.  Clearly, taxing sex will be the solution to the obscene costs this nation is now required to spend on health-care-related diseases that result directly from unnatural sexual behaviours, promiscuity, and sexual indulgences that are known to cause personal bodily harm.

You see, in our compassionate Canadian civility, we know we must cater to the right of others to indulge in their individual AND GROUP vices—and for this we should be grateful; I mean, God forbid that we should ever require individuals to be responsible for their own behaviour! That would be so-o-o totally unCanadian.

But, while we won’t dictate sexual behaviour, we all MUST recognize that there are costs associated with the aforementioned practices.

The multi-billion dollar industry associated with sexual diversity, anal sex and the promotion of promiscuity—practices we are now brainwashing kids to “celebrate” in public schools—is sucking dry the public purse.

The many sexually-transmitted diseases that result from just ‘gay’ sex for example; the Promiscuous AND ORAL AND ANAL kinds —of which HIV/AIDS is only one example —are draining the public coffins…I mean coffers.  

Other sexually-transmitted diseases typically associated with promiscuity now require vaccine programs for 12 year-olds to be administered as part of the typical school regime – again costing tax-payers hundreds of millions of dollars!

A Sex Sin Tax would be great! It is civil, compassionate, tolerant, diverse and fair. If implemented properly it could result in a tax windfall for the government…that’s us!

Think about the revenues that would be generated if there was a 20% additional sales tax on the sale of pornography and all those escort and full body massage ads.  As for those websites that facilitate a find somebody to boink now, gps driven casual-sex encounters that stimulate the proliferation of casual sex and STDs—BANG!—hit them with a 40% tax on their service and their advertisers! If these same sites encourage anal sex or other acts that provably further adversely affect our beloved health care system, well whomp them with a 60% tax!

For those parents that want their children screwing around like horny Bonobos —well, let them pay for the Gardisol vaccine that may kill their daughters, for their daughters’ birth control pills, and for their sons’ condoms for that matter—and they can pay the new sin tax of 35% on all those products!

This new Love-Tax-Cum-Sin-Tax will help fund the billions of dollars spent annually on health-care-related COSTS to SERVICE a SMALL SEXshun of Canada’s population. 

As for taxing individuals who engage in these costly activities, the only real challenge we face is: where to stick the meter?

I’m Kari Simpson, and this is my solution to an important and costly social reality.

Now do your own research!

 

http://www.dawnstefanowicz.org/medicalconsequence.htm

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0075.html

 

 

Mar 152012
 

Was Marc Emery sold out by the Vancouver Police Department and turned over to a foreign country for allegedly breaking that foreign county’s laws while never leaving Canada? He is currently serving a 5-year jail sentence in the U.S. for – as the DEA admits – political activism promoting the legalization of pot.

Mark Hasiuk interviews Jodie Emery, Marc Emery’s wife, about the current state of cannabis culture in Canada. Prohibition, decriminalization and legalization are covered, as well as the social, economic, and health impacts of pot use.

Mar 132012
 

Kari Simpson and Ron Gray have already made their stand (and built their cages) to fend off the dangerous, intrusive, and frankly illegal Smart Meters. Now listen to Una St. Clair of Citizens For Safe Technology (.org) about the growing grassroots movement to protect our health, our homes, our privacy, our money, and our civil rights.

Smart Meters – made in China, assembled in the U.S. – have not been approved for safety by the Canadian Standards Association or Underwriters Laboratory. Your home insurance probably won’t cover the damage done to your home when your Smart Meter starts a fire, as many already have. Insurance can never recover the health consequences that Smart Meters have been documented to cause. Your electricity bill may triple – or more!

Are you ready to stand up for your rights? Are you ready to protect yourself? Are you ready to get smart and Fight Smart Meters?

Mar 052012
 

Here’s an important question: if teachers are willing to lie to the taxpayers who employ them, are they also willing to lie to the students?

A recent ad by the BC Teachers’ Federation—the teachers’ radical, pro-gay Leftist union—features a purported teacher pleading: “What we’re asking for is what students need.”

Really? Let’s have a look at some of the things they’re asking for:

• “Compassionate leave” for teachers when a friend dies. How does that benefit students? Cost to taxpayers: $80 million.

• A 22% pay raise at a time when governments are fighting deficits and debts that the students will have to repay in higher taxes when they graduate—if they can find a job in the socialist-crippled economy they’ll inherit. Benefit to teachers: a top pay rate that jumps from $74,353 to $90,944 a year . Cost: $618 million.

• Up to 26 weeks of fully paid leave per year to provide direct or indirect compassionate care to any person. Cost to taxpayers: $49 million a year.

• Eight days off a year whenever a teacher wants. $122 million a year.

• Topping up parental and maternity leave to allow up to 5 years of leave per child. Cost to taxpayers: $41 million a year.

• Five more days off for professional development, at teacher’s discretion: $80 million.

• Up to five days off a year to care for their child—or any other person: $80 million.

• Unlimited leave for union business. Who knows what that will cost?

• Benefit upgrades—taxpayers will pick up the full tab for MSP, extended health and dental, applying to all teachers: $82 million.

• taxpayer pays all professional fees: about $5 million a year.

• Improvements to On Call pay, including $2,200 per month whether they work or not. Cost to taxpayers: $60 million.

• Retirement bonus of 5% a year to any teacher with 10 years or more service at age 55. Total cost to taxpayers: $445 million.

The $2.184 billion price tag is actually only part of what BCTF demands would cost. Many other provincial government bargaining agreements have a “me-too” clause: if BC breaks its net-zero wage mandate, every other union will be able to use that “whipsaw” to renegotiate their contract to try for more.

And don’t buy the argument that BC teachers are underpaid compared to other provinces. Look at the facts:
The BCTF claim of “tumbling from third place to eighth” is inaccurate and misleading, because those place rankings were arrived at using two differing methods.

An accurate description of BC teachers’ salaries from 2006 to 2011, according to the Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation:

• By one set of criteria, BC teachers ranked 3rd in Canada in 2006, and now rank 4th;

• By the other set of criteria, in 2006, BC teachers’ salaries ranked 6th in Canada, and in 2011 were 7th.

“But it’s for the children,” pleads the BCTF ad.

I think it’s a crock…

Feb 272012
 

NEWS RELEASE from Culture Guard

Feb. 27, 2012

For immediate release

Citizens’ rights advocate threatens education ministry with human rights case over ‘slurs’

VICTORIA, Feb. 27, 2012 (CultureGuard) — A citizens’ rights advocacy group, Culture Guard, has asked Education Minister George Abbott to ban words it says demean and incite hatred against students, parents and other stakeholders who oppose having the homosexual political agenda propagandized in schools.

The offensive words include “homophobia”, “homophobe”, “homophobic” and “heterosexist”.

“The words are just made-up propaganda words,” says Culture Guard president Kari Simpson. “They may sound pseudo-medical or pseudo-psychological, but they aren’t found in any recognized medical, psychological or psychiatric dictionaries.

“Their only purpose is propaganda: once the sex activists hang a hateful label on parents or others who don’t want children brainwashed in school, they can more easily persuade the public, the media, and politicians not to listen to fact-based arguments for protecting students from political propaganda.”

In a letter to Abbott, Mrs. Simpson cites the up-coming “Pink Shirt Day”, which will be observed in many BC schools, as an ideal time for the minister to ban the use of such “bully” words in official documents and programs.

“Failure to stand against this anti-democratic strategy, which denies civil Canadians rights that are explicitly protected within the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, will result in a complaint to the BC Human Rights Tribunal,” her letter states.

Simpson notes that many homosexual practices are provable vectors for diseases which are at epidemic proportions among homosexuals, and which cost the public billions of dollars—but are “100% preventable” by behaviour change.

Under the guise of “anti-bullying”, sex activist campaigns seek to “celebrate” in schools (quoting a recent BCTF graphic, handed out at a conference where teachers were coached on how to implement the “teachers’ guide” Making Space)

One example cited was a report published by a provincially-funded community health organization that serve Vancouver’s homosexual community, which stated that throat cancer caused by sexual practices common among homosexual men is now a greater threat than lung cancer from smoking.

Another web-site funded by the government gives kids “how-to” information on “fisting”—a physically dangerous practice common among homosexuals. And her letter stated that a pro-gay, Drag Queen sex activist who “sponsors” a northern BC school’s “Gay-Straight Alliance” club gave the same kind of information to students.

=30=

contact: Kari Simpson

phone:        (694) 514-1614

e-mail:         RKRNews@gmail.com

Correspondence to the Hon. George Abbott follows.

Culture Guard

Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Fax: 604 514-1669

 

The Hon. George Abbott

Minister of Education

Room 310

Parliament Buildings

Victoria, BC V8V 1X4

VIA FACSIMILE:    250 387-3200

February 27, 2012

Re:    Eradication of the Slurs: Homophobe, Homophobia, Homophobic, Heterosexism, Heterosexist

Attention Mr. Minister:

The opportunity is before us to make “Pink Shirt Day” truly meaningful—to convince students to end the use of all slurs, including hateful, harmful, and demeaning “bully” words like “homophobe”, “homophobia”, “homophobic” and “heterosexist”—which are all invented propaganda words. Although they sound pseudo-medical and pseudo-psychological, they are not to be found in any recognized medical, psychological or psychiatric dictionaries.

As you are aware, words like these are verbal weapons, used by some radical teachers and sex activists against students or their parents (and others) who hold constitutionally-protected views and opinions about homosexuality, sexual promiscuity and other defined or yet-to-be-defined sexual identities. These words are typically used by sex activists to demean and promote contempt for those who seek to have a mature, informed and long-overdue discussion about the growing and costly implications—to both our health-care and to our social services—associated with homosexuality and sexual promiscuity.

It is long past time to eradicate the use of such contemptuous labels. And when official documents and/or statements make use of them, it gives official sanction to a fascist strategy of co-opting authority to silence dissenting opinions.

Failure to stand against this anti-democratic strategy, which denies civil Canadians rights that are explicitly protected within the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, will result in a complaint to the BC Human Rights Tribunal.

I trust you are aware of the growing and troubling numbers, among those 25 years of age and under, relating to transmission and proliferation of sexually-transmitted diseases. As Education Minister, you have a duty to inform students, for their protection, about the serious implications and costs to health and social services that are a direct result of dangerous and unhealthy sexual practices. I, like most Canadians, support the right of others to engage in relationships of their choosing; but the factual reality is that some of these practices are now costing me, and other Canadians, billions upon billions of dollars in health-care and other related costs. This is where it becomes my business, and that of other Canadians, to start questioning the irresponsible behaviours of individuals that are over-burdening our social services. It is also where I and other Canadians, including our elected representatives, must look critically at the purveyors of false and/or misleading information, and how this propaganda is spreading through our civil society and contributing to goals contrary to those mandated by the School Act, specifically:

WHEREAS it is the goal of a democratic society to ensure that all its members receive an education that enables them to become literate, personally fulfilled and publicly useful, thereby increasing the strength and contributions to the health and stability of that society;

AND WHEREAS the purpose of the British Columbia school system is to enable all learners to become literate, to develop their individual potential and to acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to contribute to a healthy, democratic and pluralistic society and a prosperous and sustainable economy;

. [Emphases mine]

I was recently engaged in an exchange of correspondence with a man who has contracted AIDS. This individual’s sexual practices included sodomy. I trust you are aware, as BC’s Education Minister, that in Canada, the category of men having sex with men (“MSM”) is vastly over-represented in the new infection statistics from the Centres for Disease Control. MSM is, in fact, the primary vector in North America for a number of costly sexually transmitted diseases.

This individual, in addition to all the medical costs to tax-payers related to his treatment, is also collecting two government pensions, including a federal disability pension. He is also receiving a government subsidy for housing because of his 100% preventable disease. He likes to live comfortably, so one of his recent accommodations costs $1,800.00 per month. He shares this with his “buddy”—another man collecting the same pensions, due to his own AIDS status. He also advised me that he expects hard-working Canadians to pay for “all his expenses.”

I trust that, as Education Minister, you are aware that among the homosexual male population, throat cancer caused by common practices among that group is now more likely than cancer caused by smoking! Here is one warning that a provincially-funded community health organization called Health Initiative for Men, which, in addition to creating hard-core homosexual porn with tax-payers’ money, also provides health advice to homosexual men, the caution states:

Too Much of A Good Thing Can Make You Sick

The ‘good thing’ in this case being oral sex. Yes boys, a new research finding has officially stated that giving too much head is more likely to cause throat cancer than smoking! Stating the obvious; we love giving our partner’s penis and ass some loving, perhaps more so than our straight counterparts, and with more ‘partners’ at that. This means then that the gay population is at higher risk of getting throat cancer, especially when you consider the fact that the more people you perform oral sex on, the greater the odds of you contracting an oral infection which leads to the cancer.

Then we have the provincially funded youth resource “Planet Ahead” which, aided by “Luci Lubricant” and “Condom man”, is invited into schools to alter/form the “values” of 12-15 year olds. Like government-funded Planned Parenthood (which changed its name to Options for Sexual Health after the link between Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, and Adolf Hitler was exposed, along with her racist advocacy of “eliminating weeds from the human garden”), these groups promote to students the liberty to freely “express themselves” in any sexual manner they wish.

“Won’t get Weird”, a youth-oriented web-site funded in part by we tax-payers, and operated by Options for Sexual Health/Planned Parenthood, gives kids “important” information, such as “giving blow jobs with braces on”, while making mock of parents.

Another government funded site called “Spiderbytes” gives information to teenagers on “fisting”—how-to, etc. This information on fisting parallels information given to a Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) club at a public school in northern BC by its “drag queen” sponsor.

One alarming aspect of all this sex talk is that the reality of the financial costs and health hazards associated with irresponsible and unnatural sexual conduct and/or behaviours is utterly absent from the discussion—and there is no opportunity for debate. It’s all one-sided propaganda… and lies.

Respected BC Court of Appeal judge, Justice Mary Southin, addressing the issues of promoting homosexuality in the public education system, wrote:

When there is a sea-change in the accepted wisdom of a society, those who have adhered to the attitudes of the past, what I call the “old wisdom”, in a very short space of time may find themselves denigrated by adherents of the “new wisdom”.

The slurs used by adherents of the so-called “new wisdom” have been shown to be factually foolish; what is more, they wilfully endanger the health and well-being of our children and youth. Further, the monetary costs to our society by “celebrating” medically unsafe sexual practices are prohibitive.

Defaming and denigrating those whose wisdom and insight has stood the test of time—and continues, provably, to do so—must not be tolerated. As Minister of Education, you will also be culpable for promoting hate and contempt, if you tolerate your subordinates embedding the language of hate within Ministry of Education statements and policies.  These slurs of hostility and belittlement, designed to silence anyone who would dare to initiate pertinent, fact-based discussion of important and serious matters relating to sexual practices, must cease.

Here is one of many ironic examples: in the Ministry of Education’s Safe Caring and Orderly Schools directive, schools are required to incorporate a number of policies and practices designed to “protect” all students—i.e., to teach, model and encourage socially responsible behaviours that contribute to the school community, solve problems in peaceful ways, value diversity, defend human rights, and assume responsibility, in partnership with the wider community, for resolving critical safety concerns.

This looks like a good directive—until one reads on and sees that your Ministry believes it is OK to single out those who—for religious, cultural, moral, medical and other common-sense motives—want to challenge the propaganda being published within the schools by politically-driven sex-activist teachers. And here’s where your Ministry starts to use demeaning slurs:

…work together to better understand issues such as bullying,

harassment and intimidation, racism, sexism and

homophobia

Linking this invented propaganda/slur to “harassment” and “racism” is a further insult to people whose opposition to homosexual propaganda in the schools is based upon valid medical and economic criteria, and has nothing whatsoever to do with “hate”.

You exacerbate the problem by asserting—as factual—propaganda published by self-identified homosexual and political groups like GALE (now known as Pride Education Network), and by allowing its use as “appropriate resources”. Resources like Challenging Homophobia are political, and incorporate hateful words and slurs designed to bully, demean and silence fact-based opposition to their writers’ political agendas.

Because these materials are so clearly political—in some cases acknowledged as such by their authoring groups—they have absolutely no place within our schools!

I have been appalled at the many examples I now have seen that demonstrate the cultivation of hate within our schools; newly-recruited homosexual “allies” use despicable bullying tactics to target youth, parents and other stakeholders who might dare to demand a factual and truthful account of important issues relating to homosexuality and other aberrant and unsafe sexual practices.

I recently confronted the Chair of the Vancouver School Board with these facts, after witnessing the hatred and contempt demonstrated by some students who made presentations under the guise of “questions” to the Board at two recent meetings. I am delighted to report that Ms. Bacchus subsequently refrained from using the slurs referred to herein, at the next VSB meeting. I have, for your convenience, enclosed a copy of my recent correspondence to Ms. Bacchus.

With the controversial “Pink Shirt Day” fast approaching— controversial because its original agenda of opposing all bullying has been hi-jacked by homosexual activists and the BCTF—I fervently hope you will embrace the true spirit of that day by refraining from using any slurs. Further, I request that you write to me forthwith, affirming your willingness to:

1) Eradicate from the Ministry of Education’s policies and/or directives any use of the slurs referred to herein;

2) Write to all Boards of Education, instructing them to prohibit the use of the said slurs in any policy or program.

I hope this matter can be resolved quickly, as failure to do so will certainly result in a complaint to the BC Human Rights Tribunal. I believe the documented evidence will be overwhelming as to the degree of hatred and contempt being fostered in our schools by allowing these slurs to be treated as “acceptable”. They are not.

I trust that you will act quickly to resolve this troubling situation.  I remain in my willingness to meet with you and brief you on the issues related to the BCTF and the political agenda of sex activists within BC schools.

Yours truly,

Kari D. Simpson

President, Culture Guard

Tel:       604 514-1614

Email:   cultureguard@gmail.com

Enclosed Patti Bacchus letter follows.

Culture Guard

Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Email: cultureguard@gmail.com

Ms. Patti Bacchus

Chairwoman, VSB

1580 West Broadway

Vancouver, BC V6J 5K8

Via Email

February 7, 2012

Re: Hateful & Contemptuous Slurs

Attention Ms. Bacchus:

As you are aware, I attended the last meeting of the Vancouver School Board on January 16, 2012. The meeting was also attended by a number of concerned parents, students and several homosexual activists and homosexual activist teachers: teachers who belong to overtly political groups like Pride Net.

I was disappointed and offended to see you allow hateful and contemptuous slurs being used that night: slurs made by trustees, teachers, students and PAC representatives. The terms “homophobe”, “homophobic” and “homophobia” are well-known hateful words, typically rooted in bigotry or ignorance and used to target, demean and bully into silence and compliance individuals and/or groups opposed to the public dissemination of false and propagandist information related to homosexuality and other allegedly “fluid” sexual determinations.

These same slurs are standard verbal weapons used by sex activists against individuals and/or groups that oppose the “celebration” of medically unsafe sexual practices like sodomy, and other associated sexual practices that are physically harmful and cost individuals their lives and their health—and which heavily burden our tax-funded healthcare system and other social services with obscene costs that are, for the most part, 100% preventable.

The groups targeted by the sex activists include members of the various faith communities (whose beliefs are protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms); medical and mental health professionals; politicians; and informed Canadians—all of whom are increasingly appalled at both the misinformation being disseminated by their public education system, and by the abuse of their tax dollars by individuals who engage in risky and unhealthy sexual practices, and then expect the next generation to pay for the medical and societal expenses associated with the consequences of their sexual behaviour.

As a trustee, Ms. Bacchus, you are duty-bound— by your own policies, and by law—to ensure that an environment without discrimination is cultivated within the Vancouver School District. Your lack of leadership and willful acquiesce to the bully tactics that played out that evening were nothing short of disgraceful; and perhaps only trumped by the ignorance displayed by students who spoke — students who proved only that the VSB has been providing platforms for sex activists who are demonstrably ignorant about issues involving homosexuality; but are well-trained in parroting the talking points and slurs used relentlessly by homosexual and other sex activists. Hardly something to take “pride” in.

I trust tonight’s meeting will be conducted in a more respectful and lawful manner. I believe it would be prudent for you to ensure that hateful slurs like “homophobe”, “homophobic” “homophobia” and “heterosexist” are prohibited. These words create a false impression of medical or psychological authority—but they do not appear in any recognized medical or psychological dictionaries. They are merely propaganda labels used to dismiss legitimate arguments used by opponents of the “gay agenda”. I am requesting that at the outset of tonight’s meeting, you openly declare those terms, and other similar words, to be inappropriate; and that you apologize to those in attendance for having allowed such vile and contemptuous slurs during the last meeting.

Be further advised that I have also asked the Vancouver Police to attend, to protect concerned parents who will be there. At the last VSB meeting, a videographer for Culture Guard was assaulted by one of the pro-sex activists. Your participation, by allowing nonsensical, divisive tactics like the politically-driven censure of Trustees Woo and Denike, fuelled some of the sex activists’ penchant for violence. I trust you will ensure that individuals videotaping the aggressive conduct of sex activist teachers, trustees and VSB facilitators will not have to endure further physical assault. I also trust that you will not give preferential treatment to sex activist teachers like Ms. Dumont, a member of the sex activist political organization Pride Education Network, as you did at the last public meeting. Ms. Dumont’s request not to be video-recorded at a public meeting is at best silly; she is featured on the PrideNet website, picture and all.

I remain in my willingness to meet with you and brief you on matters related to the Out In Schools program and other propaganda like Gender Spectrum—another pile of propagandist nonsense put out by the BCTF.

It is obvious from the last meeting that you and a few of the other trustees appear to be ignorant of the facts relating to the Out In Schools program. This is most troubling, as you refused my request to appear before the Board at the last meeting—an appearance that would have informed you about the Out In Schools program. Are you afraid of the facts? Do you fear public condemnation when parents find out about a program that you endorse, but claim to be ignorant of? Yes, I have the video from the last meeting which confirms both these statements.

In closing, Ms. Bacchus, be advised that I will accept your invitation to meet if you have the leadership skills and courage to extend one. I will do this, I admit, not because I have any measure of respect for you—quite the contrary—but because the students involved deserve to have their best interests protected, and their parents deserve to know the truth.

Yours truly,

Kari Simpson

President, Culture Guard

Copies –

VSB Trustees

VSB Superintendent

VSB Secretary Treasurer

Media

Informed Canadians

Feb 152012
 

CultureGuard

Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Fax: 604 514-1669

News release

February 15, 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Culture Guard files formal complaint

to VSB about Out In Schools program

VANCOUVER, Feb. 15, 2012 (Culture Guard) — Kari Simpson, president of Culture Guard, filed a formal complaint this morning with the Vancouver Board of School on behalf of concerned Vancouver parents, after VSB Chair Patti Bacchus claimed at the last public Board meeting to have “no knowledge” of complaints about the Board-endorsed “Out In Schools” program.

Mrs. Simpson said she wasn’t surprised by Ms. Bacchus’s claims of ignorance: “Ms. Bacchus admitted, at that meeting, to endorsing the notorious Out In Schools program without knowing anything about it.”

Kari Simpson further states: “It appears that Ms. Bacchus is comfortable operating in a vacuum—devoid of knowing what is really transpiring in the classrooms of the Vancouver School District. Clearly, she has abdicated her duty to be the guardian of the public’s trust, and has placed the health and well-being of students in harm’s way.”

The filed complaint states: The Vancouver Board of School Trustees (VSB), by endorsing the OIS program and allowing it to be advertised, published and taught in the classrooms and/or other facilities of the Vancouver Public School District, is complicit in distributing false, dangerous and misleading information to students and parents—thus endangering the health and well-being of children, and breaching the public’s trust.

The complaint then identifies many of the more obvious failings of the program, including the goal of encouraging students to call people names by using hateful terms like “homophobe”.

Simpson goes on to say that parents will be horrified when they find out who is “sponsoring” this program in Vancouver schools. These sponsors include a “queer” sex festival and XTRA!—a division of a so-called “not-for-profit” publishing company called Pink Triangle Press, that operates (among other lucrative ventures) a casual homosexual “hook-up” site called “Squirt”.

The Out In Schools program has been able to operate under the public radar by claiming to be an “anti-bullying” program. Thus misrepresenting the goals of the program, it also made false claims that the resource had been sent to the Ministry of Education for approval, this assertion has been proved to be a lie. The VSB and the sponsoring teachers have also failed to inform parents that sex activists like Jen “Jenderf**k” Sung were “educating” their children.

The complaint sent to the Vancouver Board of School Trustees follows this release.

For more information on OIS, watch the two-part video presentations, updates, and a letter that remains unanswered by Ross Johnstone, OIS program director; all are available at www.cultureguard.com Warning: the videos contain graphic content not suitable for minors.

=30=

Contact: Kari Simpson

telephone: 604 514-1614

e-mail: cultureguard@gmail.com

CultureGuard

Tel: 604 514-1614 ~ Fax: 604 514-1669

Vancouver Board of School Trustees

C/O Vancouver School Board

1580 West Broadway

Vancouver, BC

V6J 5K8

Via Email

February 15, 2012

Re: Out In Schools

Attention: Board of School Trustees SD No. 39


Complaint to the Vancouver Board of School Trustees

I, Kari Simpson, President of Culture Guard, make this formal complaint on behalf of Vancouver parents and tax-payers who have fulsome knowledge and concerns about the Out In Schools (“OIS”) program.

Specifically that:

The Vancouver Board of School Trustees (VSB), by endorsing the OIS program and allowing it to be advertised, published and taught in the classrooms and/or other facilities of the Vancouver Public School District, is complicit in distributing false and misleading information to students and parents—thus endangering the health and well-being of children, and breaching the public’s trust.

The Preamble of the School Act states:

WHEREAS it is the goal of a democratic society to ensure that all its members receive an education that enables them to become literate, personally fulfilled and publicly useful, thereby increasing the strength and contributions to the health and stability of that society;

AND WHEREAS the purpose of the British Columbia school system is to enable all learners to become literate, to develop their individual potential and to acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to contribute to a

healthy, democratic and pluralistic society and a prosperous and sustainable economy;

But by engaging in the aforementioned conduct, the Vancouver School Board has acted contrary to the lawful mandate given to the Vancouver School District, and in violation of the spirit, purposes and goals of the BC public education system as established in law.

Further, Section 76 (2) of the School Act requires that “the highest morality” must be inculcated, but no religious dogma or creed is to be taught in a school or Provincial school. The OIS program, and its affiliated contests and goals, breaches Section 76 (2).

 

Part 1: False and misleading information to parents and students

The Vancouver Board of School Trustees has engaged, whether wittingly or not, in scamming parents and students by facilitating a program that has been falsely marketed to stakeholders.

Specifically that –

a) the OIS program has been presented as an “anti-bullying” program, which it is not;

b) the OIS goal has been alleged to be to “reduce” instances of bullying, but officers of OIS have stated other goals;

c) the OIS program was alleged to have been sent for approval, or approved by the Ministry of Education—neither of which is true;

d) the OIS program was presented as “age-appropriate”;

e) the OIS program is purportedly in compliance with the VSB policies on discrimination, but violates them;

f) the OIS program is presumed to be in compliance with the BC Human Rights Act, but it is not;

g) the OIS program and sponsoring teachers are purported to be in compliance with the BCTF code of Conduct, but they repeatedly violate it.

Part 2: Endangering the health and well-being of children

The Vancouver Board of School Trustees have recklessly breached their responsibility and duty to be guardians of the public’s trust and to protect the health and best interests of minor children, by failing to perform their due diligence in properly researching a program that actually involves the promotion and celebration of dangerous sexual practices. Further, by failing to have full knowledge about this program—a program rooted in political rhetoric, false information, and militant sex activism—the VSB has facilitated a gateway to give access to minors by sex activists, for the purpose of luring and exposing them to sexually explicit material and sexual practices known to be harmful.

Specifically that –

a) By promoting, hosting and endorsing the OIS program—a program that lures and facilitates minor students into being tricked, seduced (by “prizes”!) or scammed into attending sexualized pornographic environments under the guise of an “awards” party—the VSB is complicit in corrupting the morals of minors, and violating the trust of parents.

b) By promoting, hosting and endorsing the OIS program—a program that lures and facilitates minor students into being tricked, seduced (by “prizes”!) or scammed into attending sexualized pornographic environments under the guise of an “awards” party, the VSB has violated the public’s trust.

c) By failing to advise parents, after being informed that students were encouraged and invited to play sex games at an event publicized by OIS program via the VSB, the Board exacerbates the harm.

d) By failing to advise parents that students were possibly exposed to terms that approve of dangerous sexual practices—terms like “rimming”, “butt pirate” and other dangerous sexual acts—the VSB is failing to reduce the harm that could come to students, and is in contravention of the lawful requirements of the School Act for promoting a healthy society.

e) By promoting, hosting and endorsing the OIS program, the VSB has knowingly (or ought to have known) that minor students would be exposed to information that creates an environment of discrimination, hatred and contempt for individuals whose religious beliefs and/or cultural values and/or fact-based commonsense requires a refusal to “celebrate” sex activism or sex activist politics within the schools. These facts contravene the lawful requirement of the School Act that the VSB enable students to “…acquire the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to contribute to a healthy, democratic and pluralistic society…”

f) The OIS program cultivates hatred and contempt for students, teachers, other individuals and groups who are opposed to sex activist propaganda. These include groups and individuals whose convictions are protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as well as groups and individuals who are factually informed of the medical, psychological and societal consequences of dangerous sexual acts and other behaviours that include, but are not limited to sodomy, drug use and promiscuous sexual practices and/or other sexual practices that result in harm; e.g.: multiple partner fellatio (blow jobs) among homosexual males has led to throat cancer at levels higher than lung cancer in smokers.

g) That by engaging and indoctrinating minors in propagandist material, exemplified by the VSB’s endorsement and use of the OIS program and other similar material, the VSB is failing to educate students as to the serious implications to the health of individuals (and the obscene costs to our economy) that are a direct result of sexual promiscuity, and the VSB’s requirement of staff and students to “celebrate” these practices among identifiable groups. This violates the legislated mandate of the public schools.

h) Further, by lying to students about the proven health consequences associated with these acts, as documented by the Centres for Disease Control (and both provincial and federal budgets), the VSB is failing to achieve the established goals of fostering “socially responsible” and “informed” citizens. This failure contravenes the lawful requirement that the VSB ensure that students acquire the necessary knowledge to be a positive contributor to a healthy and sustainable economy.

i) By failing to advise parents of the true facts associated with their children’s attendance and involvement in the OIS program—and the ensuing sex party—the VSB fails to mitigate the harm. Students and parents deserve the truth.

j) Trustees approved the OIS program, relying on unidentified Pride Committee members and/or unidentified staff to determine the alleged appropriateness of a program which was in fact designed to foster values and views that conflict with and undermine the Charter-protected cultural and moral values of important stakeholders.

Part 3: Cultivating ignorance (and ignorant bullies)

The OIS program provides obvious clues that it is unsuitable for school use. The words “homophobia”, “homophobe”, “homophobic” and other similar words are used in conjunction with sex activist propaganda; this cultivates harm, hurt and contempt for individuals and/or groups who oppose the propagation of false and misleading information and/or the promotion and “celebration” of the medically harmful sexual practices and diseases typically associated with sodomy and/or other promiscuous sexual behaviours. The OIS program, as presented, violates the BC Human Rights Code by including words and actions that discriminate against identifiable groups based on their religious beliefs; and also discriminate based on age, race and ethnic background.

Specifically that:

a) The OIS program relies on the repeated use of slurs, such as “homophobia”, “homophobe”, homophobic” and “heterosexist” to demean, demoralize and to cultivate contempt and hatred for Charter-protected groups opposed to homosexual behaviours. These terms violate the spirit and letter of the law; the School Act demands the cultivation of a pluralistic society. The courts have held that the school must protect all students, including those whose religious beliefs oppose homosexuality and students whose fact-based commonsense and well-informed knowledge militate against accepting sex activist propaganda.

b) The OIS program relies on the repeated use of slurs, namely “homophobia”, “homophobe”, and “homophobic” to demean, demoralize and to cultivate contempt and hatred for individuals and/or groups who seek factual discourse on the politics of sex activism.

c) The OIS program relies on the repeated use of slurs, namely “homophobia”, “homophobe”, homophobic” to demean, demoralize and to cultivate contempt and hatred for medical and/or psychological professionals who seek to provide factual research on issues relating to homosexuality and other issues related to sexual identity.

d) The videos used in the OIS program promote hatred and contempt for those who oppose the abuse of children by indoctrinating them with false and misleading information. Further, encourage the use of slurs to demean others.

e) That one of the videos used, distributed and shown in OIS presentations, Peking Turkey, incites contempt for an identifiable group by mocking Chinese-Canadian culture.

f) That a number of the videos seemingly approve of sex activists’ bully tactics, used to make individuals accept them. In one video, a frail 91-year-old man is bullied by a relative into “accepting” her lesbian “identity”. The man dies before the film is finished; but any objective observer would be horrified at the tactics used—and seemingly approved of—by these activists.

g) The OIS’ own promotional videos, published on their website, feature young students resorting to being “bullies” against other students; this behaviour is presented as being acceptable.

Part 4: Partnering up

Unbeknown to parents, the VSB is facilitating the for-profit interests of money-making business endeavours to recruit minor children as future consumers.

Specifically that -

a) The VSB is allowing children to be used as a captive audience in a number of for-profit marketing schemes associated with the OIS program.

b) The VSB has failed to inform parents that their children are being exposed to marketing schemes that seek to recruit a new generation of sex-based consumerism. By endorsing the OIS program, the VSB is “partnering up” with other OIS-sponsoring partners, including XTRA!, a publication owned and operated by Pink Triangle Press, a so-called “non-profit” society, whose mission statement reads in part:

‘Set love free’—We honour lust and seek a world where sex is valued as a human trait, no more no less than any other, and all are free and equal, no matter whom they love.

c) The VSB has failed to inform parents that, in keeping with their mission statement of honouring “lust”, this “non-profit” organization (functioning like a for-profit corporation, except for not having to pay taxes) also operates—as one of many possible examples—a lucrative casual homosexual sex “hook-up” site called “SQUIRT”; and that students are introduced to this profitable marketing strategy through the OIS program, contests and associated parties.

d) The VSB has failed to disclose to parents that XTRA! is also a sponsor of the Queer Film Festival, and has recently ramped-up their public endorsements of OIS, thus integrating themselves deeper into the OIS program—and the influencing of students as a direct result thereof.

e) The VSB has failed to inform parents that the VSB facilitated the use of students as a test market for a new “Dirty, Silly Drinking game” called Lesbian Debauchery during a party that is hosted by OIS and in conjunction with the queer sex festival.

f) Parents have a right to know that the OIS program is a school-based marketing tool for sex consumerism; the VSB has failed to so inform them.


Part 5: Remedy –

1) That a moratorium be placed immediately on any use of the Out In Schools program in schools or on school property;

2) That parents be notified forthwith that the VSB has failed to advise them of the true nature of this program; specifically that:

a) a moratorium be placed immediately on any use of the Out In Schools) the OIS program is a political indoctrination tool;

b) their children may have been exposed to a false understanding of issues involved in homosexuality;

c) that children were exposed to hate slurs like “homophobe” and “homophobia” as being acceptable, contrary to Charter of Rights, and contrary to policies of mutual acceptance made by the VSB and the BC Human Rights Code;

d) their children may have accessed, through a VSB-approved “youth-link”, a site featuring a hard-core homosexual porn;

e) minor students may have accessed, while researching the OIS program information and the PSA contest rules, information about the Queer Film Festival and the pornographic films associated with that sex festival. These films contained promotional information and material linked to hard-core homosexual porn, violent sex, sex with dead people (necrophilia), sex with animals (bestiality) and other graphic sexual depictions that are unacceptable for minors and unlawful;

f) their children may have been taught to believe that the use of slurs promoted by this program is acceptable;

g) their children may have acquired a false understanding of the dangerous health issues related to homosexuality;

h) their children may have been given a false knowledge base relating to homosexuality, transgenderism and other issues purported to be related to sexual identity.


3) That the Board of School Trustees issues an apology to parents and students for failing to protect their interests.

4) And other provisions to be agreed upon.


Failure to place an immediate moratorium on the OIS program will result in legal action. Further, the failings of this program are not limited to the information contained herein.

Respectfully submitted on behalf of Vancouver parents, students and stakeholders,


Kari D. Simpson

President, Culture Guard