Beyond the Talk: Josh del Sol – Smart Meter Conspiracy No Longer a Theory

 1 Response »
Jan 312014
 

This week on Beyond the Talk, Josh del Sol – Producer and Director of the eye-opening film “Take Back Your Power” – joins Kari Simpson for a fast-paced look at how our freedoms and liberties are being diminished as big government continues to grow, and through technology spies on private citizens and tramples on your right to privacy.

Please go to TakeBackYourPower.net and watch the film. Then follow the instructions on the website and VOTE! Let’s make this film an award-winning message to the masses. With your help, we can do it!

Galganov: More About The Dumbest People EVER

 Comments Off on Galganov: More About The Dumbest People EVER
Apr 172013
 

In 1996, Hillary Clinton wrote a book titled: “It Takes a Village: And Other Lessons Children Teach Us.”

Just this past week, MSNBC Host Melissa Harris-Perry repeated Clinton’s notion that IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO RAISE A CHILD. And she meant it.

She actually went even further than Clinton, by explaining that children “DO NOT BELONG TO THEIR PARENTS OR FAMILIES” . . . and that we should “RECOGNIZE THAT KIDS BELONG TO WHOLE COMMUNITIES”.

WHERE’S THE TAR AND FEATHERS FOR HER?

What makes this ridiculous notion beyond belief and DANGEROUS . . . is that amongst the LEFT . . . this kind of thinking makes sense.

IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO RAISE AN IDIOT:

Not only is the LEFT a disgrace to the eminence of what the United States USED TO BE, it is indeed the ENEMY FROM WITHIN.

It didn’t take a village to raise the exceptional men and women who made America the ONCE-UPON-A-TIME greatest country that has ever been. It took strong, honest, dedicated, demanding and LOVING parents to raise INDEPENDENT minded children to lead the world.

We see just how good a job the VILLAGE has done in raising children from fatherless homes, where mothers are more or less children themselves, ESPECIALLY in the Black communities.

You can look in the prisons, on the welfare lines, the unemployment lines, at places where junkies go to get their fixes, and in the grocery checkouts where food is paid for with PLASTIC FOOD-STAMP CARDS – Almost FIFTY MILLION of them.

The fact that this MSNBC television personality (Melissa Harris-Perry) is a Black Woman, who said such an appalling thing, SHOUTS volumes about a mindset that is LITERALLY destroying Black America – is simply OUTRAGEOUS.

AS UN-AMERICAN AS IT GETS:

The very notion that anyone but loving parents should raise America’s children, is so OBSCENE, that it harkens back to the mindsets of the likes Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot and others of that despicable ilk . . . is as UN-AMERICAN as it gets.

If America’s LEFT, especially those within government, the social services, and education have even the slightest amount of support for this contemptible concept, which they do . . . all that can be said is America has come to its end. And the job now is to save only what can be saved.

THE END MIGHT BE NEARER THAN PEOPLE THINK:

America . . . like much of the rest of the world is printing money as fast as the presses can turn, putting the country and the rest of the world at extreme risk once the FED’S Ponzi Scheme runs its course, and people finally figure out that the American dollar will be worthless.

The Stock Market is booming . . . ONLY because the FED is flooding the Big Banks with useless money. And only because there is nowhere else for investors – large or small to grow their savings.

So, when the truth hits the fan, and the REALITY of American investment is laid bare for all to see, there will be a HUGE collapse. And in spite of all that the government is doing to hide the truth from the people, the very near future is now evident for all to see.

1 – Unemployment and underemployment is at best hovering just above 20%, and probably closer to 25% when everything is taken into account. And there’s nothing in the winds that suggest that it’s going to be getting any better any time soon.

To the contrary . . . EVERYTHING indicates that it’s only going to be getting worse.

2 – Almost FIFTY MILLION Americans are on Food-Stamps AND GROWING.

3 – Just about HALF of all Americans are on some type of Government Social Assistance.

4 – Less than 20% of the entire American population is carrying the entire weight of the country upon their shoulders.

5 – The American Government has DECLARED WAR upon the American Working Middle Class, including Small to Medium Size Businesses.

6 – Hollywood Elitists, Big Bankers, Giant Corporations, Unions, Civil Servants, Intellectuals, and all manner of Limousine Liberals have a FREE RIDE in America at the expense of America and the America people.

7 – America is no longer a Deterrent to Global threats, as can be witnessed as a pissant country like North Korea brings American Foreign Policy to its knees.

8 – The Arabs and Persians (Iran) couldn’t give a Rat’s Ass to what America thinks. Yet, the ONLY country America is prepared to BULLY is Israel, the ONLY true Democracy and FRIEND to America anywhere in that part of the world (Middle East), including most of Asia and Africa.

9 – With every passing day, the government is stripping more and more FREEDOMS from the American people with a plethora of ridiculous anti-choice regulations. How long do you think FREE people are going to continue to take this?

THE PEOPLE ARE ARMING THEMSELVES:

What does it say about Americans’ trust in their own government, when MILLIONS of Americans, including those who never held a gun in their hands, are all of a sudden buying all manner of guns and ammunition, as if it was their last chance to do so?

What does it say about wealthy and even not so wealthy Americans who are selling off dollars for Gold and Silver? Or are keeping their money under their mattresses?

WHAT IT SAYS ABOUT AMERICA . . . is that America is about to come apart at the seams as Conservative RIGHT TO WORK States put daylight and distance between themselves and the LEFTIST States that can’t survive without the money from the Conservatives.

I have held this opinion for quite a while. And whenever I’ve tried to find even a SLIVER of a silver lining in this dreadful cloud, all I found was more cloud.

THIS MIGHT BE THE FINAL STRAW:

With this new uncontested revelation by the LEFT . . . that children DO NOT BELONG TO THEIR PARENTS . . . but in fact BELONG TO THE COMMUNITIES, I truly believe that the RUBICON has been crossed.

I know animals . . . especially dogs. And I can tell you with 100% confidence, that barking dogs very rarely bite. Even growing dogs usually just posture. But dogs that are silent, yet stare with true malice, are the ones to be very much afraid of.

I’m not hearing much barking coming from a very angry Conservative populace. Are you?

I don’t want to be seen as a Conspiracy Theorist, but, one really has to wonder if the American government isn’t seeing the same thing that I am, since Homeland Security is purchasing as much military grade bullets (1.6 BILLION Rounds) as fast the manufacturers can produce them.

And could someone please explain to me why the Department of Social Services purchased 174,000 Hollow-Point bullets?

ONLY A NATION OF FOOLS WOULD DESTROY THEIR OWN DREAM.

Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov

Galganov: The Courts Are ANTI-FREEDOM

 1 Response »
Mar 202013
 

UNAFFORDABLE JUSTICE IS NO JUSTICE AT ALL:

When there’s no real justice for people in the courts or government . . . where do people who have been done-in by the system turn to next?

The terrible answer to this question is NOWHERE . . . where we really want to be, and that’s the rudiment of revolutions.

I have spent much of my life around animals, big and small. And amongst the many things I discovered in the animal world, is that we humans are not all that much different from them.

We have our joys and fears. We “scrounge” for food. And we seek shelter when and where we can, just like animals do. AND WE DEFEND OUR LIBERTY where and when we can.

The intelligence factor between the animal world and our world is secondary to our naturally born instincts. And here is where we share more in common with the animal world – than not.

Just like humans, most animals are satisfied to live their lives amongst their own kind in peace. But, also just like humans, there are animals within their own kind who fight to dominate.

And then there are the hunters who feed off the gatherers.

Are You a Cowering Animal?

Are You a Cowering Animal?

The gatherers tend to flee and/or hide when chased by the hunters in both worlds, as we can see when the Lion chases down the Gazelle amongst a fleeing herd, whose only objective amongst the individual members of the herd is not to be the one to be caught and killed by the Lion.

THE BEST HUMAN EXAMPLE EVER:

When the Nazis and their European Allies hunted down the Jews, they too (the Jewish herd) ran and hid like gatherers in the animal world . . . rather than fight.

And even when their backs were up against the wall, and their loved-ones threatened, instead of fighting, they prayed, they begged, and they hoped for the best.

DO ALL ANIMALS COWER, RUN, AND HIDE?

Anne and I have a pony who’s about 600 pounds. But . . . pound for pound, he’s tougher than either of our two twelve hundred pound horses. And when challenged, not only will this pony stand his ground, it’s just as likely that he’ll go at his challenger.

I’ve seen videos of Wildebeest circling the proverbial wagons when confronted by Lions. So, not all gatherers will succumb quietly to the threats of the hunters.

THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL . . . is the animal that is cornered, which sees no chance for flight, which by nature would never fight, but very well might when there is no other choice.

I’ve even seen mice bare their teeth to cats when their hope is zero.

AND THAT’S WHO MANY OF US ARE TOO.

Not every European Jew willingly stepped into the Cattle Car, or stood over the grave that he or she had dug for himself or herself. Not every European Jew listened with obedience to the commands of his or her tormentors, or his or her co-religionist Quislings.

When people are pushed into a corner, it is indeed a reality that some, just like otherwise gentle animals will fight back, and MORE likely than not, perhaps not a majority, but some nonetheless, will fight long before they are forced into that position.

Think about how few Patriots there were in the 1770’s who really took on the British, driving-out the greatest empire at that time.

OUR COURTS ARE DEFILING OUR FREEDOMS . . . YET – WE’RE NOT FIGHTING BACK:

NOT YET ANYWAYS . . .

In Canada . . . Racist French TRIBALISTS in four small Ontario (Canada) Townships passed a bylaw FORBIDDING the stand-alone use of the English language on private commercial signs, making the unrestricted use of the English language against the law in a province that is NINETY-SIX PERCENT NOT French.

Even the Courts agreed that this FORCED bilingual sign bylaw violated Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But – said in their judgments; that under the circumstance to help promote the French language, that negating Freedom of Expression for English speakers was the right thing to do.

My case was simple . . .

Do these FORCED bilingual laws violate my FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION? – YES OR NO?

ALMOST THREE QUARTERS OF A MILLION DOLLARS over a period of some 4 years, and losses at the Ontario Superior Court and the Ontario Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada decided without explanation NOT TO HEAR OUR APPEAL, rendering the FORCED bilingual sign law the law of Canada.

All of the judicial decisions from court to court were in themselves reprehensible. But, what was as much a TRAVESTY of Justice and FREEDOM, and perhaps even more so to the actual decisions, were the costs PILED-UP by the lawyers and the Courts over a ridiculous period of time to decide upon a simple question.

CAN YOU AFFORD TO PAY OVER $350,000 TO DEFEND YOUR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION?

Was my RIGHT to FREEDOM of EXPRESSION Violated as is clearly SPELLED-OUT in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms under Section 2b?

THE ANSWER IS YES . . . So – what do I do when the judicial system is ESTABLISHED to make lawyers rich, while at the same time, gives judges the undisputed RIGHT to add or remove CONSTITUTIONAL guarantees as they so desire?

And if the courts can take away my FREEDOM of expression with impunity, what else can they take away from me AND YOU?

DIDN’T THE AMERICAN SUPREME COURT RULE AGAINST FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE?

There is no question or argument . . . none whatsoever, that the government, according to the US Constitution cannot ORDER a person to purchase a product or a service.

Yet, that is exactly what the US Supreme Court did in deciding upon the legitimacy of Obamacare, simply by defining the forced participation of the people as a tax, opposed to being a FORCED purchase.

So . . . What does an American, or an American company do when he or she does not want to purchase Obamacare for whatever reason?

I WANT TO GO BACK TO THE LOSS OF MY FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN CANADA.

For me to go to court to MAINTAIN . . . not to win anything, but just to MAINTAIN my Freedom of Expression, my personal cost was MORE than $350,000.

I had to pay my lawyers more than $100,000, and a portion of the other side’s lawyers to the tune of $250,000 of their costs.

I AM ASKING THESE QUESTIONS IN FULL KNOWLEDGE OF YOUR ANSWER:

Would you personally be prepared or capable of paying $350,000 or more to defend your RIGHT to Freedom of Expression?

Would you be willing to risk as much as, and more than $350,000 of your own money and future to fight for the FREEDOMS of others?

If you are not capable of paying for what should be your day in court . . . WHERE IS YOUR RIGHT TO JUSTICE?

REMEMBER WHAT I WROTE ABOUT PASSIVE ANIMALS:

As more people in the USA and Canada are denied their very basic RIGHTS and FREEDOMS through political and judicial intimidation, coupled to CRIPPLING costs, people will find another way to seek redress and justice.

When cornered with nowhere to go, even some of the most passive animals will bare their teeth, knowing full well that there is no way they can survive, but they will fight nonetheless.

The governments that should be of the people, by the people and for the people as Abraham Lincoln stated in his Gettysburg Address should think long and hard about the potential of people who are fed-up, and have their backs up against the wall.

In my next editorial . . . I will explain how we are sticking it to the lawyers, the courts and the politicians.

Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov

Freedom of Speech Diminished by Supreme Court of Canada

 Comments Off on Freedom of Speech Diminished by Supreme Court of Canada
Mar 092013
 

TO:  Each judge of the Supreme Court of Canada
March 4, 2013

Your recent decision regarding the Whatcott case is EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTING in that it further restricts freedom of speech in Canada.

Your decision indicates that a claimant is allowed to make a complaint to the Human Rights Commission or the courts if that person is “offended” by something I may have said to him/her.  That is so broad it is Gestapo-like fearful to us.

On the Supreme Court website, beside a photo of Justice McLachlin, she makes a statement about Canada’s Supreme Court philosophy: “accommodation of differences”.  These three words clash with what your decision amounts to.  You make no “accommodation” for people of faith to freely express their beliefs with full religious conviction.

i.e. I talk to my neighbor and tell him about God’s Word as recorded in the Bible and he gets offended.  I cannot and will not apologize for having quoted a direct quote from the Bible.  He then can, with the endorsement of the recent decision, lodge a complaint about me having offended him.

Does this not justify the common perception that comes from the public that you judges are really “activists judges”?

All evangelical churches exist to proselytize, and due to the diminished interest in religion, many people who don’t want to hear what the Bible has to say are offended.  And that will enable them to have the opportunity to lodge a complaint.  Then the complainant has no legal expenses, but the defendant might have some hefty legal bills.

You have set Canada on a path that is vastly different from what freedoms we have had in the past.  This is not merely disappointing, it is highly offensive to us.  Would this now be grounds for us lodging a complaint against the judges of the Supreme Court because we are deeply offended?

You are playing alarmingly loose with our freedoms.

~ Leonard Remple

RKR News: Sex and Government

 Comments Off on RKR News: Sex and Government
Feb 272013
 

Three stories popped up in this week’s headlines that all have to do with governments trying to legislate sex, more or less. Whether it’s forcing gay-straight alliances into religious schools, deciding if Canadians can express their religious beliefs about sodomy, or taking measures to keep so-called gay propaganda out of the reach of children, governments are certainly not shying away from imposing their opinions about sex on the public. Read on…

Manitoba’s anti-bullying law opposed by religious schools

Some Manitoba religious schools say the government is infringing on their religious freedoms with its new anti-bullying law.

About 1,000 staff, students and parents met Sunday night in the gymnasium at Steinbach Christian High School for an information and prayer event regarding Bill 18.

A clause in the bill concerns some religious educators and school communities because it would force schools to accommodate students who want to start specific anti-bullying clubs, including gay-straight alliances. Read more here.

Supreme Court set to update legal definition of hate-speech in first ruling of Internet age

Canada’s controversial 20-year-old legal definition of hatred is set to be updated or even overturned on Wednesday, as the Supreme Court of Canada rules in the case of William Whatcott, a born-again anti-gay pamphleteer who ran afoul of Saskatchewan’s Human Rights Code.

Pitting freedom of religion and speech against a legal regime that bans the repeated public expression of hate, the Whatcott case could see the legal foundation of several anti-hate laws crumble, including Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Read more here.

Russia’s Foreign Minister Defends Anti-Gay Bill

Russia’s foreign minister on Tuesday rejected criticism from the Dutch government and the European Union about proposed legislation that would outlaw “homosexual propaganda.”

Responding to Dutch assertions that the legislation may be contrary to Russia’s international obligations, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said there were no such obligations.

“We don’t have a single international or common European commitment to allow propaganda of homosexuality,” he said. Read more here.

Galganov: 250,000 Reasons NOT to Fight for Freedom… One Reason FOR

 Comments Off on Galganov: 250,000 Reasons NOT to Fight for Freedom… One Reason FOR
Feb 132013
 

If you’re an American reading this . . . try to imagine being punished to the tune of A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS – ONLY for refusing to use a language other than English on your own PRIVATE commercial sign . . . by standing up to say NO.

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION . . . WITH THE COURT’S PERMISSION THAT IS:

Over the past few years, with some financial help from a number of people who visit Galganov.com, with just a very few individuals with somewhat deeper pockets, and about fifty or so working-class and retired grass-roots folk who are part of a RIGHTS organization, we did our best to cover the cost of a very basic fight to preserve our MOST fundamental Freedom, which is FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.

When I say that we did our best . . . I really mean that we did our best.

By the time the dust settled, between how much money I put-in, and what others contributed, we spent well MORE than $100,000 in a case against an insignificant Township to preserve our FREEDOM of EXPRESSION.

IN A NUTSHELL . . . a miniscule number of French Language Activists located just East of the City of Ottawa (Canada), in a Township called Russell, in collusion with an English speaking politically motivated LEFTIST Mayor, and two French speakers on his Council, passed a bylaw FORCING merchants to use FRENCH on their signs alongside English, whether the Merchants wanted to or not.

NO GUARANTEE TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN CANADA:

Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, according to Section 2b, which GUARANTEES Freedom of Expression . . . DOESN’T REALLY GUARANTEE ANYTHING. It’s a sham.

What happened in the Russell FORCED Bilingual Sign Law Case is equivalent to saying that the FIRST AMENDMENT in the American Constitution is open to Judicial interpretation on when and where the English language can be used.

THINK SPANISH AND WHAT YOUR POLITICIANS WILL BE WILLING TO SELL FOR VOTES:

I’m not writing about screaming fire in a crowded movie theater. Nor am I writing about using words to defame someone.

What I’m writing about . . . is being FORCED by the government, in this case a lowly Township, to use a language not of your own choosing, in spite of your own objections, on your own PRIVATE commercial sign (property).

There’s no debate or argument over the message of the sign . . . IT’S ONLY ABOUT THE LANGUAGE.

THIS IS NOTHING LESS THAN LINGUISTIC AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ON STEROIDS:

According to this sign-law, I am breaking the law in this community (as well as three others with similar laws) if I put up a sign that does not carry the English message in French . . . same size same message.

Therefore . . . the government is ORDERING private citizens to express themselves in ways that are AGAINST THEIR OWN FREE WILL.

BUT THERE’S MORE TO IT THAN THAT . . .

Because of French Language Activism in Canada, there is a loophole in our Constitution that allows special accommodation to the French language . . . that includes ABROGATING the Constitutional RIGHTS of English speakers.

YOU READ THAT RIGHT . . . If it favors French Speakers, English Speaker’s RIGHTS do not count; meaning that for Anglos, there is no Constitutional Guarantee to Freedom of Expression when French becomes a factor.

THE DEMOGRAPHICS ILLUSTRATE TYRANNY OF THE MINORITY:

In all of Canada, excluding the French Separatist and linguistic racist ethnocentric Province of Quebec, there are ONLY 3% of the population who consider themselves to be French Speakers.

But, unless you can pass a French proficiency exam, which just about all Anglos CANNOT, it is nearly impossible to get a job working anywhere in the country for the federal government.

How’s that for linguistic discrimination at the hands of a 3% minority?

Ontario is about 4% French. And of those 4%, most of them live in small French communities scattered throughout the province, with a preponderance living within an hour of the National Capital (Ottawa), and the border to the Ethnocentric English-Hating French Province of Quebec, where the unrestricted use of the English language is AGAINST the law.

And of that 4% – just about 100% speak English . . . so why the problem?

Because a small town Mayor (Ken Hill) with political dreams of grandeur decided to pass a bylaw usurping the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, for no purpose other than to make a few French TRIBALISTS feel good about themselves, and possibly give himself the French vote in a larger political context, the Court Costs awarded AGAINST me are $250,000 because we lost.

BUT HOW CAN ANYONE LOSE FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION?

These costs include our first loss at Superior Court, where the self-declared French Activist Judge Monique Metivier said in Court; that even though the Russell Bylaw violated Freedom of Expression, it was the RIGHT THING TO DO.

The cost also included the THREE Judges of the Ontario Court of Appeal who said the same thing. IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

And then there’s the cost for the Activist Supreme Court of Canada, which refused to hear our APPEAL, even though this bylaw and various other challenges we made to the Supreme Court in our request for LEAVE, actually violated their own jurisprudence.

Even though all the Judges agreed that it was the RIGHT THING TO DO, not one of them said why and how it’s supported by the Constitution . . . And here is where it gets really serious:

CANADA HAS A NEW LANGUAGE LAW . . . AND NO ONE KNOWS IT:

Because the Supreme Court refused to hear our appeal . . . this linguistically racist bylaw against the English majority in just one community, introduced by a pissant mayor and council, all of whom were defeated in the follow-up election . . . IS NOW THE LAW OF CANADA.

WHERE WAS THE MEDIA?

Canada’s media can teach LEFTIST journalism to most American News Providers. How scary is that?

If any issue casts a shadow of doubt on the BIG CANADIAN LIE, that Canada is a bilingual country, which is as far removed from the truth as you can possibly get, the Canadian media stays as far away from it as they can . . . as if it was the plague.

I used the headline – 250,000 REASONS NOT TO FIGHT FOR FREEDOM, because it’s true.

Ask yourself this . . . Why would anyone want to fight a battle for the FREEDOM of some thirty-three million people who are lost in a fog, and wouldn’t so much as lift a finger to defend themselves or contribute to their own defense?

FOR ME – THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE . . . Even though there were 250,000 reasons for me NOT to have done this, there is only one reason that I did.

IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR FREEDOM.

Young men and women . . . and not so young men and women have fought, and are still fighting all over this planet for the FREEDOMS of others, while in our own countries (the USA and Canada), people take our FREEDOMS for granted.

We allow our politicians, nameless and faceless bureaucrats, and ACTIVIST JUDGES to nibble away at our FREEDOMS everyday, as if our FREEDOMS are mere suggestions opposed to ironclad guarantees.

I TOOK A $250,000 BEATING – BUT I DIDN’T DIE. AND I WASN’T WOUNDED.

My father, as a young Canadian landed on the shores of Sicily, before the D-DAY Invasion. He was wounded at the Battle of Casino, but fought-on nonetheless. He was decorated and mentioned in dispatches many times. And was awarded the Bronze Lion by her Majesty Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands FOR BRAVERY ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY.

My dad fought in Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Germany. And like MILLIONS of brave soldiers who fought all over the world so the world could be FREE, he did it not because he was forced to, and not because there was some kind of reward at the end of the war . . . BUT BECAUSE IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

How do you compare living under the daily threat of mutilation or death in war, to being whacked for a Quarter of Million Dollars by lawyers who profit in the DEATH of Constitutional FREEDOMS?

THERE IS NO COMPARISON . . . And like my dad who fought-on with a bandaged shrapnel wound to his head at Monte Casino . . . I DON’T QUIT EITHER.

It is obvious that we cannot win in the Courts, where Freedom is what the Judges have decided Freedom should be. But, WE CAN WIN IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION, where Freedom MUST be more than just a suggestion.

Whether you’re a Canadian or an American . . . you have a duty to yourself and to your country to get into the fight. Because, if you accept that your Freedoms should be open to the interpretation of the government and Courts, then you don’t deserve to enjoy the FREEDOMS other people bled and died for you to have.

I DON’T HAVE $250,000 . . . And this loss is not without real personal consequences for me. But I would do it all over again. ACTUALLY, I have no intention whatsoever of slowing down, let alone stopping, and not just about language.

If ONE FREEDOM is under attack . . . all of our FREEDOMS are under attack, and I will not stand silent or passive. To the LEFT, the RIGHTS of Government over the RIGHTS of the INDIVIDUAL have long been an International Conspiracy.

OUR GLOBAL DEFENSE FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AND LIBERTIES MUST BE NO LESS.

So, when I ask visitors to Galganov.com from time to time to help out financially, you can now see why.

And if I care enough about all of our FREEDOMS to have laid my fiscal life on the line, the least people can do who enjoy reading my editorials is care a bit too.

The mark of success is not in winning, since winning can be defined in a million ways.

REAL SUCCESS . . . is fighting against a much greater foe knowing that you probably won’t win, but getting into the fight nonetheless, because it is the right thing to do. And no matter how much of a pounding you take . . .

YOU NEVER GIVE UP – AND YOU NEVER STOP . . . NO MATTER HOW TOUGH IT GETS.

Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov

A Free Society Should Tolerate a Christian-Based Law School

 Comments Off on A Free Society Should Tolerate a Christian-Based Law School
Jan 232013
 

John Carpay, Vancouver Sun, January 21, 2013

William Flanagan argues that Trinity Western University (TWU) should not be allowed to set up its own law school because this Christian university is guilty of “discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.”

As the dean of the faculty of law at Queen’s University, Flanagan should know that a free society tolerates a wide range of opinion on all topics, including sexual morality. No law compels anyone to agree with Flanagan’s opinions about sex and sexuality, nor is he compelled to agree with Christian teaching about sex and sexuality.

A free society allows adherents of all religious and non-religious faiths (including agnostics, atheists, and people who believe in God without adhering to any particular religion) to proclaim what they believe to be the truth. A free society also allows people of like mind to associate together and establish their own institutions, including charities, schools, hospitals, churches, universities, and even law schools. For Flanagan to suggest that all Canadian law schools must comply with one, single government-enforced ideology about sexual behaviour is the opposite of a free society. The imposition of one world view on all institutions is the hallmark of totalitarianism.

Further, Flanagan is wrong in accusing TWU of “discriminating” against gays. Consistent with over 2,000 years of Christian teaching, TWU’s “community covenant” imposes a range of penalties (including expulsion) on heterosexual students who engage in sex outside of marriage. This community covenant applies to all staff and all students, regardless of sexual orientation, prohibiting adultery, pornography, promiscuity, etc. Any student, whether gay or straight, who does not wish to abide by TWU’s code of conduct is free to attend another university. Nobody is required to abide by these rules, unless a person voluntarily submits to them. For Flanagan to characterize these rules as “anti-gay” is misleading.

In TWU v. College of Teachers, the Supreme Court of Canada addressed Flanagan’s concerns by ruling that “there is nothing in the TWU Community Standards, which are limited to prescribing conduct of members while at TWU, that indicates that graduates of TWU will not treat homosexuals fairly and respectfully.” The court also noted that religious public education rights are enshrined in Section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867.

Canada has indisputably the most monolithic body of law schools in the western world. They are all of the same model, promoting a politically correct world view which rarely if ever questions the progressive orthodoxies of radical feminism, socialist economics, aboriginal entitlements, and libertine sexual politics. Those who shout the loudest for “tolerance” and “diversity” are in fact the most intolerant of any real diversity in opinion, as can be seen by the Canadian Council of Law Deans opposing the creation of a law school which might be different from all the others.

Whatever Flanagan’s views about sex may be, he is free to persuade other people of their correctness. Apparently not content with this freedom, Flanagan seems to believe that every law school in Canada must comply with and teach his ideology. This hostility to authentic diversity runs counter to the fundamental freedoms of expression and association, both protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Canada’s fundamental freedom of religion and conscience is not limited to people who are religious as such. Every person holds metaphysical beliefs in respect of questions like: Why do we exist? What is right and wrong? How should we behave? Science can tell you how to end the life of a convicted murderer, but not whether it is right or wrong to do so, or why, or under what circumstances, if any. The Charter protects the rights of atheists, agnostics and theists alike to ponder these questions, arrive at their own conclusions, share those conclusions with their fellow citizens, and act upon their convictions.

A free society protects atheists and agnostics from government coercion as much as it protects theists. To insist that all law schools (or other institutions) must subscribe to a particular set of beliefs about sexual behaviour threatens the freedom of everyone — including Flanagan’s freedom.

Calgary lawyer John Carpay is President of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (www.jccf.ca).

John Carpay, B.A., LL.B.
President
Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
#253, 7620 Elbow Drive SW
Calgary, Alberta, T2V 1K2
Phone: (403) 619-8014

www.jccf.ca

“Defending the constitutional freedoms of Canadians”

Road Warrior of the Week: Bill Whatcott

 Comments Off on Road Warrior of the Week: Bill Whatcott
Dec 242012
 

Bill Whatcott is a Canadian rarity: a fearless and relentless fighter for his personal beliefs and for the rights of ALL Canadians to exercise their free speech. Facing vilification and persecution by close-minded opponents who clearly fear an open and honest debate on issues like abortion, homosexuality, gun control, and religious expression, Whatcott has endured trumped-up legal charges, financial penalties, kangaroo court sanctions, and years of imprisonment. Still, he persists, successfully overturning one wrong decision after another and marching on with your freedoms and safety in mind.

RoadKill Radio Triumphs over Bullies: Our Videos Are Back!

 4 Responses »
Aug 212012
 

ROADKILL RADIO NEWS RELEASE
August 21, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

RoadKill Radio triumphs over bullies:

All RKR videos restored by Vimeo

August 21, 2012 (RKR News)—RoadKill Radio, a feisty free-speech, pro-life and pro-family North American news and public affairs Internet site that has now posted more than three million on-line hits, announced today that they have successfully quashed attempts by a convicted sex offender to silence them.

Earlier this month, a registered sex offender convicted for sexually abusing a minor male persuaded Vimeo, the on-line hosting service used by RoadKillRadio.com, to take down more than 200 videos produced by RKR; he alleged that one video, a news report about his million-dollar lawsuit against Brian Camenkar of MassResistance—a pro-truth organization in Massachusetts—was “discriminatory” and violated a fraudulently obtained restraining order he possessed.

When Vimeo received the sex offender’s complaint, they quickly took down that RKR interview—only informing RoadKill Radio after the fact.

RKR General Manger, Jim Lawter appealed to Vimeo, asking them to clarify their position; but there was initially no response from Vimeo. Then, when RKR uploaded a new, updated interview with Camenkar, Vimeo accused RKR of “re-posting” a deleted video (which was untrue) and further notified RKR that they had reviewed other videos and found them to be in “violation of section 7 of the terms and conditions of their contract.” Vimeo went on to advise RKR that all of their videos had been removed, and RoadKill Radio would be prohibited from renewing their contract with them.

RKR News host and free speech warrior Kari Simpson is no stranger to the tactics of lies and misinformation used by sex activists to manipulate the gay-dumb media to pander to the sex activists’ agenda. Unlike most civil-minded Canadians, who typically wither and retreat, Simpson fired off a letter to the American run corporation Vimeo demanding that they honour their contract; RKR then retained Charles LiMandri, a respected American lawyer who is a noted defender of the law and the Constitution’s protection of free speech. Mr. LiMandri sent a follow-up demand to Vimeo.

RoadKill Radio General Manager Jim Lawter said the news site’s efforts to reverse the deletion were materially helped by two important news services: LifeSite News and Sun News Network ; and by RoadKill Radio’s global network of fans and supporters. Further, by Brian Camenkar of Mass Resistance who courageously posted the video interview on his website after Vimeo removed it. Lawter states: “We have been overwhelmed by the response and support generated by this important free speech battle. Clearly, Sun News Network and LifeSite News are crucial news agencies that have filled the information gap created by a lazy conventional media that is either clueless or too cowardly to report about important matters affecting our freedoms and liberties.”

Lawter added, “As far as we can determine, those were the only news outlets in all of Canada that had the journalistic integrity and courage to stand up to the bullies and report the truth.”

Early this morning Charles S. LiMandri advised RoadKill Radio that Vimeo had reversed their decision and restored all of RoadKill Radio’s videos, which can again be viewed at RoadKillRadio.com; and further, that they will honour the renewed contract they have with RKR.

It is a good day for truth.

=30=

For more information please contact:

Kari Simpson

Tel: 604 514-1614

Email: RKRadio@telus.net

updated 23 August 2012

RoadKill Radio News, Activists Special!

 Comments Off on RoadKill Radio News, Activists Special!
Feb 142012
 

Join Kari Simpson & Ron Gray

Starting at 4:30 pm Eastern, February 14, 2012

On

RoadKill Radio.com

Smart Canadians are CHEERING!

Maverick Member of Parliament BRIAN STORSETH joins Kari Simpson and Ron Gray and talks about his Private Member’s Bill C-304, a Bill which seeks to restore the fundamental freedoms of speech back to Canadians!  YAY!! If passed, this would curtail the severe abuses of the Human Rights Commissions and Tribunals throughout the country, entities which currently deny basic rights of freedom, legal representation, and prohibits “truth” as a defence to some Canadians.

Bill C-304 will have second reading today and be voted on February 15, 2012, call your MP and demand they vote in favour of Bill C-304!! Log on, listen and act!

Visit MP Brian Storseth’s website today and support Bill C-304!!  Click here

Important Show

WHERE: Listen/watch – http://www.roadkillradio.com

EMAIL THE SHOW: Roadkillradio@live.ca

Your Calls, Your Thoughts, Your Opinions, Your Outrage is welcome!

ALL SHOWS ARE ARCHIVED, LISTEN FOR FREE!!!