Apr 262011

Show #98 Part 1

Download Show #98 Part 1

7:30 – 8:15 pm: ALEX SCHADENBERG, Executive Director for the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, discusses a number of new legal challenges – including one launched today by the BC Civil Liberties Association – to strike down Canada’s assisted suicide law. IMPORTANT!!

  2 Responses to “Life or Death? Canada’s Assisted Suicide law is challenged”

  1. There are striking parallels between what happened to the unwanted in the Third Reich and what’s happening to the unwanted today in Canada.

    It is the same kind of Socially Engineered mentality. We don’t respect human life and we dehumanize it and then get rid of it ! Even though our ill, weak and helpless deserve our protection Canada, not Capital Punishment.

    The Nazis dehumanized their victims by calling them subhuman, non-human, parasites, animals, objects, and non-persons. The same terminology dominates today’s pro-abortion semanticists.

    Do you realize that the Nazis “technically” did not break the “LAW” in the Holocaust ? They passed over 400 “LAWS “ leading up to the final solution ! Each defendant at Nuremberg invoked the ”LAW” to justify their involvement in the Holocaust. They said we are not responsible.

    “WHAT IS LEGAL IS MORAL,” is a frightening slogan used to justify all kinds of atrocities today in Canada and through history. This is done today through our Education Establishments who condition students, and thus this mindset permeates the professionals of our society.

    Legality was used to exterminate natives in Australia, Africa, North and South America, India, the killing of Jews and the murder of the unwanted today. Legality was also used to justify slavery or human-trafficking, the slave trade, and do you remember that the so-called Darwin’s lower races only got the vote here in Canada in 1947, Native Canadians in 1960.

    The main term used by the pro-abortion propagandist in our Education Establishments is the term “CHOICE”. The right to choose.
    The main term used by the Nazis propagandist to cover up their killing was “SELECTION”. The right to select.
    It was the doctors who were conditioned into making selections in the Nazis death camps.
    It is the doctors today, in conjunction with pregnant women, who are conditioned in making “choices” in the abortion chambers.
    The right to select in the past and the right to choose today represents the “evil” power to destroy those who cannot defend themselves.

    After The Second World War, the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal indicted ten Nazi Leaders for encouraging and compelling abortions, which the West then considered a crime against humanity.
    ” Trials Of War Criminals”,Nuremberg Military Tribunal,Washington,DC: USGPO, VOL.IV,page610.

    In a democracy the citizens are accountable and responsible for electing politicians who pass or reject Bills into Canadian Law in our Legislatures and Parliament. Citizens what have many of you become?

  2. Doctors ought to be healers not killers.Why are our Education Establishments now conditioning them to be killers?

    The Dutch experience should be enough to demonstrate the danger of granting physicians the right to kill their patients, because Euthanasia would change the nature of the medical profession itself. Physicians would be cast in the role of killers rather than healers.The Hippocratic Oath was written to place the medical profession on the foundation of healing not killing. For over 2,400 years patients have had the assurance that doctors would follow an oath to heal them, not kill them. The doctor-patient relationship would change with Legalized Euthanasia.

    Medical care would be affected. Physicians would begin to ration health care so that the elderly and disabled patients would not be receiving the same quality of care as everyone else. Legalizing Euthanasia would result in less care for the dying rather than better care. Legalizing euthanasia would open the door to anyone wanting the right to kill themselves. Soon as various Court Precedents begin to broaden the application of the right to die to other groups in society like the disabled or the clinically depressed.

    My Dad visited The Netherlands and told me the horrors of his friends, and the “Dutch experience” .But our Politicians and Supreme Court Justices can be trusted not to have us killed,or can they ? What kind of democratic society would allow this to happen? In a democracy the citizens are responsible for the Laws of the land.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.